You have several options when pursuing your formal education goals: graduate programs in academic subjects (e.g., Master’s or Ph.D programs); professional programs (e.g., law school, medical school, dental school); post-diploma and professional programs at colleges that generally require a Bachelor’s degree to qualify for application and can sometimes exist as a joint program with a university; or other educational opportunities (e.g., courses offered through the Human Resources Professionals Association of Ontario or the Canadian Securities Institute).
Now that you have decided to enrol in a graduate or professional program, the first step is to choose the program that will best meet your needs. Talk to professors, admissions staff, graduate students, and alumni to help you determine which program to enter. Ask about each school’s reputation in the field. Contact the department or faculty of the school you want to attend to get further information; administrators may start a file based on this initial contact. Finally, a campus visit can go a long way towards helping you make an informed decision.
It may be helpful to find a professor who shares your interests and who will act as a mentor. This professor may be willing to help you identify the programs that are best suited to your interests and assist you in the selection and application processes. Also consider contacting the graduate student associations at your universities of interest as well as relevant professional associations: they may provide you with first-hand, up-to-date insights into programs.
As a Health Studies co-op student, Rachel McDonald spent five co-op work terms at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. She coordinated the rapid response radiotherapy program, which provides palliative radiation treatment to advanced cancer patients. Over five co-op terms, Rachel collected, analyzed and published data as the lead author on seven papers in peer-reviewed journals. She was even flown to Miami and Copenhagen to present research on quality of life and bone metastases.
Rachel was accepted into two of Canada’s most prestigious medical schools: Queens University and University of Toronto. Now, she is in her second year of medical school at the University of Toronto.
I think a lot of people underestimate the power of co-op. Work hard, be diligent and take initiative to do things outside of just what the position entails.
Rachel McDonald, co-op stream
Honours Science student Colin Whaley appreciated the consistency of the regular stream of study, which allowed him to tailor his classes and extracurriculars during his fall/winter study terms. In just five years, Colin was able to complete three honours thesis courses (biology, health and kinesiology), work as a Teaching Assistant and publish two papers. He also volunteered with campus clubs and services like the Campus Response Team and MATES Peer Counselling Group and even co-founded his own club that has sent around 100 volunteers to deliver technology training to seniors in long-term care homes and hospitals.
After working as a researcher at the Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre and completing the graduate program at the University of Waterloo’s School of Pharmacy, Colin was accepted to a number of Canadian medical schools. He will now be attending Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster University.
Get involved, build relationships and maintain an open mind towards different fields of research and practice. This can take you down some really interesting paths.
Colin Whaley, regular stream
It is important that you understand how your grades will be calculated, as each graduate and professional school has different rules and methods of evaluation.
They might look at one (or some) of the following factors:
If you are in co-op, your co-op sequence could affect the way your grades are calculated when applying to professional schools as some programs expect you to complete two study terms per academic year (typically from September-August) in order to count as a year of study or towards the grades in your GPA.
Graduate school grade calculations are not typically impacted by your co-op sequence.
Depending on where you will be applying, the application and start timelines, document conventions, and program structure may be different. It is important to research the conventions in the location you are applying to.
If you are applying outside of Canada you will need to meet immigration requirements in the country you will be living in. Immigration requirements vary widely; you will need to research them thoroughly as part of your planning. You may also need to show proof that you can pay tuition when you enter the country where you will study.
Depending on your immigration status in the country where you will study, you may be considered an international student. International students often pay higher tuition. Some programs in the United States give special status to Canadian applicants.
Some institutions have rolling admissions, which means applications are accepted at any time or before the advertised deadline. Admissions committees will review a complete file and make offers and funding decisions based on an applicant’s file. Applying early to a program can help you secure a spot before more competitive applications are received.
Some programs have several admission categories (e.g., regular, mature, special consideration, access). The Grade Point Average (GPA) requirement and admission test scores may vary based on competition from individuals in a particular applicant pool. It is not detrimental to apply to a category other than “regular.” Showing that you maintained a good GPA while dealing with special circumstances can work to your advantage.
Ascertain which of the following are required:
Identify what types and levels of previous education are required. For some professional programs, a completed undergraduate degree is not required. When applying to a graduate program, you usually need a degree in the same area, but not in every case.
If you are considering completing a graduate degree to boost your GPA to enter a professional program, be aware that most will not consider your graduate GPA. Most professional programs only consider your undergrad GPA.
Generally, no extra consideration is given if you are currently, or have been, a student at the university to which you are applying.
Some programs require certain prerequisites to assess whether an applicant is ready to successfully complete a program. Often prerequisite courses need to meet a GPA cutoff. Prerequisites can change, so keep up to date on each program’s requirements.
Check with the admission’s office about necessary prerequisites if the information is not clear on their website: you can send a course description (including the URL) and course syllabus for the course(s) you determine meets the prerequisite requirements. The more information provided to an admissions office, hopefully, the faster the response time. Try to obtain written confirmation from the admissions office, as a paper trail will provide proof that the courses you have completed meet the school’s requirements. There are many programs that will not evaluate prerequisites until you have completed and paid for the application. Some institutions provide a list of courses accepted from other universities.
Some programs allow you to complete prerequisites as late as the term prior to the program start date, while others do not. Always verify the latest date of graduation (or prerequisite completion) accepted.
Please note that staff in the Centre for Career Development cannot advise you about whether courses meet a program’s prerequisites.
Admission requirements usually state the minimum GPA required to be admitted to a program. If this is not clear, contact the school to find out the GPA requirement and how it is computed. Different possibilities might include: a cumulative average, your grades for the last two years, your grades in your major, the last year of study, or marks in courses related to the program, and so on. The minimum requirement varies by program and a competitive GPA is typically higher than the minimum. The minimum GPA for a Master’s program is usually 75%. If you have a lower GPA in your last or last one or two years of study, this will be a red flag for admissions officers, as it can be interpreted to indicate either that you will not be successful in a graduate program, or that you have not grasped the core concepts required for a graduate/professional program.
The required GPA for professional programs tends to be in the low 80’s. If applying while completing a 4-year degree, most programs only consider 4A term marks and earlier, or in some cases 3B marks and earlier.
Institutions use either a 10-point or a 4-point scale, so it is important to ask how your average will be converted. Visit the program website to see if GPAs are posted for previous years. If you are applying to faculties of law, medicine, or rehab sciences in Ontario, the Ontario Universities’ Application Centre (OUAC) has GPA conversion charts published for each type of program.
For an international or exchange term, the program may need a World Education Service (WES) conversion of your grades. Allow enough time for grade conversion through WES or to order and send transcripts by the deadline date.
When applying to any graduate or professional program, check if an admission test is required and what the deadline is for score submission. If an admission test score is required, be aware that stellar results can often balance out a mediocre GPA, and that, conversely, the opposite is also true.
Some programs accept test scores after the application deadline. In most cases, test results are available four to six weeks after the test date. If you are applying to a program with rolling admissions, a complete application package (including test scores) is required before your application can be evaluated.
Prepare thoroughly for the test you need to write; plan to write it just once. At the same time, though, it is advisable that you write an admission test early enough that you could rewrite it if necessary. Determine how recent your score must be for any given application, plus how multiple scores are handled (e.g., do they consider the highest score, or do they take an average of all scores achieved?). Do not write an admission test the first time without preparing just to “try it out,” as admission committees sometimes have access to score cancellations. Note that there is a waiting period for retaking admission tests and that they can often only be retaken a limited number of times.
Allow enough time to register for the test, order study materials, study, and, if desired, attend a preparation course. Some University of Waterloo clubs on campus hold practice tests, so check their websites for information. The Centre for Career Development has practice test books that you can borrow. A link to admission test information is available on the Centre for Career Development website. Some admission tests are written at a computer-based testing centre. On the test date, you may be required to provide a list of schools that you are applying to.
Here is a list of admission tests:
The Graduate Records Examination (GRE) may be required for application to graduate schools. There is a GRE general test and a GRE subject test, but not all schools require both test results. The GRE general test is written at a computer-based testing site and has several sections: verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, and analytical writing. Contact the programs to which you are applying to determine if they use the results from every section. Doing so may help you to decide if you need to rewrite the test if your test results were low in certain sections.
The GRE subject test is a paper-based test written at testing sites across Canada. The test can be taken as often as it is offered (i.e., April, October, and November). If your scores are good, it may be to your advantage to submit them to all schools, even to those that do not require them.
The GRE is generally not required by Canadian programs if your undergraduate education was completed in Canada or the United States, but it is almost always required for graduate programs in the United States.
Only you can decide if you want to take an admission-test preparation course. Be sure to do your research to determine the value of such preparation. It is recommended that you check whether: the course fits your learning style; the course is offered online or in-person; the course is available weekends or evenings; the instructor’s experience teaching the course materials is substantial; the course covers topic content, strategies, practice tests, or too much of any one of these; the duration of the course is manageable. A longer course is not necessarily better; some companies include the amount of time spent on practice tests in their total time calculations. It is useful to use previously administered tests as a preparation tool. These are often available through the test registration site. If possible, complete practice tests in the format in which you will have to write: paper or computer-based. Each company has different teaching strategies and it can be confusing to use multiple sources of information. Some companies provide University of Waterloo students discounts; for details, visit the list of preparation courses on the Centre for Career Development’s website.
Some programs have language proficiency requirements. If your native language is English OR you have completed the four full years of your undergraduate degree at an English speaking institution, a test is generally not required. Some programs may waive the admission test scores if you can provide proof of proficiency from other sources such as courses, but if they recommend you take it — do it!
You may need to take the International English Language Testing System (IELTS); the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL); Test of Written English (TWE); or Test of English as a Foreign Language, Test of Spoken English (TOEFL TSE).
Ascertain if any type of experience is necessary to a successful application (i.e., volunteer, extra-curricular, or work). If so, consider which type(s) are required and what would be the most relevant experiences within each type (e.g., work experience is mandatory when applying to most MBA programs). If you are applying to a graduate program, research experience can be a plus. If you are applying to a health-related professional program, in most cases experience from within the profession is necessary. Use experiences from work, volunteering, extra-curricular activities, memberships in clubs/teams, and shadowing to show the depth of your understanding about the profession you want to enter in your application.
Well-rounded students who show leadership qualities, relate well to others, and possess organizational skills have an edge in the application process. In fact, according to Scholarships Canada, involvement in extra-curricular activities can greatly increase your chances of receiving a scholarship. However, admission committees also recognize that over-involvement in such activities can adversely affect your GPA, so be sure to engage only in the number of activities that you can effectively manage.
Professional Associations and Clubs (Applied Health Sciences Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Arts Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Engineering Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Environment Faculty) (PDF)
Even though many students apply to research-based Master’s programs without any research experience, having it can provide a competitive advantage. It is highly recommended that if you apply for a direct entry Ph.D program that you do get prior research experience. Start thinking about what interests you, and try to gain experience in this area. This will help you find a program and potential supervisor. The University of Waterloo library site has an extensive list of research databases to view journal articles and find what fascinates you.
To gain research experiences seek out opportunities such as the NSERC Undergraduate Research Awards (USRA) positions. Applications for an NSERC USRA are very competitive. Some departments offer University Research Assistantships that could provide research experience.
Securing an Undergraduate Research Internship (URI) would allow you to hold a research position with a professor; these opportunities are managed by Co-operative and Experiential Education and the program is open to regular and co-op students. Be proactive and approach a professor, tell them about the program, and provide the URL so they can complete the application.
Another option is to volunteer in a lab on campus where permitted. You could run experiments or even conduct basic literature reviews for professors or grad students. Approach faculty members and explain how your skills and background will be an asset to their research. Consider the faculty member’s perspective and do not focus just on what you will get out of the experience.
Often your fourth year design project or final thesis course and paper will provide research exposure. If you are in a co-op program, you can look for research-based work terms at Waterloo, other institutions, or in industry.
Seek to publish your work whenever possible. It will be especially important if applying to a Ph.D program — giving you a competitive edge. You do not have to be the first author. Take any opportunity to contribute to a study, write up a journal article, or participate in a conference presentation/abstract.
Talk to a faculty member to find out how you could turn your senior-year course project into a publication.
What is CASPer®?
CASPer® (Computer–based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics) is an admissions test that assesses interpersonal and non–cognitive skills like communication, collaboration, interpersonal, ethical–decision making, empathy, compassion, integrity, etc. through a scenario–based format. The scenarios are largely ethical in nature and the questions asked gauge your personal attributes and characteristics using concrete examples of real–world situations.
CASPer® is not a knowledge–based test.
Who uses CASPer®?
CASPer® is increasingly being used by many professional programs, and is common health–related programs such as medicine, nursing, optometry, pharmacy, and more. Programs can add CASPer® to their list of requirements for any application cycle, so check the information for the year of your application cycle.
How do I find out if I need CASPer®?
There are two ways to find out if you need to take CASPer® for your application(s):
What is the CASPer® testing process like?
CASPer® is a computer–based online test, meaning you can take this test in any environment with a reliable internet connection and minimal distractions. The test is 90 minutes in length and is comprised of 10–12 sections. Each section will present a video or written scenario. You can only watch the video or read the written passage once per scenario. Following each scenario, applicants are required to type out an answer three questions in five minutes. Each response is graded by a different marker, so 10–12 people mark your CASPer® test.
Very few schools are explicit about the possible ways that CASPer® scores are used in their admission decisions.
How many times do I need to take the test?
You will need to take the test at least once for every year you apply, as your test scores are only valid for one year.
Generally, the content of the CASPer® test is unique to each program type and country, so you may need to take the test more than once in a cycle if you are applying to multiple program types. However, if you are applying to the professions of dentistry, medicine and optometry in Canada you will write the test once during an admissions cycle. If you are applying to both Canadian and US medical schools, you need to write the US and Canadian CASPer® test.
How can I prepare for CASPer®?
There are many different ways you could prepare yourself for the CASPer® test. There isn’t one right way to prepare for this or any other admissions test. But in general, exposing yourself to the testing format, familiarizing yourself with relevant content, and finding an approach that works for you so you can structure your thoughts and move through the content quickly are key to doing your best.
Check the Test Prep page of CASPer®’s website for their tips to prepare for your test day.
You can test out some common strategies and see which ones help you to best organize your thoughts and make sure that you’re addressing all the questions.
If you are looking for more specific tips and tricks to help you prepare and be successful writing CASPer®, think about some combination of these options:
If you’re not sure where to start, drop by the Centre for Career Development library in the Tatham Centre.
How should I format my responses?
There isn’t one right format for a CASPer® response, but finding a format or strategy that works well for you can help you respond effectively and avoid getting bogged down in organizational details that have little bearing on how your response is scored. Test out different options and see which works best for you and the way your brain likes to organize information. Here’s one example:
Here’s one recommended format on how to approach CASPer®:
Due to the limited time to answer each question it may be helpful to use this format:
Are there test prep courses for CASPer®?
There are companies that offer CASPer® prep courses; however, UWaterloo students that provided feedback after writing CASPer® do not think they are necessary, nor do Admission Directors. At minimum, it will be helpful to understand the CASPer® format and strategies on how to write it.
Should you decide that practice and preparation are useful for you, check out the preparation program supported by CASPer® here.
What kinds of questions will they ask?
Generally, they’re asking reflective questions about your approach or action–oriented response to a specific scenario. The scenarios are ethical in nature, meaning there is no one right answer and typically multiple perspectives to be considered. The scenarios and following questions may or may not be health–related, but they certainly will relate to your ability to analyze a complex situation and communicate with others. Here are some examples to start:
Example 1
Video shows two people arguing about a convicted pedophile, John, who will be released soon from jail and will be living in their neighbourhood. Do you agree with this decision to release John?
Questions:
Example 2
Personal Descriptor CASPer® example: Consider the experiences you have and insight gained from these experiences that led you to believe that you would be a good physician.
Questions:
Example 3
Video of Head of Athletic Department talking to a mother who was complaining about her child not being selected for a team. Mother’s question at the end of the scenario was “Are you going to continue to allow this?”
Questions:
Example 4
Personal Descriptor CASPer® example: Talk about a stressful situation you have encountered.
Follow–up questions:
Can I get access to sample questions from previous tests?
Yes, it is possible to access question banks with CASPer® scenarios and questions to aid in your preparation beyond what’s available on the CASPer® website itself. The strength of third–party resources and their proximity to actual CASPer® scenarios depends highly on the specific resource and the extent to which the banks get updated each application cycle.
Unlike the MCAT, it’s not necessary to make use of extensive question banks to be successful, and these resources can be costly. If this option doesn’t work for you, that’s okay! Think about using some of the other strategies mentioned here. If you still have questions about the best method for you, you can connect with a Further Education Advisor in a drop–in to start a conversation.
Check if references are required and, if so, the number and type (academic or non-academic). Many programs require two academic references (meaning professors — although exceptions can be made for those who have been out of school for some time), while some ask for one academic and one non-academic. Examples of non-academic references are coaches, volunteer supervisors, and employers. If there are no guidelines on which type of reference is required, academic reference letters are usually highly valued, as your referee should be able to speak to your ability to be successful in a professional/graduate school.
Evaluate who can best provide a non-academic reference letter. Asking someone with a prestigious title, but who cannot provide any substance on your capabilities (with proof) will add no value to your application. Consider first what you want discussed in your reference letter and then find people who can provide that information.
Ask your potential referees in person: “Will you have time to write a strong supporting reference letter?” Then listen to how the individual responds. If you detect any hesitation, try to find someone else. Individuals could be reluctant to write a letter of reference if they have little to say that is positive about your work, or alternatively if they have little memory of you. Many referees will try to let you down easily in such cases. Providing them a way to say “no” can help ensure that you obtain only the most positive of references for your application, whereas including references from individuals who indicate that they do not know you well can be very detrimental to your application.
If your referee is unsure of what to include in the reference letter, suggest that they: include their credentials/accomplishments; provide proof about your abilities/attributes; and share what you accomplished in the course/work term (e.g., assignments, presentations, grades received), difficulty of course/work experience, and comparison of you to other successful students.
It is recommended that you cultivate relationships throughout your university experience, so that when the time comes to ask potential referees to write a letter, you have some choices. Many students worry about how to go about doing this, as they may not feel close enough to their professors to be memorable. But there are ways to tackle this challenge. Pick a professor from whom you have taken several classes, or one to whom you have submitted a particularly strong essay or project. Visit the professor during his or her office hours, or ask questions after class. Show that you are interested in the class content, and that you have a goal to attend graduate school or a professional program. You can mention through this process that in the future you hope that they might write a reference letter for you. This may help them to pay more attention to you. Start establishing these connections today.
Give referees enough time to write effective letters. Ask 4 to 6 weeks in advance for a reference letter, and provide the form, addressed envelope with postage (if necessary), your personal statement/letter of intent, a list of projects completed in their courses, admission requirements, and your résumé — anything that will help their task of writing a letter. Provide a general idea of why you want to attend that particular professional/graduate program, as well as what areas of the field interest you. Ask if your referee requires more information to write your letter.
Sometimes you will be given the option of an “open” versus a “closed” reference letter. An open letter means that you can read it prior to submission; however, it is best not to choose this option as such letters are not viewed as favourably as “closed,” and thus confidential, letters.
If you are not using a centralized application centre, referees will need to provide you with a reference letter for each program or school to which you are applying. These programs will require referees to submit references either directly to the program (electronically after you have provided their name/contact information, or by mail) or in a sealed envelope with a signature across the closing to the applicant. The application process might indicate when your references have been received, so you can use this information to follow-up and remind your referees if necessary. If you apply through a centralized application service, each referee completes only one reference form or letter, which is submitted directly to the application centre for distribution to each institution.
Admission committees look for specific examples of academic abilities as well as discipline, persistence, and responsibility. If a reference form is required, read through the different categories a referee needs to complete because this information may help you identify whom to ask to complete the form and reference letter. Always remember to send a thank-you note to your referee(s).
Transcripts need to be ordered directly from the school(s) you attended unless you are currently enrolled in, or have graduated from, an Ontario university or college and are applying through OUAC. In the latter case, submit a transcript request form to OUAC, and your transcripts will be ordered and forwarded to the institutions to which you are applying. If you are applying to a program at a school that you have already attended, you may not be required to submit a transcript.
It is always a good idea to check your unofficial transcript to ensure it is accurate. Allow enough time to order and have transcripts sent to the school to which you are applying. (At the University of Waterloo this is from the Registrar‘s Office for undergraduate transcripts and the Graduate Studies Office for graduate transcripts.) You may be asked to submit the transcript with your application package in a sealed, signed envelope. Check the admission requirements to determine if a final transcript needs to be sent after you complete your degree.
Graduate degree programs may begin in January, May, or September, and applications are generally due between December and February (for a September start date). In Ontario, applications to certain programs are made through OUAC. The online application becomes available approximately three months prior to the deadline. It usually takes between 5 to 25 to complete an application, so allow yourself enough time to do a thorough job. You do not need to complete the application in one sitting; you can enter and exit the application until you decide you are ready to submit. The following are applications available through OUAC:
If applying to professional programs outside Ontario, contact each institution to check the number of applicants accepted from out of province. Apply directly to each institution. In many cases, an online application form is used.
If your application process involves an interview, please review the Interviewing pages within this Further education section to learn more about graduate/professional school interviews.
If you receive an offer from your second-choice school, contact your first-choice school to see if you can accelerate its decision. If you receive a letter stating you are on a waiting list, determine if you can take steps to increase the likelihood of being accepted. It may be possible to provide additional reference letters and other information to show how your skills and experience have grown since your original application. If possible, visit schools and try to meet with decision makers. And, if you know a faculty member with connections to your program or institution of choice, ask him or her to speak to the admissions committee on your behalf.
Although many students strengthen their qualifications and reapply, it is important to be realistic (i.e., know when and how to develop a viable alternative that will still allow you to realize many of your goals).
