Debate stations

Generally there are two candidates at this station and two observers. Each candidate is presented with a side to argue. Typically, after three to five minutes of discussion, you will need to verbally evaluate yourself and the other candidate.

For example, “Candidate 1 believes that the Olympics are a waste of money; candidate 2 disagrees. Defend your position to the other candidate.”

• This station assesses how you interact with others (especially someone who does not share your opinion); although structured and logical arguments are good, the purpose is less about “winning” the debate and more about showing that you can think critically about what is being presented, and respectfully interact well with the other candidate
• A stronger argument will be based on evidence instead of opinion only; try to refer to sources where relevant (such as a book, class, article, news item)
• The PESTLE model could be used to explore the pros and/or cons from a political, economic, social, technological, legal, and ethical perspective, if relevant
• If you would have preferred to argue the other side, use this to your advantage; prepare counterarguments based on what you would have stated for the other side
• Avoid attacking the other candidate; focus on the issue
• When evaluating the debate, you can be more critical of yourself; provide positive feedback to the other candidate first, and focus on what would have worked better (instead of “you should have done …”); how you deliver the feedback is important