If you are unsure of your interests or goals, or don‘t have a parallel plan, please review the Decision-making section of CareerHub.
A Naturopathic doctor (ND) practices a holistic form of medicine. There are two English–speaking naturopathic programs in Canada. The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine (CCNM) is located in Toronto and The Boucher Institute of Naturopathic Medicine (BINM) is located in BC.
To apply to these programs submit your application through the Naturopathic Doctor Centralized Application Service (NDCAS) application portal.
You must pass the Naturopathic Physicians Licensing Exams (NPLEX) before you can practise as a naturopath. Students take Part I after second year of naturopathic med school (before clinical clerkships), and Part II after graduation. Passing the exams is required to qualify for a provincial license. Ontario also has a licensing exam. In order to practice in the province of Ontario, an ND requires a valid license from the College of Naturopaths of Ontario (CONO).
Please see the link in the Activities section below to plan your individual timeline.
A competitive cumulative GPA to enter an ND program is 77–79%. A 4–year degree is required for BINM; CCNM will accept either a 3– or 4–year degree.
Pre–requisites with minimum grades of 60% or higher are required for both Canadian programs.
References, a personal statement and a resume are required for the application. If you make it to the next stage of the application process you will be invited for an interview.
Please review the Activities section below for some tips on writing a personal statement.
The Centre for Career Development offers one on one support for individuals applying to graduate programs. Please fill out the further education request form if this is of interest to you.
Standard interview format is when candidates are asked a series of questions in front of one or more admission panelists. The main portion of the interview consists of the interviewer asking you questions to try to determine your fit. Generally, you have an opportunity to ask any questions that you may have at the end of the interview.
Practice your interview skills by signing up for the Professional School Interviews (Standard) workshop.
Behaviour-based interviews are designed to elicit information about how you have performed in the past because past behaviour is a good indicator of how you will function in the future. Interviewers develop their questions around the traits and skills they consider necessary for succeeding in a profession. Occasionally, behaviour-based questions are used in the MMI interview format as well. These questions usually begin with phrases such as:
Some applicants find the format of such questions difficult to understand and have trouble responding. However, if you have done your research and have prepared for the interview, you will have work, academic, volunteer, and life experiences ready to share. You can prepare for behaviour-based questions by recalling specific instances that demonstrate your accomplishments, abilities, and fit for the profession/field. Be certain to tell the truth, get to the point, stay focused and positive, and be consistent with your responses. Common behaviour-based interview themes include the following:
Next Step: Work through your résumé to find specific examples for each theme above. Use the STAR approach to describe each example.
The “STAR Approach” is a useful technique for answering behaviour-based questions:
Situation: Provide Background and context:
Task: Describe what you needed to do
Action: Explain what you actually did and how you did it
Result: Describe the outcome of your actions
For example, in response to the query “What experience do you have organizing projects?” you determine that the qualification being evaluated is organizational skills. Your skill/knowledge/ability statement could be, “I have developed excellent organizational skills by working on two major projects. The one I would like to tell you about ended successfully six months ago.”
Every statement you make must be true. Don’t lie or embellish. Ideally, the example you choose should be something that requires a competency similar to the typical work of the prospective professional. If you do not have a similar experience to relate, try to choose the most relevant story from your academic, extracurricular or volunteer activities — do not make it up! Describe the what, who, when, where, why, and how, and talk about the successful outcome or what you learned from the experience.
As you tell the story allow the interviewer to see or live through the action with you. Choose words that will help the interviewer visualize you in the experience (e.g., “It was five minutes before closing on the busiest night of the year when the power went out...”). Whenever possible, include positive feedback from supervisors, colleagues, professors, and others to reinforce your accomplishment. Humour, if used appropriately, can also be an effective tool, because it helps the interviewer to remember you.
The next step is the one that most candidates forget. Tell the interviewer what specific benefits or competitive advantage you can bring to the profession/field because of the experience you have just described. For example, “As part of the team being formed, I would be able to coordinate....” Avoid generic statements such as, “All professions need people with leadership ability.”
An interviewer will use situational/hypothetical questions to establish how you would react to and handle real-life situations. For situational/hypothetical questions, candidates must have a good understanding of the profession and its requirements. Here are some examples of this type of question:
When answering problem-solving questions demonstrate your ability to process information quickly, think logically, and solve creatively. Interviewers place emphasis on the thought process rather than on the conclusion. Examples of problem-solving questions include the following:
The key is not to worry about getting the “right” answer but, rather, to demonstrate your logical thought process in solving the problem. The following five-step process is appropriate for handling most problem-solving questions:
Keep in mind, there is no right answer, only your answer.
In addition to asking the other types of questions mentioned, many interviewers rely on a series of standard questions, and you should prepare for them. Occasionally, classic interview questions are used in the MMI interview format as well.
While preparation is key, it is not possible to predict and prepare for all interview questions. Instead, review your résumé, application, and research the profession (current and future state). Then put information into different categories (e.g., accomplishments, understanding of profession, unique qualities, challenges/weaknesses) enabling you to provide examples as necessary.
The “PAWS” model is a useful method for answering classic questions such as “Tell me about yourself” and “Why do you want to be a ___________?”
When an interviewer asks this question, s/he is looking for those aspects of your life that are relevant to the profession/field, such as how you became interested in the field, related experience, and courses taken. “PAWS” stands for Profile, Academic, Work, and Skills. Include all or as many of the four (in any order) to reinforce your fit for the field/profession.
Here are some examples of what to discuss in each of the four areas:
Profile: Mention how you became interested in this field and point out any relevant community involvement, extracurricular activities, memberships, and personal interests that further demonstrate your commitment to the field
Academic: Talk about your educational background (degrees/diplomas/certifications) and other related training and professional development initiatives/courses that you have participated in
Work: Highlight paid or unpaid (volunteer) experiences related to the profession
Skills: Refer to specific skills/competencies that relate to the profession or field (e.g., communication, interpersonal, time management, problem-solving skills)
Please read Delivering bad news stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews.
Please read Ethical scenario stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews
To supplement the information you obtained before the interview, you should ask questions during the interview (although you will not have this opportunity with MMI interviews). Some questions will arise naturally during the interview, but it is wise to prepare a number of questions in advance. Asking questions will demonstrate your interest and help you determine if the program/school fits your personality, skills, interests, and values.
Your questions should pertain to the program/school and show your enthusiasm and knowledge. By asking intelligent, well-thought-out questions that genuinely matter to you, you will convince the interviewer that you are serious about the program and institution. If a question has been answered during the interview, do not ask it again; such repetition will suggest that you were not listening. It is important to compose your own questions; however, the following may give you a starting point:
Interviews are part of the process of gaining admission to some graduate/professional programs (e.g., health-related professions, business, and, occasionally graduate school and faculties of education). Interviews occur after the application deadline. The fact that you have been invited for a graduate/ professional school interview shows that you have met the preliminary requirements.
Interviews are either standard/panel style (i.e., candidates are asked a series of questions) or a multiple-mini interview (MMI) format (i.e., candidates move through a series of stations). Some programs conduct MMIs followed by standard interviews.
To deliver a well-executed answer, use a framework to provide structure to your answer:
Anticipating possible questions helps you to prepare points to include in your answers. Think about why a question is being asked. What does the interviewer really want to know? Review your application, résumé, and past experiences to see how they fit with the appropriate competencies necessary for your field/profession. Colleges and other regulatory bodies associated with your profession will have information on the essential skills and competencies required. In addition to the profession specific competencies, for most health professions, an understanding of the CanMEDS competencies is recommended. Try creating a similar chart demonstrating your experiences/skills/competencies with specific examples:
Experience/skill/competency | Example (story) |
---|---|
Communication |
Tutoring: adapting teaching style for different clients |
Collaboration |
Work: team project across departments |
Leadership |
Varsity volleyball: captain role on team |
Advocacy |
Stand Up to Stigma: raising awareness |
Scholar/Research |
Research Assistant: understanding research and ethics approval process |
Professionalism |
Fundraiser: liaising with businesses and tactfully collecting donations |
Knowledge |
Academic courses: understanding of social determinants of health |
Research your specific program and institution to know how you fit with the mission and curriculum, and also what you can bring to the school. Practise all of your answers out loud to hear where you stumble and pause, and to be comfortable with your examples.
The interview is an exchange of information between you and the interviewer(s). It is used to help assess interest in, and suitability (i.e., competencies) for the program of study, and fit for the field/profession. To make this assessment, the interview committee will endeavour to obtain information about your skills, values (personal ethics), personality, and interests. Interviewers may be interested in your integrity (personal and professional accountability), maturity, compassion, sincerity, honesty, originality, curiosity, intelligence, confidence, motivation, leadership skills, communication skills, ability to relate to others, cultural and social interests, work and volunteer experiences, knowledge of relevant issues and events, and, in some cases, your ability to withstand the emotional/physical demands of the profession.
Succeeding in an interview may depend on your professional appearance and the interviewer’s first impression of you. If the first impression is not positive, it will be difficult to change the interviewer’s mind during the rest of the interview.
Arrive early, dressed in attire appropriate for the type of admissions interview you are attending. For health and business-related interviews dress conservatively and keep fashion accessories to a minimum. Avoid wearing strong scents (or any at all) because many people have environmental allergies. Ensure your cell phone is turned off.
Greet each person with respect and professionalism. When you shake hands, make eye contact and smile. Handshakes should be firm but not aggressive; try to match the grip of the interviewer. Standard North American practice is to shake hands at the beginning and end of an interview. However, if you are not comfortable with this practice tell the interviewer that you prefer not to shake hands and why. It is good etiquette to wait to sit down until the interviewer invites you to do so.
Don’t worry about being a little nervous during the interview; being nervous is normal and expected. Remember, the interviewer wants you to have the right qualifications and interest in the profession. Many interviewers will begin the interview with some “small talk” to help you relax. This may seem irrelevant to the program, but you are still being evaluated; be sure to demonstrate a positive attitude.
To demonstrate effectively your suitability and value, you must know yourself. Review your self-assessment information, volunteer experiences, application, personal statement/letter of intent, and your résumé. Be prepared to give examples to substantiate all claims. Some interviewers will want you to talk about your mistakes and what lessons you learned from them. Ensure that your responses are sufficiently detailed. This is especially important in “closed” or “blind” interviews where committee members may not have been privy to your complete application.
Review professional and regulatory bodies’ websites to be familiar with the current profession, future directions, and the competencies important for someone in the field. It is important to demonstrate your genuine interest in and fit for the profession. Read the notes you made as you reviewed print and online materials, during volunteer opportunities/job shadowing, and when you talked with others. Keep current with events and new research. Many of the MMI stations will be relevant to current topics in the news, both health- and non-health related. The best way to gather this information is to follow the news, review association websites, and to speak with professionals in the field. Your interpersonal skills will be a particularly important factor in people-focused professions as you will be required to be approachable and to work closely with patients/students/clients.
To prepare for the interview, ensure that you research the faculty/program and, if appropriate, the interviewers’ areas of expertise in order to understand the nuances of each. If possible, visit the campus and talk to current students in the program, attend classes, and visit labs.
The order in which you deliver the content of your answer indicates your priorities. For example if your answer to: “Why do you want to be a doctor?” is “... to help patients, conduct research, teach” this will create a more positive impression than “... a high income, prestige, to help patients.”
Awkward situations may occur during an interview, and it is up to you to be prepared to confidently handle whatever happens. To increase your confidence and preparation for an interview, practise. Check for quality of information in your answers and the positive, non-verbal reinforcement of your words. By practising responses out loud, you can hear your answers and assess their effectiveness. But don’t practise so much that you lose your spontaneity and your answers sound rehearsed.
The key to tricky situations is to remember that barriers to admission can often be overcome by focusing on the positive. Circumstances that you may find problematic are:
If you answer a question and there is no prompt response or follow-up question, try to remain calm and collected. Silence may not be a negative sign; the interviewer could be taking time to process and record your answer, and/or be considering the next question.
In response to uncomfortable silence, ask the interviewers if they require any further details regarding your last response, shifting the responsibility to them. Resist the temptation to ramble because you may provide irrelevant information that may hurt your chances of being offered admission.
Although the interviewer will likely take notes, generally you should not. If you have your head down writing, the conversation will be uncomfortable and unengaging because of your lack of eye contact and inability to show enthusiasm.
Making brief notes is acceptable when you need to record information that may be easily forgotten, such as a key word, phone number, or contact information. If you fear you may not recall other pertinent details, document the information immediately after the interview.
You may have difficulty communicating your thoughts clearly and concisely, especially when you are not sure how to respond to a question. The key is to remain calm and positive, focus on the question, and continue to remind yourself that you are doing well. You may request clarification if you are not sure what the interviewer is asking, or pause and politely ask for a few moments to consider your response; however, don’t take too much time because interviewers want to see that you can think well under pressure.
After a brief pause, if you still cannot respond to the interviewer’s question, you may ask to defer your answer to the end of the interview. The risk is that interviews usually follow a certain structure and the question might be missed entirely, leaving the interviewer with an unanswered question. If you’re stumped because you simply do not know the answer, be honest with the interviewer and, depending on the type of question, discuss how you would handle the situation or resources you would use to find the answer.
Interviewers will often ask negatively phrased questions to assess your perceived weaknesses and strengths. The following are a few examples:
Be honest and discuss a real weakness or past event that would not negatively impact performance for the profession/field you are applying for. Avoid the popular advice to turn a weakness into a strength (e.g., “I’m a perfectionist...”) because this kind of response is unconvincing and over used. Be sure to end your “weakness” response on a positive note by indicating what steps you are taking to overcome the weakness.
It is important to keep your answers short and to be as positive as possible, even when answering a negatively framed question.
It is a pleasure to be interviewed by someone who is enthusiastic about the profession, but it is not desirable if you aren’t able to market yourself because the interviewer monopolizes the discussion. Tactfully break into the conversation to help keep the interview focused on the subject you know best: you! You might say, “I had a similar experience...” or “It’s interesting that you say that because I am also skilled in...”
Is your body or verbal language contributing to the problem? Without being rude, offer less acknowledgement (e.g., nodding, “that’s interesting,” “really?”). If you are not given adequate time to market your qualifications and the interview is drawing to a close, request a few moments to summarize your qualifications for the profession/field, highlighting key points you had planned to discuss.
What should you do if you’re in the middle of an interview and have just been asked what is clearly an illegal question? There is no clear-cut answer. Much depends on you.
In some cases, you may be able to answer the “hidden” question. Think of what information the interviewer is trying to elicit. For example, “Do you have or plan to have children?” may indicate a concern about your ability to put in the time to complete the program.
You may elect to say “Why do you ask?” or “Would you explain how this point is connected to the qualifications for this program?” This could cause the interviewer to reconsider or clarify the question. It may offend some interviewers, but probably not the majority.
If you feel that you should not answer the question (you shouldn’t have to, after all) or that you are not interested in attending the program, you may state, “I don’t feel obligated to answer that” or “That question is inappropriate.” If you choose this option, you will either enlighten (the interviewer may not realize it is illegal and will be happy that you pointed it out), or offend (the interviewer may not consider you for the program). At some schools there is a post-interview evaluation, so a candidate can report illegal questions.
It is best not to bring up your religious beliefs in your answers. Interviewers for health-related professions could worry that when you are practising in your profession, and not being supervised, you might present different religious options to a patient and this isn’t the expected practice. As a health-care provider you need to look at things objectively and not present your own ideologies.
Smile when appropriate during the interview. Be enthusiastic and responsive. As you talk about your past and present activities, your passion and energy can be communicated both through your words and your body language (e.g., an excited tone of voice, leaning forward, nodding your head in agreement). Maintaining eye contact is important; failure to do so may imply a lack of confidence or, worse, cause the interviewer to question your truthfulness.
Sit comfortably, without slouching. Don’t put anything on your lap or in your hands if it will restrict your natural body movement or if you may be tempted to play with it. Keep your clipboard, note pad, briefcase, or portfolio on the floor beside your chair for easy retrieval.
Respond to questions specifically and concisely but give sufficient details to enable the interviewer to evaluate your credentials. Interviewers become frustrated when they have to listen to long, rambling answers. Think before you speak. It is quite acceptable to pause before talking in order to organize your thoughts. Avoid verbal fillers such as “um,” “ah,” “you know,” or regularly repeating the question to provide thinking time.
Use professional language. Avoid slang. Speak clearly. Watch the interviewer for clues on how the interview is progressing. Is the interviewer’s face or body language telling you that your answers are too long, not detailed enough, too boring? If in doubt, ask the interviewer if more or fewer details are needed.
Prepare in advance to talk about any topic that you feel uncomfortable about. If there is something that you don’t want an interviewer to inquire about, it will likely be raised during the interview. Practise your answer out loud often enough to feel confident, and to decrease your emotions surrounding the answer (e.g., “Tell me about your most painful experience”). Maintain poise and self-control. Consider a difficult issue as a learning opportunity that has made you a better person.
This is an interview where one interviewer conducts an interview with one candidate. This is typical for MBA and graduate school interviews.
For health-related interviews it is common for there to be a panel of interviewers. Often this consists of a faculty member or someone in the profession, a current student, and a community member. Each interviewer will be assessing you differently (e.g., a community member will assess if they would choose you as a professional).
Although it is important to have good eye contact with the person who asks you a question, also look at the other interviewers frequently to include them in the discussion. Try to remember each person’s name and use his or her name during the interview.
The interview process often includes meeting with current students and a tour of the site, so wear comfortable shoes.
If given the choice between an on- or off-campus interview (common for MBA), try to arrange an on-campus interview. This will give you the opportunity to talk to current students, sit in on a class, see the campus, and get a better sense whether this is the right school and location for you. However, if you are not able to attend an on-campus interview, you will not be penalized.
All of the usual advice about interview skills still applies. Your attire is your choice, but you may find that dressing professionally increases your confidence and allows you to perform better. Keep your application, school information, points that you want to highlight, and list of questions handy; in fact, keep these in front of you during the interview for easy reference. (Don’t shuffle your papers though!) Have a pen and paper available to note any comments or questions that may occur to you during the interview. Choose your words carefully and be succinct. It is also important to vary your voice tone, tempo, and pitch to keep the interviewer’s attention. Ensure that you are in a private setting to eliminate any distractions or background noise.
In this type of interview, interviewers use video technology to conduct interviews at a distance. Use the same strategies as you would if you were meeting in person. Depending on the sophistication of the technology, you may experience short transmission delays. Make eye contact with the camera, which, to the interviewer, appears as direct “eye contact.” Remember to check the monitor periodically to observe the interviewer’s body language.
After each interview, evaluate how well you did by completing the following “Interview evaluation worksheet”
Save this list to record how you perform during interviews and to document your progress.
Chiropractic, naturopathic medicine, osteopathic medicine, physician assistant, and veterinary medicine programs also have an interview process. Typically, the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College and the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine have standard panel formats. Osteopathic medicine schools in the United States, the physician assistant programs at McMaster University and the University of Toronto, and the Ontario Veterinary College at the University of Guelph hold MMI interviews. Health-related programs at the Michener Institute in Toronto host MMI interviews as well, and regardless of the program applied to at the Michener Institute, candidates move through the same stations.
Information on interview process and format often changes. The most up-to-date information for each school can be found on each program’s individual website.
You have several options when pursuing your formal education goals: graduate programs in academic subjects (e.g., Master’s or Ph.D programs); professional programs (e.g., law school, medical school, dental school); post-diploma and professional programs at colleges that generally require a Bachelor’s degree to qualify for application and can sometimes exist as a joint program with a university; or other educational opportunities (e.g., courses offered through the Human Resources Professionals Association of Ontario or the Canadian Securities Institute).
Now that you have decided to enrol in a graduate or professional program, the first step is to choose the program that will best meet your needs. Talk to professors, admissions staff, graduate students, and alumni to help you determine which program to enter. Ask about each school’s reputation in the field. Contact the department or faculty of the school you want to attend to get further information; administrators may start a file based on this initial contact. Finally, a campus visit can go a long way towards helping you make an informed decision.
It may be helpful to find a professor who shares your interests and who will act as a mentor. This professor may be willing to help you identify the programs that are best suited to your interests and assist you in the selection and application processes. Also consider contacting the graduate student associations at your universities of interest as well as relevant professional associations: they may provide you with first-hand, up-to-date insights into programs.
As a Health Studies co-op student, Rachel McDonald spent five co-op work terms at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. She coordinated the rapid response radiotherapy program, which provides palliative radiation treatment to advanced cancer patients. Over five co-op terms, Rachel collected, analyzed and published data as the lead author on seven papers in peer-reviewed journals. She was even flown to Miami and Copenhagen to present research on quality of life and bone metastases.
Rachel was accepted into two of Canada’s most prestigious medical schools: Queens University and University of Toronto. Now, she is in her second year of medical school at the University of Toronto.
I think a lot of people underestimate the power of co-op. Work hard, be diligent and take initiative to do things outside of just what the position entails.
Rachel McDonald, co-op stream
Honours Science student Colin Whaley appreciated the consistency of the regular stream of study, which allowed him to tailor his classes and extracurriculars during his fall/winter study terms. In just five years, Colin was able to complete three honours thesis courses (biology, health and kinesiology), work as a Teaching Assistant and publish two papers. He also volunteered with campus clubs and services like the Campus Response Team and MATES Peer Counselling Group and even co-founded his own club that has sent around 100 volunteers to deliver technology training to seniors in long-term care homes and hospitals.
After working as a researcher at the Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre and completing the graduate program at the University of Waterloo’s School of Pharmacy, Colin was accepted to a number of Canadian medical schools. He will now be attending Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster University.
Get involved, build relationships and maintain an open mind towards different fields of research and practice. This can take you down some really interesting paths.
Colin Whaley, regular stream
It is important that you understand how your grades will be calculated, as each graduate and professional school has different rules and methods of evaluation.
They might look at one (or some) of the following factors:
If you are in co-op, your co-op sequence could affect the way your grades are calculated when applying to professional schools as some programs expect you to complete two study terms per academic year (typically from September-August) in order to count as a year of study or towards the grades in your GPA.
Graduate school grade calculations are not typically impacted by your co-op sequence.
Depending on where you will be applying, the application and start timelines, document conventions, and program structure may be different. It is important to research the conventions in the location you are applying to.
If you are applying outside of Canada you will need to meet immigration requirements in the country you will be living in. Immigration requirements vary widely; you will need to research them thoroughly as part of your planning. You may also need to show proof that you can pay tuition when you enter the country where you will study.
Depending on your immigration status in the country where you will study, you may be considered an international student. International students often pay higher tuition. Some programs in the United States give special status to Canadian applicants.
Some institutions have rolling admissions, which means applications are accepted at any time or before the advertised deadline. Admissions committees will review a complete file and make offers and funding decisions based on an applicant’s file. Applying early to a program can help you secure a spot before more competitive applications are received.
Some programs have several admission categories (e.g., regular, mature, special consideration, access). The Grade Point Average (GPA) requirement and admission test scores may vary based on competition from individuals in a particular applicant pool. It is not detrimental to apply to a category other than “regular.” Showing that you maintained a good GPA while dealing with special circumstances can work to your advantage.
Ascertain which of the following are required:
Identify what types and levels of previous education are required. For some professional programs, a completed undergraduate degree is not required. When applying to a graduate program, you usually need a degree in the same area, but not in every case.
If you are considering completing a graduate degree to boost your GPA to enter a professional program, be aware that most will not consider your graduate GPA. Most professional programs only consider your undergrad GPA.
Generally, no extra consideration is given if you are currently, or have been, a student at the university to which you are applying.
Some programs require certain prerequisites to assess whether an applicant is ready to successfully complete a program. Often prerequisite courses need to meet a GPA cutoff. Prerequisites can change, so keep up to date on each program’s requirements.
Check with the admission’s office about necessary prerequisites if the information is not clear on their website: you can send a course description (including the URL) and course syllabus for the course(s) you determine meets the prerequisite requirements. The more information provided to an admissions office, hopefully, the faster the response time. Try to obtain written confirmation from the admissions office, as a paper trail will provide proof that the courses you have completed meet the school’s requirements. There are many programs that will not evaluate prerequisites until you have completed and paid for the application. Some institutions provide a list of courses accepted from other universities.
Some programs allow you to complete prerequisites as late as the term prior to the program start date, while others do not. Always verify the latest date of graduation (or prerequisite completion) accepted.
Please note that staff in the Centre for Career Development cannot advise you about whether courses meet a program’s prerequisites.
Admission requirements usually state the minimum GPA required to be admitted to a program. If this is not clear, contact the school to find out the GPA requirement and how it is computed. Different possibilities might include: a cumulative average, your grades for the last two years, your grades in your major, the last year of study, or marks in courses related to the program, and so on. The minimum requirement varies by program and a competitive GPA is typically higher than the minimum. The minimum GPA for a Master’s program is usually 75%. If you have a lower GPA in your last or last one or two years of study, this will be a red flag for admissions officers, as it can be interpreted to indicate either that you will not be successful in a graduate program, or that you have not grasped the core concepts required for a graduate/professional program.
The required GPA for professional programs tends to be in the low 80’s. If applying while completing a 4-year degree, most programs only consider 4A term marks and earlier, or in some cases 3B marks and earlier.
Institutions use either a 10-point or a 4-point scale, so it is important to ask how your average will be converted. Visit the program website to see if GPAs are posted for previous years. If you are applying to faculties of law, medicine, or rehab sciences in Ontario, the Ontario Universities’ Application Centre (OUAC) has GPA conversion charts published for each type of program.
For an international or exchange term, the program may need a World Education Service (WES) conversion of your grades. Allow enough time for grade conversion through WES or to order and send transcripts by the deadline date.
When applying to any graduate or professional program, check if an admission test is required and what the deadline is for score submission. If an admission test score is required, be aware that stellar results can often balance out a mediocre GPA, and that, conversely, the opposite is also true.
Some programs accept test scores after the application deadline. In most cases, test results are available four to six weeks after the test date. If you are applying to a program with rolling admissions, a complete application package (including test scores) is required before your application can be evaluated.
Prepare thoroughly for the test you need to write; plan to write it just once. At the same time, though, it is advisable that you write an admission test early enough that you could rewrite it if necessary. Determine how recent your score must be for any given application, plus how multiple scores are handled (e.g., do they consider the highest score, or do they take an average of all scores achieved?). Do not write an admission test the first time without preparing just to “try it out,” as admission committees sometimes have access to score cancellations. Note that there is a waiting period for retaking admission tests and that they can often only be retaken a limited number of times.
Allow enough time to register for the test, order study materials, study, and, if desired, attend a preparation course. Some University of Waterloo clubs on campus hold practice tests, so check their websites for information. The Centre for Career Development has practice test books that you can borrow. A link to admission test information is available on the Centre for Career Development website. Some admission tests are written at a computer-based testing centre. On the test date, you may be required to provide a list of schools that you are applying to.
Here is a list of admission tests:
The Graduate Records Examination (GRE) may be required for application to graduate schools. There is a GRE general test and a GRE subject test, but not all schools require both test results. The GRE general test is written at a computer-based testing site and has several sections: verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, and analytical writing. Contact the programs to which you are applying to determine if they use the results from every section. Doing so may help you to decide if you need to rewrite the test if your test results were low in certain sections.
The GRE subject test is a paper-based test written at testing sites across Canada. The test can be taken as often as it is offered (i.e., April, October, and November). If your scores are good, it may be to your advantage to submit them to all schools, even to those that do not require them.
The GRE is generally not required by Canadian programs if your undergraduate education was completed in Canada or the United States, but it is almost always required for graduate programs in the United States.
Only you can decide if you want to take an admission-test preparation course. Be sure to do your research to determine the value of such preparation. It is recommended that you check whether: the course fits your learning style; the course is offered online or in-person; the course is available weekends or evenings; the instructor’s experience teaching the course materials is substantial; the course covers topic content, strategies, practice tests, or too much of any one of these; the duration of the course is manageable. A longer course is not necessarily better; some companies include the amount of time spent on practice tests in their total time calculations. It is useful to use previously administered tests as a preparation tool. These are often available through the test registration site. If possible, complete practice tests in the format in which you will have to write: paper or computer-based. Each company has different teaching strategies and it can be confusing to use multiple sources of information. Some companies provide University of Waterloo students discounts; for details, visit the list of preparation courses on the Centre for Career Development’s website.
Some programs have language proficiency requirements. If your native language is English OR you have completed the four full years of your undergraduate degree at an English speaking institution, a test is generally not required. Some programs may waive the admission test scores if you can provide proof of proficiency from other sources such as courses, but if they recommend you take it — do it!
You may need to take the International English Language Testing System (IELTS); the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL); Test of Written English (TWE); or Test of English as a Foreign Language, Test of Spoken English (TOEFL TSE).
Ascertain if any type of experience is necessary to a successful application (i.e., volunteer, extra-curricular, or work). If so, consider which type(s) are required and what would be the most relevant experiences within each type (e.g., work experience is mandatory when applying to most MBA programs). If you are applying to a graduate program, research experience can be a plus. If you are applying to a health-related professional program, in most cases experience from within the profession is necessary. Use experiences from work, volunteering, extra-curricular activities, memberships in clubs/teams, and shadowing to show the depth of your understanding about the profession you want to enter in your application.
Well-rounded students who show leadership qualities, relate well to others, and possess organizational skills have an edge in the application process. In fact, according to Scholarships Canada, involvement in extra-curricular activities can greatly increase your chances of receiving a scholarship. However, admission committees also recognize that over-involvement in such activities can adversely affect your GPA, so be sure to engage only in the number of activities that you can effectively manage.
Professional Associations and Clubs (Applied Health Sciences Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Arts Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Engineering Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Environment Faculty) (PDF)
Even though many students apply to research-based Master’s programs without any research experience, having it can provide a competitive advantage. It is highly recommended that if you apply for a direct entry Ph.D program that you do get prior research experience. Start thinking about what interests you, and try to gain experience in this area. This will help you find a program and potential supervisor. The University of Waterloo library site has an extensive list of research databases to view journal articles and find what fascinates you.
To gain research experiences seek out opportunities such as the NSERC Undergraduate Research Awards (USRA) positions. Applications for an NSERC USRA are very competitive. Some departments offer University Research Assistantships that could provide research experience.
Securing an Undergraduate Research Internship (URI) would allow you to hold a research position with a professor; these opportunities are managed by Co-operative and Experiential Education and the program is open to regular and co-op students. Be proactive and approach a professor, tell them about the program, and provide the URL so they can complete the application.
Another option is to volunteer in a lab on campus where permitted. You could run experiments or even conduct basic literature reviews for professors or grad students. Approach faculty members and explain how your skills and background will be an asset to their research. Consider the faculty member’s perspective and do not focus just on what you will get out of the experience.
Often your fourth year design project or final thesis course and paper will provide research exposure. If you are in a co-op program, you can look for research-based work terms at Waterloo, other institutions, or in industry.
Seek to publish your work whenever possible. It will be especially important if applying to a Ph.D program — giving you a competitive edge. You do not have to be the first author. Take any opportunity to contribute to a study, write up a journal article, or participate in a conference presentation/abstract.
Talk to a faculty member to find out how you could turn your senior-year course project into a publication.
What is CASPer®?
CASPer® (Computer–based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics) is an admissions test that assesses interpersonal and non–cognitive skills like communication, collaboration, interpersonal, ethical–decision making, empathy, compassion, integrity, etc. through a scenario–based format. The scenarios are largely ethical in nature and the questions asked gauge your personal attributes and characteristics using concrete examples of real–world situations.
CASPer® is not a knowledge–based test.
Who uses CASPer®?
CASPer® is increasingly being used by many professional programs, and is common health–related programs such as medicine, nursing, optometry, pharmacy, and more. Programs can add CASPer® to their list of requirements for any application cycle, so check the information for the year of your application cycle.
How do I find out if I need CASPer®?
There are two ways to find out if you need to take CASPer® for your application(s):
What is the CASPer® testing process like?
CASPer® is a computer–based online test, meaning you can take this test in any environment with a reliable internet connection and minimal distractions. The test is 90 minutes in length and is comprised of 10–12 sections. Each section will present a video or written scenario. You can only watch the video or read the written passage once per scenario. Following each scenario, applicants are required to type out an answer three questions in five minutes. Each response is graded by a different marker, so 10–12 people mark your CASPer® test.
Very few schools are explicit about the possible ways that CASPer® scores are used in their admission decisions.
How many times do I need to take the test?
You will need to take the test at least once for every year you apply, as your test scores are only valid for one year.
Generally, the content of the CASPer® test is unique to each program type and country, so you may need to take the test more than once in a cycle if you are applying to multiple program types. However, if you are applying to the professions of dentistry, medicine and optometry in Canada you will write the test once during an admissions cycle. If you are applying to both Canadian and US medical schools, you need to write the US and Canadian CASPer® test.
How can I prepare for CASPer®?
There are many different ways you could prepare yourself for the CASPer® test. There isn’t one right way to prepare for this or any other admissions test. But in general, exposing yourself to the testing format, familiarizing yourself with relevant content, and finding an approach that works for you so you can structure your thoughts and move through the content quickly are key to doing your best.
Check the Test Prep page of CASPer®’s website for their tips to prepare for your test day.
You can test out some common strategies and see which ones help you to best organize your thoughts and make sure that you’re addressing all the questions.
If you are looking for more specific tips and tricks to help you prepare and be successful writing CASPer®, think about some combination of these options:
If you’re not sure where to start, drop by the Centre for Career Development library in the Tatham Centre.
How should I format my responses?
There isn’t one right format for a CASPer® response, but finding a format or strategy that works well for you can help you respond effectively and avoid getting bogged down in organizational details that have little bearing on how your response is scored. Test out different options and see which works best for you and the way your brain likes to organize information. Here’s one example:
Here’s one recommended format on how to approach CASPer®:
Due to the limited time to answer each question it may be helpful to use this format:
Are there test prep courses for CASPer®?
There are companies that offer CASPer® prep courses; however, UWaterloo students that provided feedback after writing CASPer® do not think they are necessary, nor do Admission Directors. At minimum, it will be helpful to understand the CASPer® format and strategies on how to write it.
Should you decide that practice and preparation are useful for you, check out the preparation program supported by CASPer® here.
What kinds of questions will they ask?
Generally, they’re asking reflective questions about your approach or action–oriented response to a specific scenario. The scenarios are ethical in nature, meaning there is no one right answer and typically multiple perspectives to be considered. The scenarios and following questions may or may not be health–related, but they certainly will relate to your ability to analyze a complex situation and communicate with others. Here are some examples to start:
Example 1
Video shows two people arguing about a convicted pedophile, John, who will be released soon from jail and will be living in their neighbourhood. Do you agree with this decision to release John?
Questions:
Example 2
Personal Descriptor CASPer® example: Consider the experiences you have and insight gained from these experiences that led you to believe that you would be a good physician.
Questions:
Example 3
Video of Head of Athletic Department talking to a mother who was complaining about her child not being selected for a team. Mother’s question at the end of the scenario was “Are you going to continue to allow this?”
Questions:
Example 4
Personal Descriptor CASPer® example: Talk about a stressful situation you have encountered.
Follow–up questions:
Can I get access to sample questions from previous tests?
Yes, it is possible to access question banks with CASPer® scenarios and questions to aid in your preparation beyond what’s available on the CASPer® website itself. The strength of third–party resources and their proximity to actual CASPer® scenarios depends highly on the specific resource and the extent to which the banks get updated each application cycle.
Unlike the MCAT, it’s not necessary to make use of extensive question banks to be successful, and these resources can be costly. If this option doesn’t work for you, that’s okay! Think about using some of the other strategies mentioned here. If you still have questions about the best method for you, you can connect with a Further Education Advisor in a drop–in to start a conversation.
Check if references are required and, if so, the number and type (academic or non-academic). Many programs require two academic references (meaning professors — although exceptions can be made for those who have been out of school for some time), while some ask for one academic and one non-academic. Examples of non-academic references are coaches, volunteer supervisors, and employers. If there are no guidelines on which type of reference is required, academic reference letters are usually highly valued, as your referee should be able to speak to your ability to be successful in a professional/graduate school.
Evaluate who can best provide a non-academic reference letter. Asking someone with a prestigious title, but who cannot provide any substance on your capabilities (with proof) will add no value to your application. Consider first what you want discussed in your reference letter and then find people who can provide that information.
Ask your potential referees in person: “Will you have time to write a strong supporting reference letter?” Then listen to how the individual responds. If you detect any hesitation, try to find someone else. Individuals could be reluctant to write a letter of reference if they have little to say that is positive about your work, or alternatively if they have little memory of you. Many referees will try to let you down easily in such cases. Providing them a way to say “no” can help ensure that you obtain only the most positive of references for your application, whereas including references from individuals who indicate that they do not know you well can be very detrimental to your application.
If your referee is unsure of what to include in the reference letter, suggest that they: include their credentials/accomplishments; provide proof about your abilities/attributes; and share what you accomplished in the course/work term (e.g., assignments, presentations, grades received), difficulty of course/work experience, and comparison of you to other successful students.
It is recommended that you cultivate relationships throughout your university experience, so that when the time comes to ask potential referees to write a letter, you have some choices. Many students worry about how to go about doing this, as they may not feel close enough to their professors to be memorable. But there are ways to tackle this challenge. Pick a professor from whom you have taken several classes, or one to whom you have submitted a particularly strong essay or project. Visit the professor during his or her office hours, or ask questions after class. Show that you are interested in the class content, and that you have a goal to attend graduate school or a professional program. You can mention through this process that in the future you hope that they might write a reference letter for you. This may help them to pay more attention to you. Start establishing these connections today.
Give referees enough time to write effective letters. Ask 4 to 6 weeks in advance for a reference letter, and provide the form, addressed envelope with postage (if necessary), your personal statement/letter of intent, a list of projects completed in their courses, admission requirements, and your résumé — anything that will help their task of writing a letter. Provide a general idea of why you want to attend that particular professional/graduate program, as well as what areas of the field interest you. Ask if your referee requires more information to write your letter.
Sometimes you will be given the option of an “open” versus a “closed” reference letter. An open letter means that you can read it prior to submission; however, it is best not to choose this option as such letters are not viewed as favourably as “closed,” and thus confidential, letters.
If you are not using a centralized application centre, referees will need to provide you with a reference letter for each program or school to which you are applying. These programs will require referees to submit references either directly to the program (electronically after you have provided their name/contact information, or by mail) or in a sealed envelope with a signature across the closing to the applicant. The application process might indicate when your references have been received, so you can use this information to follow-up and remind your referees if necessary. If you apply through a centralized application service, each referee completes only one reference form or letter, which is submitted directly to the application centre for distribution to each institution.
Admission committees look for specific examples of academic abilities as well as discipline, persistence, and responsibility. If a reference form is required, read through the different categories a referee needs to complete because this information may help you identify whom to ask to complete the form and reference letter. Always remember to send a thank-you note to your referee(s).
Transcripts need to be ordered directly from the school(s) you attended unless you are currently enrolled in, or have graduated from, an Ontario university or college and are applying through OUAC. In the latter case, submit a transcript request form to OUAC, and your transcripts will be ordered and forwarded to the institutions to which you are applying. If you are applying to a program at a school that you have already attended, you may not be required to submit a transcript.
It is always a good idea to check your unofficial transcript to ensure it is accurate. Allow enough time to order and have transcripts sent to the school to which you are applying. (At the University of Waterloo this is from the Registrar‘s Office for undergraduate transcripts and the Graduate Studies Office for graduate transcripts.) You may be asked to submit the transcript with your application package in a sealed, signed envelope. Check the admission requirements to determine if a final transcript needs to be sent after you complete your degree.
Graduate degree programs may begin in January, May, or September, and applications are generally due between December and February (for a September start date). In Ontario, applications to certain programs are made through OUAC. The online application becomes available approximately three months prior to the deadline. It usually takes between 5 to 25 to complete an application, so allow yourself enough time to do a thorough job. You do not need to complete the application in one sitting; you can enter and exit the application until you decide you are ready to submit. The following are applications available through OUAC:
If applying to professional programs outside Ontario, contact each institution to check the number of applicants accepted from out of province. Apply directly to each institution. In many cases, an online application form is used.
If your application process involves an interview, please review the Interviewing pages within this Further education section to learn more about graduate/professional school interviews.
If you receive an offer from your second-choice school, contact your first-choice school to see if you can accelerate its decision. If you receive a letter stating you are on a waiting list, determine if you can take steps to increase the likelihood of being accepted. It may be possible to provide additional reference letters and other information to show how your skills and experience have grown since your original application. If possible, visit schools and try to meet with decision makers. And, if you know a faculty member with connections to your program or institution of choice, ask him or her to speak to the admissions committee on your behalf.
Although many students strengthen their qualifications and reapply, it is important to be realistic (i.e., know when and how to develop a viable alternative that will still allow you to realize many of your goals).
If you are unsure of your interests or goals, or don‘t have a parallel plan, please review the Decision-making section of CareerHub.
In order to become licensed as a Registered Nurse (RN), an individual must obtain an acceptable degree, either a Bachelor in Nursing (BN), or a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BScN).
Degrees can be obtained through universities and colleges, and are usually four years in length.
Registered Practical Nursing (RPN) programs generally require a two–year college diploma and completion of the Canadian Practical Nurse Registration Examination. In the workplace, RPNs assist Doctors and RNs with patients requiring less complex care.
A Nurse Practitioner (NP) is an RN with a more advanced university education who has passed a further examination process. There are nine universities in Ontario which offer the advanced education under the Council of Ontario University Programs in Nursing (COUPN). An NP can diagnose and treat common acute illnesses, perform physical check–ups, manage stable chronic illnesses, prescribe certain medications, order and interpret specific lab tests and X–rays, and make referrals. Specialties can include Primary Health Care, Adult, or Pediatrics. There are separate exams for each specialty.
For students who have earned a degree, there are compressed/advanced standing/accelerated fast–track programs that can allow students to earn a nursing degree in approximately 19–24 months.
Programs contain both theoretical classroom instruction, and practical training in a clinical/medical environment. After earning the degree, students must pass the exam administered by the appropriate provincial nursing association to become a Registered Nurse.
More information can be found on the College of Nurses of Ontario website.
Most of the RN fast–track nursing programs in Ontario require that candidates have completed university courses (usually a minimum of two years) with some courses in the following disciplines:
The minimum academic requirements to get into a fast–track program typically include at least 75%–78% in the final year or two of the degree. Some schools have higher competitive averages. Application deadlines vary by school, ranging from October through March. Exact dates can be found on each individual school’s website.
To find all approved nursing programs in Ontario, review the College of Nurses of Ontario website. Apply to the schools that have programs that fit the extent of your education and your preference of curriculum.
The following Ontario universities offer fast–track programs:
Volunteering will provide you with new skills and experience that may enhance your application. Admission committees are looking for well–rounded students, in particular, those who combine academic excellence with extra–curricular activities, including community and public service. Although volunteer experience is not mandatory, most nursing school admission committees that review supplementary applications look upon community involvement positively: they are looking for skills you have developed that will allow you to be successful in the program and in the profession. Also consider job shadowing so that you have a clear understanding of the profession.
The College of Nurses of Ontario regularly posts volunteer opportunities. Other places to look for volunteer opportunities in nursing would be local hospitals and clinics, or the nearest Red Cross.
In hospitals there are opportunities to volunteer to provide support to families and patients. For example, at the Grand River Hospital in Kitchener, there are positions for volunteers to be part of the day hospital team.
Many opportunities have transferable skills that can help you plan for nursing.
In Ontario, the first step to apply to the fast–track programs is through the Ontario University Application Centre (OUAC) form 105. The next step is to complete any additional application requirements by following instructions from each specific school.
When applying to nursing programs you may be required to provide the following:
You have several options when pursuing your formal education goals: graduate programs in academic subjects (e.g., Master’s or Ph.D programs); professional programs (e.g., law school, medical school, dental school); post-diploma and professional programs at colleges that generally require a Bachelor’s degree to qualify for application and can sometimes exist as a joint program with a university; or other educational opportunities (e.g., courses offered through the Human Resources Professionals Association of Ontario or the Canadian Securities Institute).
Now that you have decided to enrol in a graduate or professional program, the first step is to choose the program that will best meet your needs. Talk to professors, admissions staff, graduate students, and alumni to help you determine which program to enter. Ask about each school’s reputation in the field. Contact the department or faculty of the school you want to attend to get further information; administrators may start a file based on this initial contact. Finally, a campus visit can go a long way towards helping you make an informed decision.
It may be helpful to find a professor who shares your interests and who will act as a mentor. This professor may be willing to help you identify the programs that are best suited to your interests and assist you in the selection and application processes. Also consider contacting the graduate student associations at your universities of interest as well as relevant professional associations: they may provide you with first-hand, up-to-date insights into programs.
As a Health Studies co-op student, Rachel McDonald spent five co-op work terms at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. She coordinated the rapid response radiotherapy program, which provides palliative radiation treatment to advanced cancer patients. Over five co-op terms, Rachel collected, analyzed and published data as the lead author on seven papers in peer-reviewed journals. She was even flown to Miami and Copenhagen to present research on quality of life and bone metastases.
Rachel was accepted into two of Canada’s most prestigious medical schools: Queens University and University of Toronto. Now, she is in her second year of medical school at the University of Toronto.
I think a lot of people underestimate the power of co-op. Work hard, be diligent and take initiative to do things outside of just what the position entails.
Rachel McDonald, co-op stream
Honours Science student Colin Whaley appreciated the consistency of the regular stream of study, which allowed him to tailor his classes and extracurriculars during his fall/winter study terms. In just five years, Colin was able to complete three honours thesis courses (biology, health and kinesiology), work as a Teaching Assistant and publish two papers. He also volunteered with campus clubs and services like the Campus Response Team and MATES Peer Counselling Group and even co-founded his own club that has sent around 100 volunteers to deliver technology training to seniors in long-term care homes and hospitals.
After working as a researcher at the Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre and completing the graduate program at the University of Waterloo’s School of Pharmacy, Colin was accepted to a number of Canadian medical schools. He will now be attending Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster University.
Get involved, build relationships and maintain an open mind towards different fields of research and practice. This can take you down some really interesting paths.
Colin Whaley, regular stream
It is important that you understand how your grades will be calculated, as each graduate and professional school has different rules and methods of evaluation.
They might look at one (or some) of the following factors:
If you are in co-op, your co-op sequence could affect the way your grades are calculated when applying to professional schools as some programs expect you to complete two study terms per academic year (typically from September-August) in order to count as a year of study or towards the grades in your GPA.
Graduate school grade calculations are not typically impacted by your co-op sequence.
Depending on where you will be applying, the application and start timelines, document conventions, and program structure may be different. It is important to research the conventions in the location you are applying to.
If you are applying outside of Canada you will need to meet immigration requirements in the country you will be living in. Immigration requirements vary widely; you will need to research them thoroughly as part of your planning. You may also need to show proof that you can pay tuition when you enter the country where you will study.
Depending on your immigration status in the country where you will study, you may be considered an international student. International students often pay higher tuition. Some programs in the United States give special status to Canadian applicants.
Some institutions have rolling admissions, which means applications are accepted at any time or before the advertised deadline. Admissions committees will review a complete file and make offers and funding decisions based on an applicant’s file. Applying early to a program can help you secure a spot before more competitive applications are received.
Some programs have several admission categories (e.g., regular, mature, special consideration, access). The Grade Point Average (GPA) requirement and admission test scores may vary based on competition from individuals in a particular applicant pool. It is not detrimental to apply to a category other than “regular.” Showing that you maintained a good GPA while dealing with special circumstances can work to your advantage.
Ascertain which of the following are required:
Identify what types and levels of previous education are required. For some professional programs, a completed undergraduate degree is not required. When applying to a graduate program, you usually need a degree in the same area, but not in every case.
If you are considering completing a graduate degree to boost your GPA to enter a professional program, be aware that most will not consider your graduate GPA. Most professional programs only consider your undergrad GPA.
Generally, no extra consideration is given if you are currently, or have been, a student at the university to which you are applying.
Some programs require certain prerequisites to assess whether an applicant is ready to successfully complete a program. Often prerequisite courses need to meet a GPA cutoff. Prerequisites can change, so keep up to date on each program’s requirements.
Check with the admission’s office about necessary prerequisites if the information is not clear on their website: you can send a course description (including the URL) and course syllabus for the course(s) you determine meets the prerequisite requirements. The more information provided to an admissions office, hopefully, the faster the response time. Try to obtain written confirmation from the admissions office, as a paper trail will provide proof that the courses you have completed meet the school’s requirements. There are many programs that will not evaluate prerequisites until you have completed and paid for the application. Some institutions provide a list of courses accepted from other universities.
Some programs allow you to complete prerequisites as late as the term prior to the program start date, while others do not. Always verify the latest date of graduation (or prerequisite completion) accepted.
Please note that staff in the Centre for Career Development cannot advise you about whether courses meet a program’s prerequisites.
Admission requirements usually state the minimum GPA required to be admitted to a program. If this is not clear, contact the school to find out the GPA requirement and how it is computed. Different possibilities might include: a cumulative average, your grades for the last two years, your grades in your major, the last year of study, or marks in courses related to the program, and so on. The minimum requirement varies by program and a competitive GPA is typically higher than the minimum. The minimum GPA for a Master’s program is usually 75%. If you have a lower GPA in your last or last one or two years of study, this will be a red flag for admissions officers, as it can be interpreted to indicate either that you will not be successful in a graduate program, or that you have not grasped the core concepts required for a graduate/professional program.
The required GPA for professional programs tends to be in the low 80’s. If applying while completing a 4-year degree, most programs only consider 4A term marks and earlier, or in some cases 3B marks and earlier.
Institutions use either a 10-point or a 4-point scale, so it is important to ask how your average will be converted. Visit the program website to see if GPAs are posted for previous years. If you are applying to faculties of law, medicine, or rehab sciences in Ontario, the Ontario Universities’ Application Centre (OUAC) has GPA conversion charts published for each type of program.
For an international or exchange term, the program may need a World Education Service (WES) conversion of your grades. Allow enough time for grade conversion through WES or to order and send transcripts by the deadline date.
When applying to any graduate or professional program, check if an admission test is required and what the deadline is for score submission. If an admission test score is required, be aware that stellar results can often balance out a mediocre GPA, and that, conversely, the opposite is also true.
Some programs accept test scores after the application deadline. In most cases, test results are available four to six weeks after the test date. If you are applying to a program with rolling admissions, a complete application package (including test scores) is required before your application can be evaluated.
Prepare thoroughly for the test you need to write; plan to write it just once. At the same time, though, it is advisable that you write an admission test early enough that you could rewrite it if necessary. Determine how recent your score must be for any given application, plus how multiple scores are handled (e.g., do they consider the highest score, or do they take an average of all scores achieved?). Do not write an admission test the first time without preparing just to “try it out,” as admission committees sometimes have access to score cancellations. Note that there is a waiting period for retaking admission tests and that they can often only be retaken a limited number of times.
Allow enough time to register for the test, order study materials, study, and, if desired, attend a preparation course. Some University of Waterloo clubs on campus hold practice tests, so check their websites for information. The Centre for Career Development has practice test books that you can borrow. A link to admission test information is available on the Centre for Career Development website. Some admission tests are written at a computer-based testing centre. On the test date, you may be required to provide a list of schools that you are applying to.
Here is a list of admission tests:
The Graduate Records Examination (GRE) may be required for application to graduate schools. There is a GRE general test and a GRE subject test, but not all schools require both test results. The GRE general test is written at a computer-based testing site and has several sections: verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, and analytical writing. Contact the programs to which you are applying to determine if they use the results from every section. Doing so may help you to decide if you need to rewrite the test if your test results were low in certain sections.
The GRE subject test is a paper-based test written at testing sites across Canada. The test can be taken as often as it is offered (i.e., April, October, and November). If your scores are good, it may be to your advantage to submit them to all schools, even to those that do not require them.
The GRE is generally not required by Canadian programs if your undergraduate education was completed in Canada or the United States, but it is almost always required for graduate programs in the United States.
Only you can decide if you want to take an admission-test preparation course. Be sure to do your research to determine the value of such preparation. It is recommended that you check whether: the course fits your learning style; the course is offered online or in-person; the course is available weekends or evenings; the instructor’s experience teaching the course materials is substantial; the course covers topic content, strategies, practice tests, or too much of any one of these; the duration of the course is manageable. A longer course is not necessarily better; some companies include the amount of time spent on practice tests in their total time calculations. It is useful to use previously administered tests as a preparation tool. These are often available through the test registration site. If possible, complete practice tests in the format in which you will have to write: paper or computer-based. Each company has different teaching strategies and it can be confusing to use multiple sources of information. Some companies provide University of Waterloo students discounts; for details, visit the list of preparation courses on the Centre for Career Development’s website.
Some programs have language proficiency requirements. If your native language is English OR you have completed the four full years of your undergraduate degree at an English speaking institution, a test is generally not required. Some programs may waive the admission test scores if you can provide proof of proficiency from other sources such as courses, but if they recommend you take it — do it!
You may need to take the International English Language Testing System (IELTS); the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL); Test of Written English (TWE); or Test of English as a Foreign Language, Test of Spoken English (TOEFL TSE).
Ascertain if any type of experience is necessary to a successful application (i.e., volunteer, extra-curricular, or work). If so, consider which type(s) are required and what would be the most relevant experiences within each type (e.g., work experience is mandatory when applying to most MBA programs). If you are applying to a graduate program, research experience can be a plus. If you are applying to a health-related professional program, in most cases experience from within the profession is necessary. Use experiences from work, volunteering, extra-curricular activities, memberships in clubs/teams, and shadowing to show the depth of your understanding about the profession you want to enter in your application.
Well-rounded students who show leadership qualities, relate well to others, and possess organizational skills have an edge in the application process. In fact, according to Scholarships Canada, involvement in extra-curricular activities can greatly increase your chances of receiving a scholarship. However, admission committees also recognize that over-involvement in such activities can adversely affect your GPA, so be sure to engage only in the number of activities that you can effectively manage.
Professional Associations and Clubs (Applied Health Sciences Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Arts Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Engineering Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Environment Faculty) (PDF)
Even though many students apply to research-based Master’s programs without any research experience, having it can provide a competitive advantage. It is highly recommended that if you apply for a direct entry Ph.D program that you do get prior research experience. Start thinking about what interests you, and try to gain experience in this area. This will help you find a program and potential supervisor. The University of Waterloo library site has an extensive list of research databases to view journal articles and find what fascinates you.
To gain research experiences seek out opportunities such as the NSERC Undergraduate Research Awards (USRA) positions. Applications for an NSERC USRA are very competitive. Some departments offer University Research Assistantships that could provide research experience.
Securing an Undergraduate Research Internship (URI) would allow you to hold a research position with a professor; these opportunities are managed by Co-operative and Experiential Education and the program is open to regular and co-op students. Be proactive and approach a professor, tell them about the program, and provide the URL so they can complete the application.
Another option is to volunteer in a lab on campus where permitted. You could run experiments or even conduct basic literature reviews for professors or grad students. Approach faculty members and explain how your skills and background will be an asset to their research. Consider the faculty member’s perspective and do not focus just on what you will get out of the experience.
Often your fourth year design project or final thesis course and paper will provide research exposure. If you are in a co-op program, you can look for research-based work terms at Waterloo, other institutions, or in industry.
Seek to publish your work whenever possible. It will be especially important if applying to a Ph.D program — giving you a competitive edge. You do not have to be the first author. Take any opportunity to contribute to a study, write up a journal article, or participate in a conference presentation/abstract.
Talk to a faculty member to find out how you could turn your senior-year course project into a publication.
What is CASPer®?
CASPer® (Computer–based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics) is an admissions test that assesses interpersonal and non–cognitive skills like communication, collaboration, interpersonal, ethical–decision making, empathy, compassion, integrity, etc. through a scenario–based format. The scenarios are largely ethical in nature and the questions asked gauge your personal attributes and characteristics using concrete examples of real–world situations.
CASPer® is not a knowledge–based test.
Who uses CASPer®?
CASPer® is increasingly being used by many professional programs, and is common health–related programs such as medicine, nursing, optometry, pharmacy, and more. Programs can add CASPer® to their list of requirements for any application cycle, so check the information for the year of your application cycle.
How do I find out if I need CASPer®?
There are two ways to find out if you need to take CASPer® for your application(s):
What is the CASPer® testing process like?
CASPer® is a computer–based online test, meaning you can take this test in any environment with a reliable internet connection and minimal distractions. The test is 90 minutes in length and is comprised of 10–12 sections. Each section will present a video or written scenario. You can only watch the video or read the written passage once per scenario. Following each scenario, applicants are required to type out an answer three questions in five minutes. Each response is graded by a different marker, so 10–12 people mark your CASPer® test.
Very few schools are explicit about the possible ways that CASPer® scores are used in their admission decisions.
How many times do I need to take the test?
You will need to take the test at least once for every year you apply, as your test scores are only valid for one year.
Generally, the content of the CASPer® test is unique to each program type and country, so you may need to take the test more than once in a cycle if you are applying to multiple program types. However, if you are applying to the professions of dentistry, medicine and optometry in Canada you will write the test once during an admissions cycle. If you are applying to both Canadian and US medical schools, you need to write the US and Canadian CASPer® test.
How can I prepare for CASPer®?
There are many different ways you could prepare yourself for the CASPer® test. There isn’t one right way to prepare for this or any other admissions test. But in general, exposing yourself to the testing format, familiarizing yourself with relevant content, and finding an approach that works for you so you can structure your thoughts and move through the content quickly are key to doing your best.
Check the Test Prep page of CASPer®’s website for their tips to prepare for your test day.
You can test out some common strategies and see which ones help you to best organize your thoughts and make sure that you’re addressing all the questions.
If you are looking for more specific tips and tricks to help you prepare and be successful writing CASPer®, think about some combination of these options:
If you’re not sure where to start, drop by the Centre for Career Development library in the Tatham Centre.
How should I format my responses?
There isn’t one right format for a CASPer® response, but finding a format or strategy that works well for you can help you respond effectively and avoid getting bogged down in organizational details that have little bearing on how your response is scored. Test out different options and see which works best for you and the way your brain likes to organize information. Here’s one example:
Here’s one recommended format on how to approach CASPer®:
Due to the limited time to answer each question it may be helpful to use this format:
Are there test prep courses for CASPer®?
There are companies that offer CASPer® prep courses; however, UWaterloo students that provided feedback after writing CASPer® do not think they are necessary, nor do Admission Directors. At minimum, it will be helpful to understand the CASPer® format and strategies on how to write it.
Should you decide that practice and preparation are useful for you, check out the preparation program supported by CASPer® here.
What kinds of questions will they ask?
Generally, they’re asking reflective questions about your approach or action–oriented response to a specific scenario. The scenarios are ethical in nature, meaning there is no one right answer and typically multiple perspectives to be considered. The scenarios and following questions may or may not be health–related, but they certainly will relate to your ability to analyze a complex situation and communicate with others. Here are some examples to start:
Example 1
Video shows two people arguing about a convicted pedophile, John, who will be released soon from jail and will be living in their neighbourhood. Do you agree with this decision to release John?
Questions:
Example 2
Personal Descriptor CASPer® example: Consider the experiences you have and insight gained from these experiences that led you to believe that you would be a good physician.
Questions:
Example 3
Video of Head of Athletic Department talking to a mother who was complaining about her child not being selected for a team. Mother’s question at the end of the scenario was “Are you going to continue to allow this?”
Questions:
Example 4
Personal Descriptor CASPer® example: Talk about a stressful situation you have encountered.
Follow–up questions:
Can I get access to sample questions from previous tests?
Yes, it is possible to access question banks with CASPer® scenarios and questions to aid in your preparation beyond what’s available on the CASPer® website itself. The strength of third–party resources and their proximity to actual CASPer® scenarios depends highly on the specific resource and the extent to which the banks get updated each application cycle.
Unlike the MCAT, it’s not necessary to make use of extensive question banks to be successful, and these resources can be costly. If this option doesn’t work for you, that’s okay! Think about using some of the other strategies mentioned here. If you still have questions about the best method for you, you can connect with a Further Education Advisor in a drop–in to start a conversation.
Check if references are required and, if so, the number and type (academic or non-academic). Many programs require two academic references (meaning professors — although exceptions can be made for those who have been out of school for some time), while some ask for one academic and one non-academic. Examples of non-academic references are coaches, volunteer supervisors, and employers. If there are no guidelines on which type of reference is required, academic reference letters are usually highly valued, as your referee should be able to speak to your ability to be successful in a professional/graduate school.
Evaluate who can best provide a non-academic reference letter. Asking someone with a prestigious title, but who cannot provide any substance on your capabilities (with proof) will add no value to your application. Consider first what you want discussed in your reference letter and then find people who can provide that information.
Ask your potential referees in person: “Will you have time to write a strong supporting reference letter?” Then listen to how the individual responds. If you detect any hesitation, try to find someone else. Individuals could be reluctant to write a letter of reference if they have little to say that is positive about your work, or alternatively if they have little memory of you. Many referees will try to let you down easily in such cases. Providing them a way to say “no” can help ensure that you obtain only the most positive of references for your application, whereas including references from individuals who indicate that they do not know you well can be very detrimental to your application.
If your referee is unsure of what to include in the reference letter, suggest that they: include their credentials/accomplishments; provide proof about your abilities/attributes; and share what you accomplished in the course/work term (e.g., assignments, presentations, grades received), difficulty of course/work experience, and comparison of you to other successful students.
It is recommended that you cultivate relationships throughout your university experience, so that when the time comes to ask potential referees to write a letter, you have some choices. Many students worry about how to go about doing this, as they may not feel close enough to their professors to be memorable. But there are ways to tackle this challenge. Pick a professor from whom you have taken several classes, or one to whom you have submitted a particularly strong essay or project. Visit the professor during his or her office hours, or ask questions after class. Show that you are interested in the class content, and that you have a goal to attend graduate school or a professional program. You can mention through this process that in the future you hope that they might write a reference letter for you. This may help them to pay more attention to you. Start establishing these connections today.
Give referees enough time to write effective letters. Ask 4 to 6 weeks in advance for a reference letter, and provide the form, addressed envelope with postage (if necessary), your personal statement/letter of intent, a list of projects completed in their courses, admission requirements, and your résumé — anything that will help their task of writing a letter. Provide a general idea of why you want to attend that particular professional/graduate program, as well as what areas of the field interest you. Ask if your referee requires more information to write your letter.
Sometimes you will be given the option of an “open” versus a “closed” reference letter. An open letter means that you can read it prior to submission; however, it is best not to choose this option as such letters are not viewed as favourably as “closed,” and thus confidential, letters.
If you are not using a centralized application centre, referees will need to provide you with a reference letter for each program or school to which you are applying. These programs will require referees to submit references either directly to the program (electronically after you have provided their name/contact information, or by mail) or in a sealed envelope with a signature across the closing to the applicant. The application process might indicate when your references have been received, so you can use this information to follow-up and remind your referees if necessary. If you apply through a centralized application service, each referee completes only one reference form or letter, which is submitted directly to the application centre for distribution to each institution.
Admission committees look for specific examples of academic abilities as well as discipline, persistence, and responsibility. If a reference form is required, read through the different categories a referee needs to complete because this information may help you identify whom to ask to complete the form and reference letter. Always remember to send a thank-you note to your referee(s).
Transcripts need to be ordered directly from the school(s) you attended unless you are currently enrolled in, or have graduated from, an Ontario university or college and are applying through OUAC. In the latter case, submit a transcript request form to OUAC, and your transcripts will be ordered and forwarded to the institutions to which you are applying. If you are applying to a program at a school that you have already attended, you may not be required to submit a transcript.
It is always a good idea to check your unofficial transcript to ensure it is accurate. Allow enough time to order and have transcripts sent to the school to which you are applying. (At the University of Waterloo this is from the Registrar‘s Office for undergraduate transcripts and the Graduate Studies Office for graduate transcripts.) You may be asked to submit the transcript with your application package in a sealed, signed envelope. Check the admission requirements to determine if a final transcript needs to be sent after you complete your degree.
Graduate degree programs may begin in January, May, or September, and applications are generally due between December and February (for a September start date). In Ontario, applications to certain programs are made through OUAC. The online application becomes available approximately three months prior to the deadline. It usually takes between 5 to 25 to complete an application, so allow yourself enough time to do a thorough job. You do not need to complete the application in one sitting; you can enter and exit the application until you decide you are ready to submit. The following are applications available through OUAC:
If applying to professional programs outside Ontario, contact each institution to check the number of applicants accepted from out of province. Apply directly to each institution. In many cases, an online application form is used.
If your application process involves an interview, please review the Interviewing pages within this Further education section to learn more about graduate/professional school interviews.
If you receive an offer from your second-choice school, contact your first-choice school to see if you can accelerate its decision. If you receive a letter stating you are on a waiting list, determine if you can take steps to increase the likelihood of being accepted. It may be possible to provide additional reference letters and other information to show how your skills and experience have grown since your original application. If possible, visit schools and try to meet with decision makers. And, if you know a faculty member with connections to your program or institution of choice, ask him or her to speak to the admissions committee on your behalf.
Although many students strengthen their qualifications and reapply, it is important to be realistic (i.e., know when and how to develop a viable alternative that will still allow you to realize many of your goals).
If you are unsure of your interests or goals, or don‘t have a parallel plan, please review the Decision-making section of CareerHub.
A Physician Assistant (PA) works alongside a physician and most of what they do is determined by the scope of their knowledge and their relationship with the physician. Generally the work includes: taking a patient’s medical history, conducting patient examinations, completing clinical assessments and formulating treatment plans, ordering and completing preliminary interpretations of diagnostic tests, performing certain diagnostic procedures, and collecting blood samples.
PA programs are generally two years in length and require that a student has completed two years (10 credits) of an undergraduate university education. Requirements vary from program to program, but students are usually required to obtain a 3.0 (70–76%) average on the OMSAS scale. In most cases the program is offered on a full–time basis.
Once a student has completed the program they must take a licensing exam to become certified to practice in Ontario.
Candidates may be required to have substantial relevant experience to be accepted into a program.
PA programs are looking for volunteer work that involves direct contact with patients. Relevant opportunities may be found in hospitals, long–term care facilities, palliative care facilities, or the Red Cross. There are also opportunities to do this kind of volunteering abroad; visit the Canadian Association of Physician Assistants for additional volunteering ideas.
Please visit the website of each school you are interested in applying to for specific admission requirements and application documents. Practice writing your personal statement in the activity below.
Standard interview format is when candidates are asked a series of questions in front of one or more admission panelists. The main portion of the interview consists of the interviewer asking you questions to try to determine your fit. Generally, you have an opportunity to ask any questions that you may have at the end of the interview.
Practice your interview skills by signing up for the Professional School Interviews (Standard) workshop.
Behaviour-based interviews are designed to elicit information about how you have performed in the past because past behaviour is a good indicator of how you will function in the future. Interviewers develop their questions around the traits and skills they consider necessary for succeeding in a profession. Occasionally, behaviour-based questions are used in the MMI interview format as well. These questions usually begin with phrases such as:
Some applicants find the format of such questions difficult to understand and have trouble responding. However, if you have done your research and have prepared for the interview, you will have work, academic, volunteer, and life experiences ready to share. You can prepare for behaviour-based questions by recalling specific instances that demonstrate your accomplishments, abilities, and fit for the profession/field. Be certain to tell the truth, get to the point, stay focused and positive, and be consistent with your responses. Common behaviour-based interview themes include the following:
Next Step: Work through your résumé to find specific examples for each theme above. Use the STAR approach to describe each example.
The “STAR Approach” is a useful technique for answering behaviour-based questions:
Situation: Provide Background and context:
Task: Describe what you needed to do
Action: Explain what you actually did and how you did it
Result: Describe the outcome of your actions
For example, in response to the query “What experience do you have organizing projects?” you determine that the qualification being evaluated is organizational skills. Your skill/knowledge/ability statement could be, “I have developed excellent organizational skills by working on two major projects. The one I would like to tell you about ended successfully six months ago.”
Every statement you make must be true. Don’t lie or embellish. Ideally, the example you choose should be something that requires a competency similar to the typical work of the prospective professional. If you do not have a similar experience to relate, try to choose the most relevant story from your academic, extracurricular or volunteer activities — do not make it up! Describe the what, who, when, where, why, and how, and talk about the successful outcome or what you learned from the experience.
As you tell the story allow the interviewer to see or live through the action with you. Choose words that will help the interviewer visualize you in the experience (e.g., “It was five minutes before closing on the busiest night of the year when the power went out...”). Whenever possible, include positive feedback from supervisors, colleagues, professors, and others to reinforce your accomplishment. Humour, if used appropriately, can also be an effective tool, because it helps the interviewer to remember you.
The next step is the one that most candidates forget. Tell the interviewer what specific benefits or competitive advantage you can bring to the profession/field because of the experience you have just described. For example, “As part of the team being formed, I would be able to coordinate....” Avoid generic statements such as, “All professions need people with leadership ability.”
An interviewer will use situational/hypothetical questions to establish how you would react to and handle real-life situations. For situational/hypothetical questions, candidates must have a good understanding of the profession and its requirements. Here are some examples of this type of question:
When answering problem-solving questions demonstrate your ability to process information quickly, think logically, and solve creatively. Interviewers place emphasis on the thought process rather than on the conclusion. Examples of problem-solving questions include the following:
The key is not to worry about getting the “right” answer but, rather, to demonstrate your logical thought process in solving the problem. The following five-step process is appropriate for handling most problem-solving questions:
Keep in mind, there is no right answer, only your answer.
In addition to asking the other types of questions mentioned, many interviewers rely on a series of standard questions, and you should prepare for them. Occasionally, classic interview questions are used in the MMI interview format as well.
While preparation is key, it is not possible to predict and prepare for all interview questions. Instead, review your résumé, application, and research the profession (current and future state). Then put information into different categories (e.g., accomplishments, understanding of profession, unique qualities, challenges/weaknesses) enabling you to provide examples as necessary.
The “PAWS” model is a useful method for answering classic questions such as “Tell me about yourself” and “Why do you want to be a ___________?”
When an interviewer asks this question, s/he is looking for those aspects of your life that are relevant to the profession/field, such as how you became interested in the field, related experience, and courses taken. “PAWS” stands for Profile, Academic, Work, and Skills. Include all or as many of the four (in any order) to reinforce your fit for the field/profession.
Here are some examples of what to discuss in each of the four areas:
Profile: Mention how you became interested in this field and point out any relevant community involvement, extracurricular activities, memberships, and personal interests that further demonstrate your commitment to the field
Academic: Talk about your educational background (degrees/diplomas/certifications) and other related training and professional development initiatives/courses that you have participated in
Work: Highlight paid or unpaid (volunteer) experiences related to the profession
Skills: Refer to specific skills/competencies that relate to the profession or field (e.g., communication, interpersonal, time management, problem-solving skills)
Please read Delivering bad news stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews.
Please read Ethical scenario stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews
To supplement the information you obtained before the interview, you should ask questions during the interview (although you will not have this opportunity with MMI interviews). Some questions will arise naturally during the interview, but it is wise to prepare a number of questions in advance. Asking questions will demonstrate your interest and help you determine if the program/school fits your personality, skills, interests, and values.
Your questions should pertain to the program/school and show your enthusiasm and knowledge. By asking intelligent, well-thought-out questions that genuinely matter to you, you will convince the interviewer that you are serious about the program and institution. If a question has been answered during the interview, do not ask it again; such repetition will suggest that you were not listening. It is important to compose your own questions; however, the following may give you a starting point:
Chiropractic, naturopathic medicine, osteopathic medicine, physician assistant, and veterinary medicine programs also have an interview process. Typically, the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College and the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine have standard panel formats. Osteopathic medicine schools in the United States, the physician assistant programs at McMaster University and the University of Toronto, and the Ontario Veterinary College at the University of Guelph hold MMI interviews. Health-related programs at the Michener Institute in Toronto host MMI interviews as well, and regardless of the program applied to at the Michener Institute, candidates move through the same stations.
Information on interview process and format often changes. The most up-to-date information for each school can be found on each program’s individual website.
An applicant interacts with an actor, and there is an observer in the room.
For example, “You are roommates with Alex. She hasn’t done her share of dishes in the last month and leaves her belongings all over the apartment. Her room is starting to smell from the leftover food/dishes she leaves out. Enter the room and discuss this situation with her.”
There is no right or wrong answer when you are answering a critical thinking question. Many of these questions contain an ethical component, and the idea is to minimize the negative outcome for anyone involved in the ethical dilemma presented to you. Be consistent in your response even if the interviewer tries to sway your opinion by adding new information partway through your answer. On the other hand, if the new information has a great impact one way or the other, clearly state your justification for changing your opinion. For health-related admission interviews, answers should always be patient-focused. Health care is about objectivity, best health care, and best outcomes from a medical standpoint, not what a person can contribute to society.
Identify the issues in the question, make sure you understand exactly what is being asked, and address the issue(s) raised. Endeavour to provide unbiased and neutral solutions. Rather than start with the outcome you best subscribe to, lead the interviewer to the conclusion with your evidence-based reasoning. Wherever possible, try to back up your claims with proof (e.g., items in the news, journal articles, and other research from valid and verifiable sources).
One approach to ethical questions is to use the PESTLE model (Orfano, 2011). PESTLE stands for:
Choose three to four of these perspectives and evaluate the situation. Avoid having your argument seem one sided. Ensure that you are evaluating both pros and cons for the different PESTLE perspectives. In addition, know regulations and your own ethical considerations — what is the scope of your authority and extent of your obligation?
If you are unprepared to answer the question, ask the interviewer to clarify the question and/or to provide some probing or leading questions. If that is not possible, attempt to address the part(s) of the question for which you have some knowledge. Responses to ethical questions can be fairly long. Towards the end of your response, use phrases such as “in conclusion” or “in summary” or “as a final recommendation” or “given the above, I believe” to indicate that you are concluding your response.
For example, “In some countries there is presumed consent for organ donation (it is assumed that you wish to donate your viable organs unless you opt out). Canada has the opposite system where you must sign up to be an organ donor. Do you think we should have presumed consent in Canada? Discuss this issue with the interviewer.”
When possible, show empathy and compassion when working through the PESTLE model (or another model of choice):
With the PESTLE model: Focus on three to four perspectives and have pros/cons for each.
In most cases pros/cons should be patient-centered, student-centered, client-centered, etc. Also show who else will be affected by the situation, don’t just focus on the people listed in the situation (if the situation is about a child think about how it will affect their parent(s), siblings, teachers, school, educational system, etc.).
P: Political pros/cons: government interventions/taxes/policies can influence health & education
E: Economic pros/cons: save/spend time and money
S: Social pros/cons: cultural aspects, health consciousness, population growth, age distribution, career attributes
T: Technological pros/cons: R&D activity, automation, changes and innovation
L: Legal pros/cons: legal implications
E: Ethical pros/cons: ethical dilemmas OR Environmental pros/cons: weather, climate change, tourism, farming
Other models to address ethical questions are ABCDE of Medical Ethics (Levine, 1994) and CARVE (Gampel):
Transcript: Critical thinking station: PESTLE feedback (DOCX)
Transcript: Critical thinking station: people perspective (DOCX)
Transcript: Critical thinking station: people perspective feedback (DOCX)
Two candidates work together to complete a task, and one or two observers are present. One applicant will deliver instructions/explain (generally referred to as the leader) and the other applicant (generally referred to as the follower) will complete a task (e.g., puzzle building, drawing). The process is repeated at another station and the roles are reversed. You may or not be with the same candidate. Typically, you are placed back to back with your partner so you cannot see each other.
A common scenario is: “Guide your partner to complete this puzzle. At the end of the station you will be given time to provide feedback to each other”.
Generally there are two candidates at this station and two observers. Each candidate is presented with a side to argue. Typically, after three to five minutes of discussion, you will need to verbally evaluate yourself and the other candidate.
For example, “Candidate 1 believes that the Olympics are a waste of money; candidate 2 disagrees. Defend your position to the other candidate.”
When you enter a health-related profession, generally you will be taught how to deliver bad news to a patient. While it is not expected that you know how to do this in your admissions interview, often you will be asked about this to get a sense of your empathy and compassion. For example, “How would you tell a 65-year-old woman she has cancer?” Sometimes this scenario is used with an MMI acting/role play station. A tip for delivering bad news is to keep your facial expressions neutral. As a health care professional, you want to be careful about displaying emotion when delivering bad news. This format is taught in medical school and may be helpful:
SPIKES was developed by Robert Buckman, MD, Associate Professor of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto and modified from the original version (Sandrick, K.1998).
Sometimes candidates are asked how they would react to a scenario that involves an ethical component such as witnessing cheating/stealing, or other unethical behaviours. How you respond/react to these situations indicates how you will act in your profession.
Consider both your ethical actions and the interpersonal situation.
For example, “You see your coworker carrying work equipment to their personal car. How do you handle the situation?”
These stations are used to test future MMI stations, although they will not be identified as such.
These stations are used to test future MMI stations, although they will not be identified as such.
These stations are used to test future MMI stations, although they will not be identified as such.
In this type of station, candidates are allowed to rest and sometimes offered water or can talk to a current student.
Students have said that the break station throws them off during the actual MMI. Do not take the time to rehash all of the previous stations, or work yourself up over what questions could be next. Take a break from talking if that is what you need and try to breathe and relax. If there is a current student at the rest station to speak to, be polite and interact with them. Use the conversation to help calm your nerves/get your mind off of waiting.
In this type of station, candidates are allowed to rest and sometimes offered water or can talk to a current student.
Students have said that the break station throws them off during the actual MMI. Do not take the time to rehash all of the previous stations, or work yourself up over what questions could be next. Take a break from talking if that is what you need and try to breathe and relax. If there is a current student at the rest station to speak to, be polite and interact with them. Use the conversation to help calm your nerves/get your mind off of waiting.
Sometimes, even MMI interviews have one or two stations that ask standard/panel interview questions. Please read the Standard professional school interviews questions and recommended models for more information. Common standard questions for health professions generally include: “Why do you want to be a _________?” “Tell me about a time when you did __________”. “What do you know about the profession?”
In many stations it is important to demonstrate your knowledge of the current trends, policies, challenges, and changing roles of health care practitioners. Keep up to date with the governing body for your future profession, and make sure to watch/read the news as much as possible to be aware of current events. Some of these questions can include sensitive topics like physician-assisted suicide, stem cell research, abortion, aboriginal and alternative medicine, access to care in rural populations, as well as school specific teaching methods or curriculum
For example, “What is the biggest challenge currently facing the profession of _________?” or “If the Prime Minister of Canada asked you to recommend one change to our health care system that would make the biggest impact, what would you recommend?”
In this station, candidates review a short video and then write answers to (generally) standard ethical, situational, and behaviour-based questions.
Applicants are ranked at each station by the interviewer or observer. Interviewers do not discuss their rankings with other interviewers, so you are independently rated by each interviewer which eliminates bias.
The evaluation criterion varies each year. The interviewer is provided with a list of criteria that the school is looking for in a candidate. Depending on the school you might be given marks for: demeanor, maturity, intellect, compassion, overall impression, communication, English fluency, ability to organize, integrity in ethics, critical-thinking skills, soft skills identified in the question, incorporating personal examples. You will be rewarded for being methodical and articulate. Interviewers want to see how you process information. You can read McMaster’s Manual for Interviewers online to see an example evaluation form.
Prefer to learn in person? Attend the MMI Simulation workshop to practice answering questions and improve your skills.
Gampel, E. H. A Framework for Moral Reasoning. Retrieved from http://www.csuchico.edu/~egampel/students/solving2.htm
Levine, D. (1994). Physician-patient Communication in the Urban Clinical Setting. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359272/pdf/bullnyacadmed01039-0058.pdf
Orfano, F. (2011). Components of a PESTLE Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.brighthub.com/office/project-management/articles/51754.html
Sandrick, K. (1998). Codified principles enhance physician/patient communication. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, 83(11), 13-17.
The interview is an exchange of information between you and the interviewer(s). It is used to help assess interest in, and suitability (i.e., competencies) for the program of study, and fit for the field/profession. To make this assessment, the interview committee will endeavour to obtain information about your skills, values (personal ethics), personality, and interests. Interviewers may be interested in your integrity (personal and professional accountability), maturity, compassion, sincerity, honesty, originality, curiosity, intelligence, confidence, motivation, leadership skills, communication skills, ability to relate to others, cultural and social interests, work and volunteer experiences, knowledge of relevant issues and events, and, in some cases, your ability to withstand the emotional/physical demands of the profession.
Succeeding in an interview may depend on your professional appearance and the interviewer’s first impression of you. If the first impression is not positive, it will be difficult to change the interviewer’s mind during the rest of the interview.
Arrive early, dressed in attire appropriate for the type of admissions interview you are attending. For health and business-related interviews dress conservatively and keep fashion accessories to a minimum. Avoid wearing strong scents (or any at all) because many people have environmental allergies. Ensure your cell phone is turned off.
Greet each person with respect and professionalism. When you shake hands, make eye contact and smile. Handshakes should be firm but not aggressive; try to match the grip of the interviewer. Standard North American practice is to shake hands at the beginning and end of an interview. However, if you are not comfortable with this practice tell the interviewer that you prefer not to shake hands and why. It is good etiquette to wait to sit down until the interviewer invites you to do so.
Don’t worry about being a little nervous during the interview; being nervous is normal and expected. Remember, the interviewer wants you to have the right qualifications and interest in the profession. Many interviewers will begin the interview with some “small talk” to help you relax. This may seem irrelevant to the program, but you are still being evaluated; be sure to demonstrate a positive attitude.
To demonstrate effectively your suitability and value, you must know yourself. Review your self-assessment information, volunteer experiences, application, personal statement/letter of intent, and your résumé. Be prepared to give examples to substantiate all claims. Some interviewers will want you to talk about your mistakes and what lessons you learned from them. Ensure that your responses are sufficiently detailed. This is especially important in “closed” or “blind” interviews where committee members may not have been privy to your complete application.
Review professional and regulatory bodies’ websites to be familiar with the current profession, future directions, and the competencies important for someone in the field. It is important to demonstrate your genuine interest in and fit for the profession. Read the notes you made as you reviewed print and online materials, during volunteer opportunities/job shadowing, and when you talked with others. Keep current with events and new research. Many of the MMI stations will be relevant to current topics in the news, both health- and non-health related. The best way to gather this information is to follow the news, review association websites, and to speak with professionals in the field. Your interpersonal skills will be a particularly important factor in people-focused professions as you will be required to be approachable and to work closely with patients/students/clients.
To prepare for the interview, ensure that you research the faculty/program and, if appropriate, the interviewers’ areas of expertise in order to understand the nuances of each. If possible, visit the campus and talk to current students in the program, attend classes, and visit labs.
The order in which you deliver the content of your answer indicates your priorities. For example if your answer to: “Why do you want to be a doctor?” is “... to help patients, conduct research, teach” this will create a more positive impression than “... a high income, prestige, to help patients.”
Awkward situations may occur during an interview, and it is up to you to be prepared to confidently handle whatever happens. To increase your confidence and preparation for an interview, practise. Check for quality of information in your answers and the positive, non-verbal reinforcement of your words. By practising responses out loud, you can hear your answers and assess their effectiveness. But don’t practise so much that you lose your spontaneity and your answers sound rehearsed.
The key to tricky situations is to remember that barriers to admission can often be overcome by focusing on the positive. Circumstances that you may find problematic are:
If you answer a question and there is no prompt response or follow-up question, try to remain calm and collected. Silence may not be a negative sign; the interviewer could be taking time to process and record your answer, and/or be considering the next question.
In response to uncomfortable silence, ask the interviewers if they require any further details regarding your last response, shifting the responsibility to them. Resist the temptation to ramble because you may provide irrelevant information that may hurt your chances of being offered admission.
Although the interviewer will likely take notes, generally you should not. If you have your head down writing, the conversation will be uncomfortable and unengaging because of your lack of eye contact and inability to show enthusiasm.
Making brief notes is acceptable when you need to record information that may be easily forgotten, such as a key word, phone number, or contact information. If you fear you may not recall other pertinent details, document the information immediately after the interview.
You may have difficulty communicating your thoughts clearly and concisely, especially when you are not sure how to respond to a question. The key is to remain calm and positive, focus on the question, and continue to remind yourself that you are doing well. You may request clarification if you are not sure what the interviewer is asking, or pause and politely ask for a few moments to consider your response; however, don’t take too much time because interviewers want to see that you can think well under pressure.
After a brief pause, if you still cannot respond to the interviewer’s question, you may ask to defer your answer to the end of the interview. The risk is that interviews usually follow a certain structure and the question might be missed entirely, leaving the interviewer with an unanswered question. If you’re stumped because you simply do not know the answer, be honest with the interviewer and, depending on the type of question, discuss how you would handle the situation or resources you would use to find the answer.
Interviewers will often ask negatively phrased questions to assess your perceived weaknesses and strengths. The following are a few examples:
Be honest and discuss a real weakness or past event that would not negatively impact performance for the profession/field you are applying for. Avoid the popular advice to turn a weakness into a strength (e.g., “I’m a perfectionist...”) because this kind of response is unconvincing and over used. Be sure to end your “weakness” response on a positive note by indicating what steps you are taking to overcome the weakness.
It is important to keep your answers short and to be as positive as possible, even when answering a negatively framed question.
It is a pleasure to be interviewed by someone who is enthusiastic about the profession, but it is not desirable if you aren’t able to market yourself because the interviewer monopolizes the discussion. Tactfully break into the conversation to help keep the interview focused on the subject you know best: you! You might say, “I had a similar experience...” or “It’s interesting that you say that because I am also skilled in...”
Is your body or verbal language contributing to the problem? Without being rude, offer less acknowledgement (e.g., nodding, “that’s interesting,” “really?”). If you are not given adequate time to market your qualifications and the interview is drawing to a close, request a few moments to summarize your qualifications for the profession/field, highlighting key points you had planned to discuss.
What should you do if you’re in the middle of an interview and have just been asked what is clearly an illegal question? There is no clear-cut answer. Much depends on you.
In some cases, you may be able to answer the “hidden” question. Think of what information the interviewer is trying to elicit. For example, “Do you have or plan to have children?” may indicate a concern about your ability to put in the time to complete the program.
You may elect to say “Why do you ask?” or “Would you explain how this point is connected to the qualifications for this program?” This could cause the interviewer to reconsider or clarify the question. It may offend some interviewers, but probably not the majority.
If you feel that you should not answer the question (you shouldn’t have to, after all) or that you are not interested in attending the program, you may state, “I don’t feel obligated to answer that” or “That question is inappropriate.” If you choose this option, you will either enlighten (the interviewer may not realize it is illegal and will be happy that you pointed it out), or offend (the interviewer may not consider you for the program). At some schools there is a post-interview evaluation, so a candidate can report illegal questions.
It is best not to bring up your religious beliefs in your answers. Interviewers for health-related professions could worry that when you are practising in your profession, and not being supervised, you might present different religious options to a patient and this isn’t the expected practice. As a health-care provider you need to look at things objectively and not present your own ideologies.
Smile when appropriate during the interview. Be enthusiastic and responsive. As you talk about your past and present activities, your passion and energy can be communicated both through your words and your body language (e.g., an excited tone of voice, leaning forward, nodding your head in agreement). Maintaining eye contact is important; failure to do so may imply a lack of confidence or, worse, cause the interviewer to question your truthfulness.
Sit comfortably, without slouching. Don’t put anything on your lap or in your hands if it will restrict your natural body movement or if you may be tempted to play with it. Keep your clipboard, note pad, briefcase, or portfolio on the floor beside your chair for easy retrieval.
Respond to questions specifically and concisely but give sufficient details to enable the interviewer to evaluate your credentials. Interviewers become frustrated when they have to listen to long, rambling answers. Think before you speak. It is quite acceptable to pause before talking in order to organize your thoughts. Avoid verbal fillers such as “um,” “ah,” “you know,” or regularly repeating the question to provide thinking time.
Use professional language. Avoid slang. Speak clearly. Watch the interviewer for clues on how the interview is progressing. Is the interviewer’s face or body language telling you that your answers are too long, not detailed enough, too boring? If in doubt, ask the interviewer if more or fewer details are needed.
Prepare in advance to talk about any topic that you feel uncomfortable about. If there is something that you don’t want an interviewer to inquire about, it will likely be raised during the interview. Practise your answer out loud often enough to feel confident, and to decrease your emotions surrounding the answer (e.g., “Tell me about your most painful experience”). Maintain poise and self-control. Consider a difficult issue as a learning opportunity that has made you a better person.
This is an interview where one interviewer conducts an interview with one candidate. This is typical for MBA and graduate school interviews.
For health-related interviews it is common for there to be a panel of interviewers. Often this consists of a faculty member or someone in the profession, a current student, and a community member. Each interviewer will be assessing you differently (e.g., a community member will assess if they would choose you as a professional).
Although it is important to have good eye contact with the person who asks you a question, also look at the other interviewers frequently to include them in the discussion. Try to remember each person’s name and use his or her name during the interview.
The interview process often includes meeting with current students and a tour of the site, so wear comfortable shoes.
If given the choice between an on- or off-campus interview (common for MBA), try to arrange an on-campus interview. This will give you the opportunity to talk to current students, sit in on a class, see the campus, and get a better sense whether this is the right school and location for you. However, if you are not able to attend an on-campus interview, you will not be penalized.
All of the usual advice about interview skills still applies. Your attire is your choice, but you may find that dressing professionally increases your confidence and allows you to perform better. Keep your application, school information, points that you want to highlight, and list of questions handy; in fact, keep these in front of you during the interview for easy reference. (Don’t shuffle your papers though!) Have a pen and paper available to note any comments or questions that may occur to you during the interview. Choose your words carefully and be succinct. It is also important to vary your voice tone, tempo, and pitch to keep the interviewer’s attention. Ensure that you are in a private setting to eliminate any distractions or background noise.
In this type of interview, interviewers use video technology to conduct interviews at a distance. Use the same strategies as you would if you were meeting in person. Depending on the sophistication of the technology, you may experience short transmission delays. Make eye contact with the camera, which, to the interviewer, appears as direct “eye contact.” Remember to check the monitor periodically to observe the interviewer’s body language.
After each interview, evaluate how well you did by completing the following “Interview evaluation worksheet”
Save this list to record how you perform during interviews and to document your progress.
Standard interview format is when candidates are asked a series of questions in front of one or more admission panelists. The main portion of the interview consists of the interviewer asking you questions to try to determine your fit. Generally, you have an opportunity to ask any questions that you may have at the end of the interview.
Practice your interview skills by signing up for the Professional School Interviews (Standard) workshop.
Behaviour-based interviews are designed to elicit information about how you have performed in the past because past behaviour is a good indicator of how you will function in the future. Interviewers develop their questions around the traits and skills they consider necessary for succeeding in a profession. Occasionally, behaviour-based questions are used in the MMI interview format as well. These questions usually begin with phrases such as:
Some applicants find the format of such questions difficult to understand and have trouble responding. However, if you have done your research and have prepared for the interview, you will have work, academic, volunteer, and life experiences ready to share. You can prepare for behaviour-based questions by recalling specific instances that demonstrate your accomplishments, abilities, and fit for the profession/field. Be certain to tell the truth, get to the point, stay focused and positive, and be consistent with your responses. Common behaviour-based interview themes include the following:
Next Step: Work through your résumé to find specific examples for each theme above. Use the STAR approach to describe each example.
The “STAR Approach” is a useful technique for answering behaviour-based questions:
Situation: Provide Background and context:
Task: Describe what you needed to do
Action: Explain what you actually did and how you did it
Result: Describe the outcome of your actions
For example, in response to the query “What experience do you have organizing projects?” you determine that the qualification being evaluated is organizational skills. Your skill/knowledge/ability statement could be, “I have developed excellent organizational skills by working on two major projects. The one I would like to tell you about ended successfully six months ago.”
Every statement you make must be true. Don’t lie or embellish. Ideally, the example you choose should be something that requires a competency similar to the typical work of the prospective professional. If you do not have a similar experience to relate, try to choose the most relevant story from your academic, extracurricular or volunteer activities — do not make it up! Describe the what, who, when, where, why, and how, and talk about the successful outcome or what you learned from the experience.
As you tell the story allow the interviewer to see or live through the action with you. Choose words that will help the interviewer visualize you in the experience (e.g., “It was five minutes before closing on the busiest night of the year when the power went out...”). Whenever possible, include positive feedback from supervisors, colleagues, professors, and others to reinforce your accomplishment. Humour, if used appropriately, can also be an effective tool, because it helps the interviewer to remember you.
The next step is the one that most candidates forget. Tell the interviewer what specific benefits or competitive advantage you can bring to the profession/field because of the experience you have just described. For example, “As part of the team being formed, I would be able to coordinate....” Avoid generic statements such as, “All professions need people with leadership ability.”
An interviewer will use situational/hypothetical questions to establish how you would react to and handle real-life situations. For situational/hypothetical questions, candidates must have a good understanding of the profession and its requirements. Here are some examples of this type of question:
When answering problem-solving questions demonstrate your ability to process information quickly, think logically, and solve creatively. Interviewers place emphasis on the thought process rather than on the conclusion. Examples of problem-solving questions include the following:
The key is not to worry about getting the “right” answer but, rather, to demonstrate your logical thought process in solving the problem. The following five-step process is appropriate for handling most problem-solving questions:
Keep in mind, there is no right answer, only your answer.
In addition to asking the other types of questions mentioned, many interviewers rely on a series of standard questions, and you should prepare for them. Occasionally, classic interview questions are used in the MMI interview format as well.
While preparation is key, it is not possible to predict and prepare for all interview questions. Instead, review your résumé, application, and research the profession (current and future state). Then put information into different categories (e.g., accomplishments, understanding of profession, unique qualities, challenges/weaknesses) enabling you to provide examples as necessary.
The “PAWS” model is a useful method for answering classic questions such as “Tell me about yourself” and “Why do you want to be a ___________?”
When an interviewer asks this question, s/he is looking for those aspects of your life that are relevant to the profession/field, such as how you became interested in the field, related experience, and courses taken. “PAWS” stands for Profile, Academic, Work, and Skills. Include all or as many of the four (in any order) to reinforce your fit for the field/profession.
Here are some examples of what to discuss in each of the four areas:
Profile: Mention how you became interested in this field and point out any relevant community involvement, extracurricular activities, memberships, and personal interests that further demonstrate your commitment to the field
Academic: Talk about your educational background (degrees/diplomas/certifications) and other related training and professional development initiatives/courses that you have participated in
Work: Highlight paid or unpaid (volunteer) experiences related to the profession
Skills: Refer to specific skills/competencies that relate to the profession or field (e.g., communication, interpersonal, time management, problem-solving skills)
Please read Delivering bad news stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews.
Please read Ethical scenario stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews
To supplement the information you obtained before the interview, you should ask questions during the interview (although you will not have this opportunity with MMI interviews). Some questions will arise naturally during the interview, but it is wise to prepare a number of questions in advance. Asking questions will demonstrate your interest and help you determine if the program/school fits your personality, skills, interests, and values.
Your questions should pertain to the program/school and show your enthusiasm and knowledge. By asking intelligent, well-thought-out questions that genuinely matter to you, you will convince the interviewer that you are serious about the program and institution. If a question has been answered during the interview, do not ask it again; such repetition will suggest that you were not listening. It is important to compose your own questions; however, the following may give you a starting point:
You have several options when pursuing your formal education goals: graduate programs in academic subjects (e.g., Master’s or Ph.D programs); professional programs (e.g., law school, medical school, dental school); post-diploma and professional programs at colleges that generally require a Bachelor’s degree to qualify for application and can sometimes exist as a joint program with a university; or other educational opportunities (e.g., courses offered through the Human Resources Professionals Association of Ontario or the Canadian Securities Institute).
Now that you have decided to enrol in a graduate or professional program, the first step is to choose the program that will best meet your needs. Talk to professors, admissions staff, graduate students, and alumni to help you determine which program to enter. Ask about each school’s reputation in the field. Contact the department or faculty of the school you want to attend to get further information; administrators may start a file based on this initial contact. Finally, a campus visit can go a long way towards helping you make an informed decision.
It may be helpful to find a professor who shares your interests and who will act as a mentor. This professor may be willing to help you identify the programs that are best suited to your interests and assist you in the selection and application processes. Also consider contacting the graduate student associations at your universities of interest as well as relevant professional associations: they may provide you with first-hand, up-to-date insights into programs.
As a Health Studies co-op student, Rachel McDonald spent five co-op work terms at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. She coordinated the rapid response radiotherapy program, which provides palliative radiation treatment to advanced cancer patients. Over five co-op terms, Rachel collected, analyzed and published data as the lead author on seven papers in peer-reviewed journals. She was even flown to Miami and Copenhagen to present research on quality of life and bone metastases.
Rachel was accepted into two of Canada’s most prestigious medical schools: Queens University and University of Toronto. Now, she is in her second year of medical school at the University of Toronto.
I think a lot of people underestimate the power of co-op. Work hard, be diligent and take initiative to do things outside of just what the position entails.
Rachel McDonald, co-op stream
Honours Science student Colin Whaley appreciated the consistency of the regular stream of study, which allowed him to tailor his classes and extracurriculars during his fall/winter study terms. In just five years, Colin was able to complete three honours thesis courses (biology, health and kinesiology), work as a Teaching Assistant and publish two papers. He also volunteered with campus clubs and services like the Campus Response Team and MATES Peer Counselling Group and even co-founded his own club that has sent around 100 volunteers to deliver technology training to seniors in long-term care homes and hospitals.
After working as a researcher at the Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre and completing the graduate program at the University of Waterloo’s School of Pharmacy, Colin was accepted to a number of Canadian medical schools. He will now be attending Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster University.
Get involved, build relationships and maintain an open mind towards different fields of research and practice. This can take you down some really interesting paths.
Colin Whaley, regular stream
It is important that you understand how your grades will be calculated, as each graduate and professional school has different rules and methods of evaluation.
They might look at one (or some) of the following factors:
If you are in co-op, your co-op sequence could affect the way your grades are calculated when applying to professional schools as some programs expect you to complete two study terms per academic year (typically from September-August) in order to count as a year of study or towards the grades in your GPA.
Graduate school grade calculations are not typically impacted by your co-op sequence.
Depending on where you will be applying, the application and start timelines, document conventions, and program structure may be different. It is important to research the conventions in the location you are applying to.
If you are applying outside of Canada you will need to meet immigration requirements in the country you will be living in. Immigration requirements vary widely; you will need to research them thoroughly as part of your planning. You may also need to show proof that you can pay tuition when you enter the country where you will study.
Depending on your immigration status in the country where you will study, you may be considered an international student. International students often pay higher tuition. Some programs in the United States give special status to Canadian applicants.
Some institutions have rolling admissions, which means applications are accepted at any time or before the advertised deadline. Admissions committees will review a complete file and make offers and funding decisions based on an applicant’s file. Applying early to a program can help you secure a spot before more competitive applications are received.
Some programs have several admission categories (e.g., regular, mature, special consideration, access). The Grade Point Average (GPA) requirement and admission test scores may vary based on competition from individuals in a particular applicant pool. It is not detrimental to apply to a category other than “regular.” Showing that you maintained a good GPA while dealing with special circumstances can work to your advantage.
Ascertain which of the following are required:
Identify what types and levels of previous education are required. For some professional programs, a completed undergraduate degree is not required. When applying to a graduate program, you usually need a degree in the same area, but not in every case.
If you are considering completing a graduate degree to boost your GPA to enter a professional program, be aware that most will not consider your graduate GPA. Most professional programs only consider your undergrad GPA.
Generally, no extra consideration is given if you are currently, or have been, a student at the university to which you are applying.
Some programs require certain prerequisites to assess whether an applicant is ready to successfully complete a program. Often prerequisite courses need to meet a GPA cutoff. Prerequisites can change, so keep up to date on each program’s requirements.
Check with the admission’s office about necessary prerequisites if the information is not clear on their website: you can send a course description (including the URL) and course syllabus for the course(s) you determine meets the prerequisite requirements. The more information provided to an admissions office, hopefully, the faster the response time. Try to obtain written confirmation from the admissions office, as a paper trail will provide proof that the courses you have completed meet the school’s requirements. There are many programs that will not evaluate prerequisites until you have completed and paid for the application. Some institutions provide a list of courses accepted from other universities.
Some programs allow you to complete prerequisites as late as the term prior to the program start date, while others do not. Always verify the latest date of graduation (or prerequisite completion) accepted.
Please note that staff in the Centre for Career Development cannot advise you about whether courses meet a program’s prerequisites.
Admission requirements usually state the minimum GPA required to be admitted to a program. If this is not clear, contact the school to find out the GPA requirement and how it is computed. Different possibilities might include: a cumulative average, your grades for the last two years, your grades in your major, the last year of study, or marks in courses related to the program, and so on. The minimum requirement varies by program and a competitive GPA is typically higher than the minimum. The minimum GPA for a Master’s program is usually 75%. If you have a lower GPA in your last or last one or two years of study, this will be a red flag for admissions officers, as it can be interpreted to indicate either that you will not be successful in a graduate program, or that you have not grasped the core concepts required for a graduate/professional program.
The required GPA for professional programs tends to be in the low 80’s. If applying while completing a 4-year degree, most programs only consider 4A term marks and earlier, or in some cases 3B marks and earlier.
Institutions use either a 10-point or a 4-point scale, so it is important to ask how your average will be converted. Visit the program website to see if GPAs are posted for previous years. If you are applying to faculties of law, medicine, or rehab sciences in Ontario, the Ontario Universities’ Application Centre (OUAC) has GPA conversion charts published for each type of program.
For an international or exchange term, the program may need a World Education Service (WES) conversion of your grades. Allow enough time for grade conversion through WES or to order and send transcripts by the deadline date.
When applying to any graduate or professional program, check if an admission test is required and what the deadline is for score submission. If an admission test score is required, be aware that stellar results can often balance out a mediocre GPA, and that, conversely, the opposite is also true.
Some programs accept test scores after the application deadline. In most cases, test results are available four to six weeks after the test date. If you are applying to a program with rolling admissions, a complete application package (including test scores) is required before your application can be evaluated.
Prepare thoroughly for the test you need to write; plan to write it just once. At the same time, though, it is advisable that you write an admission test early enough that you could rewrite it if necessary. Determine how recent your score must be for any given application, plus how multiple scores are handled (e.g., do they consider the highest score, or do they take an average of all scores achieved?). Do not write an admission test the first time without preparing just to “try it out,” as admission committees sometimes have access to score cancellations. Note that there is a waiting period for retaking admission tests and that they can often only be retaken a limited number of times.
Allow enough time to register for the test, order study materials, study, and, if desired, attend a preparation course. Some University of Waterloo clubs on campus hold practice tests, so check their websites for information. The Centre for Career Development has practice test books that you can borrow. A link to admission test information is available on the Centre for Career Development website. Some admission tests are written at a computer-based testing centre. On the test date, you may be required to provide a list of schools that you are applying to.
Here is a list of admission tests:
The Graduate Records Examination (GRE) may be required for application to graduate schools. There is a GRE general test and a GRE subject test, but not all schools require both test results. The GRE general test is written at a computer-based testing site and has several sections: verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, and analytical writing. Contact the programs to which you are applying to determine if they use the results from every section. Doing so may help you to decide if you need to rewrite the test if your test results were low in certain sections.
The GRE subject test is a paper-based test written at testing sites across Canada. The test can be taken as often as it is offered (i.e., April, October, and November). If your scores are good, it may be to your advantage to submit them to all schools, even to those that do not require them.
The GRE is generally not required by Canadian programs if your undergraduate education was completed in Canada or the United States, but it is almost always required for graduate programs in the United States.
Only you can decide if you want to take an admission-test preparation course. Be sure to do your research to determine the value of such preparation. It is recommended that you check whether: the course fits your learning style; the course is offered online or in-person; the course is available weekends or evenings; the instructor’s experience teaching the course materials is substantial; the course covers topic content, strategies, practice tests, or too much of any one of these; the duration of the course is manageable. A longer course is not necessarily better; some companies include the amount of time spent on practice tests in their total time calculations. It is useful to use previously administered tests as a preparation tool. These are often available through the test registration site. If possible, complete practice tests in the format in which you will have to write: paper or computer-based. Each company has different teaching strategies and it can be confusing to use multiple sources of information. Some companies provide University of Waterloo students discounts; for details, visit the list of preparation courses on the Centre for Career Development’s website.
Some programs have language proficiency requirements. If your native language is English OR you have completed the four full years of your undergraduate degree at an English speaking institution, a test is generally not required. Some programs may waive the admission test scores if you can provide proof of proficiency from other sources such as courses, but if they recommend you take it — do it!
You may need to take the International English Language Testing System (IELTS); the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL); Test of Written English (TWE); or Test of English as a Foreign Language, Test of Spoken English (TOEFL TSE).
Ascertain if any type of experience is necessary to a successful application (i.e., volunteer, extra-curricular, or work). If so, consider which type(s) are required and what would be the most relevant experiences within each type (e.g., work experience is mandatory when applying to most MBA programs). If you are applying to a graduate program, research experience can be a plus. If you are applying to a health-related professional program, in most cases experience from within the profession is necessary. Use experiences from work, volunteering, extra-curricular activities, memberships in clubs/teams, and shadowing to show the depth of your understanding about the profession you want to enter in your application.
Well-rounded students who show leadership qualities, relate well to others, and possess organizational skills have an edge in the application process. In fact, according to Scholarships Canada, involvement in extra-curricular activities can greatly increase your chances of receiving a scholarship. However, admission committees also recognize that over-involvement in such activities can adversely affect your GPA, so be sure to engage only in the number of activities that you can effectively manage.
Professional Associations and Clubs (Applied Health Sciences Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Arts Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Engineering Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Environment Faculty) (PDF)
Even though many students apply to research-based Master’s programs without any research experience, having it can provide a competitive advantage. It is highly recommended that if you apply for a direct entry Ph.D program that you do get prior research experience. Start thinking about what interests you, and try to gain experience in this area. This will help you find a program and potential supervisor. The University of Waterloo library site has an extensive list of research databases to view journal articles and find what fascinates you.
To gain research experiences seek out opportunities such as the NSERC Undergraduate Research Awards (USRA) positions. Applications for an NSERC USRA are very competitive. Some departments offer University Research Assistantships that could provide research experience.
Securing an Undergraduate Research Internship (URI) would allow you to hold a research position with a professor; these opportunities are managed by Co-operative and Experiential Education and the program is open to regular and co-op students. Be proactive and approach a professor, tell them about the program, and provide the URL so they can complete the application.
Another option is to volunteer in a lab on campus where permitted. You could run experiments or even conduct basic literature reviews for professors or grad students. Approach faculty members and explain how your skills and background will be an asset to their research. Consider the faculty member’s perspective and do not focus just on what you will get out of the experience.
Often your fourth year design project or final thesis course and paper will provide research exposure. If you are in a co-op program, you can look for research-based work terms at Waterloo, other institutions, or in industry.
Seek to publish your work whenever possible. It will be especially important if applying to a Ph.D program — giving you a competitive edge. You do not have to be the first author. Take any opportunity to contribute to a study, write up a journal article, or participate in a conference presentation/abstract.
Talk to a faculty member to find out how you could turn your senior-year course project into a publication.
What is CASPer®?
CASPer® (Computer–based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics) is an admissions test that assesses interpersonal and non–cognitive skills like communication, collaboration, interpersonal, ethical–decision making, empathy, compassion, integrity, etc. through a scenario–based format. The scenarios are largely ethical in nature and the questions asked gauge your personal attributes and characteristics using concrete examples of real–world situations.
CASPer® is not a knowledge–based test.
Who uses CASPer®?
CASPer® is increasingly being used by many professional programs, and is common health–related programs such as medicine, nursing, optometry, pharmacy, and more. Programs can add CASPer® to their list of requirements for any application cycle, so check the information for the year of your application cycle.
How do I find out if I need CASPer®?
There are two ways to find out if you need to take CASPer® for your application(s):
What is the CASPer® testing process like?
CASPer® is a computer–based online test, meaning you can take this test in any environment with a reliable internet connection and minimal distractions. The test is 90 minutes in length and is comprised of 10–12 sections. Each section will present a video or written scenario. You can only watch the video or read the written passage once per scenario. Following each scenario, applicants are required to type out an answer three questions in five minutes. Each response is graded by a different marker, so 10–12 people mark your CASPer® test.
Very few schools are explicit about the possible ways that CASPer® scores are used in their admission decisions.
How many times do I need to take the test?
You will need to take the test at least once for every year you apply, as your test scores are only valid for one year.
Generally, the content of the CASPer® test is unique to each program type and country, so you may need to take the test more than once in a cycle if you are applying to multiple program types. However, if you are applying to the professions of dentistry, medicine and optometry in Canada you will write the test once during an admissions cycle. If you are applying to both Canadian and US medical schools, you need to write the US and Canadian CASPer® test.
How can I prepare for CASPer®?
There are many different ways you could prepare yourself for the CASPer® test. There isn’t one right way to prepare for this or any other admissions test. But in general, exposing yourself to the testing format, familiarizing yourself with relevant content, and finding an approach that works for you so you can structure your thoughts and move through the content quickly are key to doing your best.
Check the Test Prep page of CASPer®’s website for their tips to prepare for your test day.
You can test out some common strategies and see which ones help you to best organize your thoughts and make sure that you’re addressing all the questions.
If you are looking for more specific tips and tricks to help you prepare and be successful writing CASPer®, think about some combination of these options:
If you’re not sure where to start, drop by the Centre for Career Development library in the Tatham Centre.
How should I format my responses?
There isn’t one right format for a CASPer® response, but finding a format or strategy that works well for you can help you respond effectively and avoid getting bogged down in organizational details that have little bearing on how your response is scored. Test out different options and see which works best for you and the way your brain likes to organize information. Here’s one example:
Here’s one recommended format on how to approach CASPer®:
Due to the limited time to answer each question it may be helpful to use this format:
Are there test prep courses for CASPer®?
There are companies that offer CASPer® prep courses; however, UWaterloo students that provided feedback after writing CASPer® do not think they are necessary, nor do Admission Directors. At minimum, it will be helpful to understand the CASPer® format and strategies on how to write it.
Should you decide that practice and preparation are useful for you, check out the preparation program supported by CASPer® here.
What kinds of questions will they ask?
Generally, they’re asking reflective questions about your approach or action–oriented response to a specific scenario. The scenarios are ethical in nature, meaning there is no one right answer and typically multiple perspectives to be considered. The scenarios and following questions may or may not be health–related, but they certainly will relate to your ability to analyze a complex situation and communicate with others. Here are some examples to start:
Example 1
Video shows two people arguing about a convicted pedophile, John, who will be released soon from jail and will be living in their neighbourhood. Do you agree with this decision to release John?
Questions:
Example 2
Personal Descriptor CASPer® example: Consider the experiences you have and insight gained from these experiences that led you to believe that you would be a good physician.
Questions:
Example 3
Video of Head of Athletic Department talking to a mother who was complaining about her child not being selected for a team. Mother’s question at the end of the scenario was “Are you going to continue to allow this?”
Questions:
Example 4
Personal Descriptor CASPer® example: Talk about a stressful situation you have encountered.
Follow–up questions:
Can I get access to sample questions from previous tests?
Yes, it is possible to access question banks with CASPer® scenarios and questions to aid in your preparation beyond what’s available on the CASPer® website itself. The strength of third–party resources and their proximity to actual CASPer® scenarios depends highly on the specific resource and the extent to which the banks get updated each application cycle.
Unlike the MCAT, it’s not necessary to make use of extensive question banks to be successful, and these resources can be costly. If this option doesn’t work for you, that’s okay! Think about using some of the other strategies mentioned here. If you still have questions about the best method for you, you can connect with a Further Education Advisor in a drop–in to start a conversation.
Check if references are required and, if so, the number and type (academic or non-academic). Many programs require two academic references (meaning professors — although exceptions can be made for those who have been out of school for some time), while some ask for one academic and one non-academic. Examples of non-academic references are coaches, volunteer supervisors, and employers. If there are no guidelines on which type of reference is required, academic reference letters are usually highly valued, as your referee should be able to speak to your ability to be successful in a professional/graduate school.
Evaluate who can best provide a non-academic reference letter. Asking someone with a prestigious title, but who cannot provide any substance on your capabilities (with proof) will add no value to your application. Consider first what you want discussed in your reference letter and then find people who can provide that information.
Ask your potential referees in person: “Will you have time to write a strong supporting reference letter?” Then listen to how the individual responds. If you detect any hesitation, try to find someone else. Individuals could be reluctant to write a letter of reference if they have little to say that is positive about your work, or alternatively if they have little memory of you. Many referees will try to let you down easily in such cases. Providing them a way to say “no” can help ensure that you obtain only the most positive of references for your application, whereas including references from individuals who indicate that they do not know you well can be very detrimental to your application.
If your referee is unsure of what to include in the reference letter, suggest that they: include their credentials/accomplishments; provide proof about your abilities/attributes; and share what you accomplished in the course/work term (e.g., assignments, presentations, grades received), difficulty of course/work experience, and comparison of you to other successful students.
It is recommended that you cultivate relationships throughout your university experience, so that when the time comes to ask potential referees to write a letter, you have some choices. Many students worry about how to go about doing this, as they may not feel close enough to their professors to be memorable. But there are ways to tackle this challenge. Pick a professor from whom you have taken several classes, or one to whom you have submitted a particularly strong essay or project. Visit the professor during his or her office hours, or ask questions after class. Show that you are interested in the class content, and that you have a goal to attend graduate school or a professional program. You can mention through this process that in the future you hope that they might write a reference letter for you. This may help them to pay more attention to you. Start establishing these connections today.
Give referees enough time to write effective letters. Ask 4 to 6 weeks in advance for a reference letter, and provide the form, addressed envelope with postage (if necessary), your personal statement/letter of intent, a list of projects completed in their courses, admission requirements, and your résumé — anything that will help their task of writing a letter. Provide a general idea of why you want to attend that particular professional/graduate program, as well as what areas of the field interest you. Ask if your referee requires more information to write your letter.
Sometimes you will be given the option of an “open” versus a “closed” reference letter. An open letter means that you can read it prior to submission; however, it is best not to choose this option as such letters are not viewed as favourably as “closed,” and thus confidential, letters.
If you are not using a centralized application centre, referees will need to provide you with a reference letter for each program or school to which you are applying. These programs will require referees to submit references either directly to the program (electronically after you have provided their name/contact information, or by mail) or in a sealed envelope with a signature across the closing to the applicant. The application process might indicate when your references have been received, so you can use this information to follow-up and remind your referees if necessary. If you apply through a centralized application service, each referee completes only one reference form or letter, which is submitted directly to the application centre for distribution to each institution.
Admission committees look for specific examples of academic abilities as well as discipline, persistence, and responsibility. If a reference form is required, read through the different categories a referee needs to complete because this information may help you identify whom to ask to complete the form and reference letter. Always remember to send a thank-you note to your referee(s).
Transcripts need to be ordered directly from the school(s) you attended unless you are currently enrolled in, or have graduated from, an Ontario university or college and are applying through OUAC. In the latter case, submit a transcript request form to OUAC, and your transcripts will be ordered and forwarded to the institutions to which you are applying. If you are applying to a program at a school that you have already attended, you may not be required to submit a transcript.
It is always a good idea to check your unofficial transcript to ensure it is accurate. Allow enough time to order and have transcripts sent to the school to which you are applying. (At the University of Waterloo this is from the Registrar‘s Office for undergraduate transcripts and the Graduate Studies Office for graduate transcripts.) You may be asked to submit the transcript with your application package in a sealed, signed envelope. Check the admission requirements to determine if a final transcript needs to be sent after you complete your degree.
Graduate degree programs may begin in January, May, or September, and applications are generally due between December and February (for a September start date). In Ontario, applications to certain programs are made through OUAC. The online application becomes available approximately three months prior to the deadline. It usually takes between 5 to 25 to complete an application, so allow yourself enough time to do a thorough job. You do not need to complete the application in one sitting; you can enter and exit the application until you decide you are ready to submit. The following are applications available through OUAC:
If applying to professional programs outside Ontario, contact each institution to check the number of applicants accepted from out of province. Apply directly to each institution. In many cases, an online application form is used.
If your application process involves an interview, please review the Interviewing pages within this Further education section to learn more about graduate/professional school interviews.
If you receive an offer from your second-choice school, contact your first-choice school to see if you can accelerate its decision. If you receive a letter stating you are on a waiting list, determine if you can take steps to increase the likelihood of being accepted. It may be possible to provide additional reference letters and other information to show how your skills and experience have grown since your original application. If possible, visit schools and try to meet with decision makers. And, if you know a faculty member with connections to your program or institution of choice, ask him or her to speak to the admissions committee on your behalf.
Although many students strengthen their qualifications and reapply, it is important to be realistic (i.e., know when and how to develop a viable alternative that will still allow you to realize many of your goals).
If you are unsure of your interests or goals, or don‘t have a parallel plan, please review the Decision-making section of CareerHub.
The Michener Institute of Education at UHN located in Toronto offers many programs relevant to working in the health profession. Check their website for details on which programs you can apply to with one year of university, a high school diploma, or a bachelor’s degree
Note: Check specific requirements for each program at The Michener Institute of Education at UHN. For each program the candidate may be required to take an English Language Proficiency Exam such as TOFEL, or IELTS. After the completion of a program there may be an applicable exam to pass in order to have certification in the field.
Standard interview format is when candidates are asked a series of questions in front of one or more admission panelists. The main portion of the interview consists of the interviewer asking you questions to try to determine your fit. Generally, you have an opportunity to ask any questions that you may have at the end of the interview.
Practice your interview skills by signing up for the Professional School Interviews (Standard) workshop.
Behaviour-based interviews are designed to elicit information about how you have performed in the past because past behaviour is a good indicator of how you will function in the future. Interviewers develop their questions around the traits and skills they consider necessary for succeeding in a profession. Occasionally, behaviour-based questions are used in the MMI interview format as well. These questions usually begin with phrases such as:
Some applicants find the format of such questions difficult to understand and have trouble responding. However, if you have done your research and have prepared for the interview, you will have work, academic, volunteer, and life experiences ready to share. You can prepare for behaviour-based questions by recalling specific instances that demonstrate your accomplishments, abilities, and fit for the profession/field. Be certain to tell the truth, get to the point, stay focused and positive, and be consistent with your responses. Common behaviour-based interview themes include the following:
Next Step: Work through your résumé to find specific examples for each theme above. Use the STAR approach to describe each example.
The “STAR Approach” is a useful technique for answering behaviour-based questions:
Situation: Provide Background and context:
Task: Describe what you needed to do
Action: Explain what you actually did and how you did it
Result: Describe the outcome of your actions
For example, in response to the query “What experience do you have organizing projects?” you determine that the qualification being evaluated is organizational skills. Your skill/knowledge/ability statement could be, “I have developed excellent organizational skills by working on two major projects. The one I would like to tell you about ended successfully six months ago.”
Every statement you make must be true. Don’t lie or embellish. Ideally, the example you choose should be something that requires a competency similar to the typical work of the prospective professional. If you do not have a similar experience to relate, try to choose the most relevant story from your academic, extracurricular or volunteer activities — do not make it up! Describe the what, who, when, where, why, and how, and talk about the successful outcome or what you learned from the experience.
As you tell the story allow the interviewer to see or live through the action with you. Choose words that will help the interviewer visualize you in the experience (e.g., “It was five minutes before closing on the busiest night of the year when the power went out...”). Whenever possible, include positive feedback from supervisors, colleagues, professors, and others to reinforce your accomplishment. Humour, if used appropriately, can also be an effective tool, because it helps the interviewer to remember you.
The next step is the one that most candidates forget. Tell the interviewer what specific benefits or competitive advantage you can bring to the profession/field because of the experience you have just described. For example, “As part of the team being formed, I would be able to coordinate....” Avoid generic statements such as, “All professions need people with leadership ability.”
An interviewer will use situational/hypothetical questions to establish how you would react to and handle real-life situations. For situational/hypothetical questions, candidates must have a good understanding of the profession and its requirements. Here are some examples of this type of question:
When answering problem-solving questions demonstrate your ability to process information quickly, think logically, and solve creatively. Interviewers place emphasis on the thought process rather than on the conclusion. Examples of problem-solving questions include the following:
The key is not to worry about getting the “right” answer but, rather, to demonstrate your logical thought process in solving the problem. The following five-step process is appropriate for handling most problem-solving questions:
Keep in mind, there is no right answer, only your answer.
In addition to asking the other types of questions mentioned, many interviewers rely on a series of standard questions, and you should prepare for them. Occasionally, classic interview questions are used in the MMI interview format as well.
While preparation is key, it is not possible to predict and prepare for all interview questions. Instead, review your résumé, application, and research the profession (current and future state). Then put information into different categories (e.g., accomplishments, understanding of profession, unique qualities, challenges/weaknesses) enabling you to provide examples as necessary.
The “PAWS” model is a useful method for answering classic questions such as “Tell me about yourself” and “Why do you want to be a ___________?”
When an interviewer asks this question, s/he is looking for those aspects of your life that are relevant to the profession/field, such as how you became interested in the field, related experience, and courses taken. “PAWS” stands for Profile, Academic, Work, and Skills. Include all or as many of the four (in any order) to reinforce your fit for the field/profession.
Here are some examples of what to discuss in each of the four areas:
Profile: Mention how you became interested in this field and point out any relevant community involvement, extracurricular activities, memberships, and personal interests that further demonstrate your commitment to the field
Academic: Talk about your educational background (degrees/diplomas/certifications) and other related training and professional development initiatives/courses that you have participated in
Work: Highlight paid or unpaid (volunteer) experiences related to the profession
Skills: Refer to specific skills/competencies that relate to the profession or field (e.g., communication, interpersonal, time management, problem-solving skills)
Please read Delivering bad news stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews.
Please read Ethical scenario stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews
To supplement the information you obtained before the interview, you should ask questions during the interview (although you will not have this opportunity with MMI interviews). Some questions will arise naturally during the interview, but it is wise to prepare a number of questions in advance. Asking questions will demonstrate your interest and help you determine if the program/school fits your personality, skills, interests, and values.
Your questions should pertain to the program/school and show your enthusiasm and knowledge. By asking intelligent, well-thought-out questions that genuinely matter to you, you will convince the interviewer that you are serious about the program and institution. If a question has been answered during the interview, do not ask it again; such repetition will suggest that you were not listening. It is important to compose your own questions; however, the following may give you a starting point:
Chiropractic, naturopathic medicine, osteopathic medicine, physician assistant, and veterinary medicine programs also have an interview process. Typically, the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College and the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine have standard panel formats. Osteopathic medicine schools in the United States, the physician assistant programs at McMaster University and the University of Toronto, and the Ontario Veterinary College at the University of Guelph hold MMI interviews. Health-related programs at the Michener Institute in Toronto host MMI interviews as well, and regardless of the program applied to at the Michener Institute, candidates move through the same stations.
Information on interview process and format often changes. The most up-to-date information for each school can be found on each program’s individual website.
An applicant interacts with an actor, and there is an observer in the room.
For example, “You are roommates with Alex. She hasn’t done her share of dishes in the last month and leaves her belongings all over the apartment. Her room is starting to smell from the leftover food/dishes she leaves out. Enter the room and discuss this situation with her.”
There is no right or wrong answer when you are answering a critical thinking question. Many of these questions contain an ethical component, and the idea is to minimize the negative outcome for anyone involved in the ethical dilemma presented to you. Be consistent in your response even if the interviewer tries to sway your opinion by adding new information partway through your answer. On the other hand, if the new information has a great impact one way or the other, clearly state your justification for changing your opinion. For health-related admission interviews, answers should always be patient-focused. Health care is about objectivity, best health care, and best outcomes from a medical standpoint, not what a person can contribute to society.
Identify the issues in the question, make sure you understand exactly what is being asked, and address the issue(s) raised. Endeavour to provide unbiased and neutral solutions. Rather than start with the outcome you best subscribe to, lead the interviewer to the conclusion with your evidence-based reasoning. Wherever possible, try to back up your claims with proof (e.g., items in the news, journal articles, and other research from valid and verifiable sources).
One approach to ethical questions is to use the PESTLE model (Orfano, 2011). PESTLE stands for:
Choose three to four of these perspectives and evaluate the situation. Avoid having your argument seem one sided. Ensure that you are evaluating both pros and cons for the different PESTLE perspectives. In addition, know regulations and your own ethical considerations — what is the scope of your authority and extent of your obligation?
If you are unprepared to answer the question, ask the interviewer to clarify the question and/or to provide some probing or leading questions. If that is not possible, attempt to address the part(s) of the question for which you have some knowledge. Responses to ethical questions can be fairly long. Towards the end of your response, use phrases such as “in conclusion” or “in summary” or “as a final recommendation” or “given the above, I believe” to indicate that you are concluding your response.
For example, “In some countries there is presumed consent for organ donation (it is assumed that you wish to donate your viable organs unless you opt out). Canada has the opposite system where you must sign up to be an organ donor. Do you think we should have presumed consent in Canada? Discuss this issue with the interviewer.”
When possible, show empathy and compassion when working through the PESTLE model (or another model of choice):
With the PESTLE model: Focus on three to four perspectives and have pros/cons for each.
In most cases pros/cons should be patient-centered, student-centered, client-centered, etc. Also show who else will be affected by the situation, don’t just focus on the people listed in the situation (if the situation is about a child think about how it will affect their parent(s), siblings, teachers, school, educational system, etc.).
P: Political pros/cons: government interventions/taxes/policies can influence health & education
E: Economic pros/cons: save/spend time and money
S: Social pros/cons: cultural aspects, health consciousness, population growth, age distribution, career attributes
T: Technological pros/cons: R&D activity, automation, changes and innovation
L: Legal pros/cons: legal implications
E: Ethical pros/cons: ethical dilemmas OR Environmental pros/cons: weather, climate change, tourism, farming
Other models to address ethical questions are ABCDE of Medical Ethics (Levine, 1994) and CARVE (Gampel):
Transcript: Critical thinking station: PESTLE feedback (DOCX)
Transcript: Critical thinking station: people perspective (DOCX)
Transcript: Critical thinking station: people perspective feedback (DOCX)
Two candidates work together to complete a task, and one or two observers are present. One applicant will deliver instructions/explain (generally referred to as the leader) and the other applicant (generally referred to as the follower) will complete a task (e.g., puzzle building, drawing). The process is repeated at another station and the roles are reversed. You may or not be with the same candidate. Typically, you are placed back to back with your partner so you cannot see each other.
A common scenario is: “Guide your partner to complete this puzzle. At the end of the station you will be given time to provide feedback to each other”.
Generally there are two candidates at this station and two observers. Each candidate is presented with a side to argue. Typically, after three to five minutes of discussion, you will need to verbally evaluate yourself and the other candidate.
For example, “Candidate 1 believes that the Olympics are a waste of money; candidate 2 disagrees. Defend your position to the other candidate.”
When you enter a health-related profession, generally you will be taught how to deliver bad news to a patient. While it is not expected that you know how to do this in your admissions interview, often you will be asked about this to get a sense of your empathy and compassion. For example, “How would you tell a 65-year-old woman she has cancer?” Sometimes this scenario is used with an MMI acting/role play station. A tip for delivering bad news is to keep your facial expressions neutral. As a health care professional, you want to be careful about displaying emotion when delivering bad news. This format is taught in medical school and may be helpful:
SPIKES was developed by Robert Buckman, MD, Associate Professor of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto and modified from the original version (Sandrick, K.1998).
Sometimes candidates are asked how they would react to a scenario that involves an ethical component such as witnessing cheating/stealing, or other unethical behaviours. How you respond/react to these situations indicates how you will act in your profession.
Consider both your ethical actions and the interpersonal situation.
For example, “You see your coworker carrying work equipment to their personal car. How do you handle the situation?”
These stations are used to test future MMI stations, although they will not be identified as such.
These stations are used to test future MMI stations, although they will not be identified as such.
These stations are used to test future MMI stations, although they will not be identified as such.
In this type of station, candidates are allowed to rest and sometimes offered water or can talk to a current student.
Students have said that the break station throws them off during the actual MMI. Do not take the time to rehash all of the previous stations, or work yourself up over what questions could be next. Take a break from talking if that is what you need and try to breathe and relax. If there is a current student at the rest station to speak to, be polite and interact with them. Use the conversation to help calm your nerves/get your mind off of waiting.
In this type of station, candidates are allowed to rest and sometimes offered water or can talk to a current student.
Students have said that the break station throws them off during the actual MMI. Do not take the time to rehash all of the previous stations, or work yourself up over what questions could be next. Take a break from talking if that is what you need and try to breathe and relax. If there is a current student at the rest station to speak to, be polite and interact with them. Use the conversation to help calm your nerves/get your mind off of waiting.
Sometimes, even MMI interviews have one or two stations that ask standard/panel interview questions. Please read the Standard professional school interviews questions and recommended models for more information. Common standard questions for health professions generally include: “Why do you want to be a _________?” “Tell me about a time when you did __________”. “What do you know about the profession?”
In many stations it is important to demonstrate your knowledge of the current trends, policies, challenges, and changing roles of health care practitioners. Keep up to date with the governing body for your future profession, and make sure to watch/read the news as much as possible to be aware of current events. Some of these questions can include sensitive topics like physician-assisted suicide, stem cell research, abortion, aboriginal and alternative medicine, access to care in rural populations, as well as school specific teaching methods or curriculum
For example, “What is the biggest challenge currently facing the profession of _________?” or “If the Prime Minister of Canada asked you to recommend one change to our health care system that would make the biggest impact, what would you recommend?”
In this station, candidates review a short video and then write answers to (generally) standard ethical, situational, and behaviour-based questions.
Applicants are ranked at each station by the interviewer or observer. Interviewers do not discuss their rankings with other interviewers, so you are independently rated by each interviewer which eliminates bias.
The evaluation criterion varies each year. The interviewer is provided with a list of criteria that the school is looking for in a candidate. Depending on the school you might be given marks for: demeanor, maturity, intellect, compassion, overall impression, communication, English fluency, ability to organize, integrity in ethics, critical-thinking skills, soft skills identified in the question, incorporating personal examples. You will be rewarded for being methodical and articulate. Interviewers want to see how you process information. You can read McMaster’s Manual for Interviewers online to see an example evaluation form.
Prefer to learn in person? Attend the MMI Simulation workshop to practice answering questions and improve your skills.
Gampel, E. H. A Framework for Moral Reasoning. Retrieved from http://www.csuchico.edu/~egampel/students/solving2.htm
Levine, D. (1994). Physician-patient Communication in the Urban Clinical Setting. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359272/pdf/bullnyacadmed01039-0058.pdf
Orfano, F. (2011). Components of a PESTLE Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.brighthub.com/office/project-management/articles/51754.html
Sandrick, K. (1998). Codified principles enhance physician/patient communication. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, 83(11), 13-17.
The interview is an exchange of information between you and the interviewer(s). It is used to help assess interest in, and suitability (i.e., competencies) for the program of study, and fit for the field/profession. To make this assessment, the interview committee will endeavour to obtain information about your skills, values (personal ethics), personality, and interests. Interviewers may be interested in your integrity (personal and professional accountability), maturity, compassion, sincerity, honesty, originality, curiosity, intelligence, confidence, motivation, leadership skills, communication skills, ability to relate to others, cultural and social interests, work and volunteer experiences, knowledge of relevant issues and events, and, in some cases, your ability to withstand the emotional/physical demands of the profession.
Succeeding in an interview may depend on your professional appearance and the interviewer’s first impression of you. If the first impression is not positive, it will be difficult to change the interviewer’s mind during the rest of the interview.
Arrive early, dressed in attire appropriate for the type of admissions interview you are attending. For health and business-related interviews dress conservatively and keep fashion accessories to a minimum. Avoid wearing strong scents (or any at all) because many people have environmental allergies. Ensure your cell phone is turned off.
Greet each person with respect and professionalism. When you shake hands, make eye contact and smile. Handshakes should be firm but not aggressive; try to match the grip of the interviewer. Standard North American practice is to shake hands at the beginning and end of an interview. However, if you are not comfortable with this practice tell the interviewer that you prefer not to shake hands and why. It is good etiquette to wait to sit down until the interviewer invites you to do so.
Don’t worry about being a little nervous during the interview; being nervous is normal and expected. Remember, the interviewer wants you to have the right qualifications and interest in the profession. Many interviewers will begin the interview with some “small talk” to help you relax. This may seem irrelevant to the program, but you are still being evaluated; be sure to demonstrate a positive attitude.
To demonstrate effectively your suitability and value, you must know yourself. Review your self-assessment information, volunteer experiences, application, personal statement/letter of intent, and your résumé. Be prepared to give examples to substantiate all claims. Some interviewers will want you to talk about your mistakes and what lessons you learned from them. Ensure that your responses are sufficiently detailed. This is especially important in “closed” or “blind” interviews where committee members may not have been privy to your complete application.
Review professional and regulatory bodies’ websites to be familiar with the current profession, future directions, and the competencies important for someone in the field. It is important to demonstrate your genuine interest in and fit for the profession. Read the notes you made as you reviewed print and online materials, during volunteer opportunities/job shadowing, and when you talked with others. Keep current with events and new research. Many of the MMI stations will be relevant to current topics in the news, both health- and non-health related. The best way to gather this information is to follow the news, review association websites, and to speak with professionals in the field. Your interpersonal skills will be a particularly important factor in people-focused professions as you will be required to be approachable and to work closely with patients/students/clients.
To prepare for the interview, ensure that you research the faculty/program and, if appropriate, the interviewers’ areas of expertise in order to understand the nuances of each. If possible, visit the campus and talk to current students in the program, attend classes, and visit labs.
The order in which you deliver the content of your answer indicates your priorities. For example if your answer to: “Why do you want to be a doctor?” is “... to help patients, conduct research, teach” this will create a more positive impression than “... a high income, prestige, to help patients.”
Awkward situations may occur during an interview, and it is up to you to be prepared to confidently handle whatever happens. To increase your confidence and preparation for an interview, practise. Check for quality of information in your answers and the positive, non-verbal reinforcement of your words. By practising responses out loud, you can hear your answers and assess their effectiveness. But don’t practise so much that you lose your spontaneity and your answers sound rehearsed.
The key to tricky situations is to remember that barriers to admission can often be overcome by focusing on the positive. Circumstances that you may find problematic are:
If you answer a question and there is no prompt response or follow-up question, try to remain calm and collected. Silence may not be a negative sign; the interviewer could be taking time to process and record your answer, and/or be considering the next question.
In response to uncomfortable silence, ask the interviewers if they require any further details regarding your last response, shifting the responsibility to them. Resist the temptation to ramble because you may provide irrelevant information that may hurt your chances of being offered admission.
Although the interviewer will likely take notes, generally you should not. If you have your head down writing, the conversation will be uncomfortable and unengaging because of your lack of eye contact and inability to show enthusiasm.
Making brief notes is acceptable when you need to record information that may be easily forgotten, such as a key word, phone number, or contact information. If you fear you may not recall other pertinent details, document the information immediately after the interview.
You may have difficulty communicating your thoughts clearly and concisely, especially when you are not sure how to respond to a question. The key is to remain calm and positive, focus on the question, and continue to remind yourself that you are doing well. You may request clarification if you are not sure what the interviewer is asking, or pause and politely ask for a few moments to consider your response; however, don’t take too much time because interviewers want to see that you can think well under pressure.
After a brief pause, if you still cannot respond to the interviewer’s question, you may ask to defer your answer to the end of the interview. The risk is that interviews usually follow a certain structure and the question might be missed entirely, leaving the interviewer with an unanswered question. If you’re stumped because you simply do not know the answer, be honest with the interviewer and, depending on the type of question, discuss how you would handle the situation or resources you would use to find the answer.
Interviewers will often ask negatively phrased questions to assess your perceived weaknesses and strengths. The following are a few examples:
Be honest and discuss a real weakness or past event that would not negatively impact performance for the profession/field you are applying for. Avoid the popular advice to turn a weakness into a strength (e.g., “I’m a perfectionist...”) because this kind of response is unconvincing and over used. Be sure to end your “weakness” response on a positive note by indicating what steps you are taking to overcome the weakness.
It is important to keep your answers short and to be as positive as possible, even when answering a negatively framed question.
It is a pleasure to be interviewed by someone who is enthusiastic about the profession, but it is not desirable if you aren’t able to market yourself because the interviewer monopolizes the discussion. Tactfully break into the conversation to help keep the interview focused on the subject you know best: you! You might say, “I had a similar experience...” or “It’s interesting that you say that because I am also skilled in...”
Is your body or verbal language contributing to the problem? Without being rude, offer less acknowledgement (e.g., nodding, “that’s interesting,” “really?”). If you are not given adequate time to market your qualifications and the interview is drawing to a close, request a few moments to summarize your qualifications for the profession/field, highlighting key points you had planned to discuss.
What should you do if you’re in the middle of an interview and have just been asked what is clearly an illegal question? There is no clear-cut answer. Much depends on you.
In some cases, you may be able to answer the “hidden” question. Think of what information the interviewer is trying to elicit. For example, “Do you have or plan to have children?” may indicate a concern about your ability to put in the time to complete the program.
You may elect to say “Why do you ask?” or “Would you explain how this point is connected to the qualifications for this program?” This could cause the interviewer to reconsider or clarify the question. It may offend some interviewers, but probably not the majority.
If you feel that you should not answer the question (you shouldn’t have to, after all) or that you are not interested in attending the program, you may state, “I don’t feel obligated to answer that” or “That question is inappropriate.” If you choose this option, you will either enlighten (the interviewer may not realize it is illegal and will be happy that you pointed it out), or offend (the interviewer may not consider you for the program). At some schools there is a post-interview evaluation, so a candidate can report illegal questions.
It is best not to bring up your religious beliefs in your answers. Interviewers for health-related professions could worry that when you are practising in your profession, and not being supervised, you might present different religious options to a patient and this isn’t the expected practice. As a health-care provider you need to look at things objectively and not present your own ideologies.
Smile when appropriate during the interview. Be enthusiastic and responsive. As you talk about your past and present activities, your passion and energy can be communicated both through your words and your body language (e.g., an excited tone of voice, leaning forward, nodding your head in agreement). Maintaining eye contact is important; failure to do so may imply a lack of confidence or, worse, cause the interviewer to question your truthfulness.
Sit comfortably, without slouching. Don’t put anything on your lap or in your hands if it will restrict your natural body movement or if you may be tempted to play with it. Keep your clipboard, note pad, briefcase, or portfolio on the floor beside your chair for easy retrieval.
Respond to questions specifically and concisely but give sufficient details to enable the interviewer to evaluate your credentials. Interviewers become frustrated when they have to listen to long, rambling answers. Think before you speak. It is quite acceptable to pause before talking in order to organize your thoughts. Avoid verbal fillers such as “um,” “ah,” “you know,” or regularly repeating the question to provide thinking time.
Use professional language. Avoid slang. Speak clearly. Watch the interviewer for clues on how the interview is progressing. Is the interviewer’s face or body language telling you that your answers are too long, not detailed enough, too boring? If in doubt, ask the interviewer if more or fewer details are needed.
Prepare in advance to talk about any topic that you feel uncomfortable about. If there is something that you don’t want an interviewer to inquire about, it will likely be raised during the interview. Practise your answer out loud often enough to feel confident, and to decrease your emotions surrounding the answer (e.g., “Tell me about your most painful experience”). Maintain poise and self-control. Consider a difficult issue as a learning opportunity that has made you a better person.
This is an interview where one interviewer conducts an interview with one candidate. This is typical for MBA and graduate school interviews.
For health-related interviews it is common for there to be a panel of interviewers. Often this consists of a faculty member or someone in the profession, a current student, and a community member. Each interviewer will be assessing you differently (e.g., a community member will assess if they would choose you as a professional).
Although it is important to have good eye contact with the person who asks you a question, also look at the other interviewers frequently to include them in the discussion. Try to remember each person’s name and use his or her name during the interview.
The interview process often includes meeting with current students and a tour of the site, so wear comfortable shoes.
If given the choice between an on- or off-campus interview (common for MBA), try to arrange an on-campus interview. This will give you the opportunity to talk to current students, sit in on a class, see the campus, and get a better sense whether this is the right school and location for you. However, if you are not able to attend an on-campus interview, you will not be penalized.
All of the usual advice about interview skills still applies. Your attire is your choice, but you may find that dressing professionally increases your confidence and allows you to perform better. Keep your application, school information, points that you want to highlight, and list of questions handy; in fact, keep these in front of you during the interview for easy reference. (Don’t shuffle your papers though!) Have a pen and paper available to note any comments or questions that may occur to you during the interview. Choose your words carefully and be succinct. It is also important to vary your voice tone, tempo, and pitch to keep the interviewer’s attention. Ensure that you are in a private setting to eliminate any distractions or background noise.
In this type of interview, interviewers use video technology to conduct interviews at a distance. Use the same strategies as you would if you were meeting in person. Depending on the sophistication of the technology, you may experience short transmission delays. Make eye contact with the camera, which, to the interviewer, appears as direct “eye contact.” Remember to check the monitor periodically to observe the interviewer’s body language.
After each interview, evaluate how well you did by completing the following “Interview evaluation worksheet”
Save this list to record how you perform during interviews and to document your progress.
Standard interview format is when candidates are asked a series of questions in front of one or more admission panelists. The main portion of the interview consists of the interviewer asking you questions to try to determine your fit. Generally, you have an opportunity to ask any questions that you may have at the end of the interview.
Practice your interview skills by signing up for the Professional School Interviews (Standard) workshop.
Behaviour-based interviews are designed to elicit information about how you have performed in the past because past behaviour is a good indicator of how you will function in the future. Interviewers develop their questions around the traits and skills they consider necessary for succeeding in a profession. Occasionally, behaviour-based questions are used in the MMI interview format as well. These questions usually begin with phrases such as:
Some applicants find the format of such questions difficult to understand and have trouble responding. However, if you have done your research and have prepared for the interview, you will have work, academic, volunteer, and life experiences ready to share. You can prepare for behaviour-based questions by recalling specific instances that demonstrate your accomplishments, abilities, and fit for the profession/field. Be certain to tell the truth, get to the point, stay focused and positive, and be consistent with your responses. Common behaviour-based interview themes include the following:
Next Step: Work through your résumé to find specific examples for each theme above. Use the STAR approach to describe each example.
The “STAR Approach” is a useful technique for answering behaviour-based questions:
Situation: Provide Background and context:
Task: Describe what you needed to do
Action: Explain what you actually did and how you did it
Result: Describe the outcome of your actions
For example, in response to the query “What experience do you have organizing projects?” you determine that the qualification being evaluated is organizational skills. Your skill/knowledge/ability statement could be, “I have developed excellent organizational skills by working on two major projects. The one I would like to tell you about ended successfully six months ago.”
Every statement you make must be true. Don’t lie or embellish. Ideally, the example you choose should be something that requires a competency similar to the typical work of the prospective professional. If you do not have a similar experience to relate, try to choose the most relevant story from your academic, extracurricular or volunteer activities — do not make it up! Describe the what, who, when, where, why, and how, and talk about the successful outcome or what you learned from the experience.
As you tell the story allow the interviewer to see or live through the action with you. Choose words that will help the interviewer visualize you in the experience (e.g., “It was five minutes before closing on the busiest night of the year when the power went out...”). Whenever possible, include positive feedback from supervisors, colleagues, professors, and others to reinforce your accomplishment. Humour, if used appropriately, can also be an effective tool, because it helps the interviewer to remember you.
The next step is the one that most candidates forget. Tell the interviewer what specific benefits or competitive advantage you can bring to the profession/field because of the experience you have just described. For example, “As part of the team being formed, I would be able to coordinate....” Avoid generic statements such as, “All professions need people with leadership ability.”
An interviewer will use situational/hypothetical questions to establish how you would react to and handle real-life situations. For situational/hypothetical questions, candidates must have a good understanding of the profession and its requirements. Here are some examples of this type of question:
When answering problem-solving questions demonstrate your ability to process information quickly, think logically, and solve creatively. Interviewers place emphasis on the thought process rather than on the conclusion. Examples of problem-solving questions include the following:
The key is not to worry about getting the “right” answer but, rather, to demonstrate your logical thought process in solving the problem. The following five-step process is appropriate for handling most problem-solving questions:
Keep in mind, there is no right answer, only your answer.
In addition to asking the other types of questions mentioned, many interviewers rely on a series of standard questions, and you should prepare for them. Occasionally, classic interview questions are used in the MMI interview format as well.
While preparation is key, it is not possible to predict and prepare for all interview questions. Instead, review your résumé, application, and research the profession (current and future state). Then put information into different categories (e.g., accomplishments, understanding of profession, unique qualities, challenges/weaknesses) enabling you to provide examples as necessary.
The “PAWS” model is a useful method for answering classic questions such as “Tell me about yourself” and “Why do you want to be a ___________?”
When an interviewer asks this question, s/he is looking for those aspects of your life that are relevant to the profession/field, such as how you became interested in the field, related experience, and courses taken. “PAWS” stands for Profile, Academic, Work, and Skills. Include all or as many of the four (in any order) to reinforce your fit for the field/profession.
Here are some examples of what to discuss in each of the four areas:
Profile: Mention how you became interested in this field and point out any relevant community involvement, extracurricular activities, memberships, and personal interests that further demonstrate your commitment to the field
Academic: Talk about your educational background (degrees/diplomas/certifications) and other related training and professional development initiatives/courses that you have participated in
Work: Highlight paid or unpaid (volunteer) experiences related to the profession
Skills: Refer to specific skills/competencies that relate to the profession or field (e.g., communication, interpersonal, time management, problem-solving skills)
Please read Delivering bad news stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews.
Please read Ethical scenario stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews
To supplement the information you obtained before the interview, you should ask questions during the interview (although you will not have this opportunity with MMI interviews). Some questions will arise naturally during the interview, but it is wise to prepare a number of questions in advance. Asking questions will demonstrate your interest and help you determine if the program/school fits your personality, skills, interests, and values.
Your questions should pertain to the program/school and show your enthusiasm and knowledge. By asking intelligent, well-thought-out questions that genuinely matter to you, you will convince the interviewer that you are serious about the program and institution. If a question has been answered during the interview, do not ask it again; such repetition will suggest that you were not listening. It is important to compose your own questions; however, the following may give you a starting point:
You have several options when pursuing your formal education goals: graduate programs in academic subjects (e.g., Master’s or Ph.D programs); professional programs (e.g., law school, medical school, dental school); post-diploma and professional programs at colleges that generally require a Bachelor’s degree to qualify for application and can sometimes exist as a joint program with a university; or other educational opportunities (e.g., courses offered through the Human Resources Professionals Association of Ontario or the Canadian Securities Institute).
Now that you have decided to enrol in a graduate or professional program, the first step is to choose the program that will best meet your needs. Talk to professors, admissions staff, graduate students, and alumni to help you determine which program to enter. Ask about each school’s reputation in the field. Contact the department or faculty of the school you want to attend to get further information; administrators may start a file based on this initial contact. Finally, a campus visit can go a long way towards helping you make an informed decision.
It may be helpful to find a professor who shares your interests and who will act as a mentor. This professor may be willing to help you identify the programs that are best suited to your interests and assist you in the selection and application processes. Also consider contacting the graduate student associations at your universities of interest as well as relevant professional associations: they may provide you with first-hand, up-to-date insights into programs.
As a Health Studies co-op student, Rachel McDonald spent five co-op work terms at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. She coordinated the rapid response radiotherapy program, which provides palliative radiation treatment to advanced cancer patients. Over five co-op terms, Rachel collected, analyzed and published data as the lead author on seven papers in peer-reviewed journals. She was even flown to Miami and Copenhagen to present research on quality of life and bone metastases.
Rachel was accepted into two of Canada’s most prestigious medical schools: Queens University and University of Toronto. Now, she is in her second year of medical school at the University of Toronto.
I think a lot of people underestimate the power of co-op. Work hard, be diligent and take initiative to do things outside of just what the position entails.
Rachel McDonald, co-op stream
Honours Science student Colin Whaley appreciated the consistency of the regular stream of study, which allowed him to tailor his classes and extracurriculars during his fall/winter study terms. In just five years, Colin was able to complete three honours thesis courses (biology, health and kinesiology), work as a Teaching Assistant and publish two papers. He also volunteered with campus clubs and services like the Campus Response Team and MATES Peer Counselling Group and even co-founded his own club that has sent around 100 volunteers to deliver technology training to seniors in long-term care homes and hospitals.
After working as a researcher at the Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre and completing the graduate program at the University of Waterloo’s School of Pharmacy, Colin was accepted to a number of Canadian medical schools. He will now be attending Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster University.
Get involved, build relationships and maintain an open mind towards different fields of research and practice. This can take you down some really interesting paths.
Colin Whaley, regular stream
It is important that you understand how your grades will be calculated, as each graduate and professional school has different rules and methods of evaluation.
They might look at one (or some) of the following factors:
If you are in co-op, your co-op sequence could affect the way your grades are calculated when applying to professional schools as some programs expect you to complete two study terms per academic year (typically from September-August) in order to count as a year of study or towards the grades in your GPA.
Graduate school grade calculations are not typically impacted by your co-op sequence.
Depending on where you will be applying, the application and start timelines, document conventions, and program structure may be different. It is important to research the conventions in the location you are applying to.
If you are applying outside of Canada you will need to meet immigration requirements in the country you will be living in. Immigration requirements vary widely; you will need to research them thoroughly as part of your planning. You may also need to show proof that you can pay tuition when you enter the country where you will study.
Depending on your immigration status in the country where you will study, you may be considered an international student. International students often pay higher tuition. Some programs in the United States give special status to Canadian applicants.
Some institutions have rolling admissions, which means applications are accepted at any time or before the advertised deadline. Admissions committees will review a complete file and make offers and funding decisions based on an applicant’s file. Applying early to a program can help you secure a spot before more competitive applications are received.
Some programs have several admission categories (e.g., regular, mature, special consideration, access). The Grade Point Average (GPA) requirement and admission test scores may vary based on competition from individuals in a particular applicant pool. It is not detrimental to apply to a category other than “regular.” Showing that you maintained a good GPA while dealing with special circumstances can work to your advantage.
Ascertain which of the following are required:
Identify what types and levels of previous education are required. For some professional programs, a completed undergraduate degree is not required. When applying to a graduate program, you usually need a degree in the same area, but not in every case.
If you are considering completing a graduate degree to boost your GPA to enter a professional program, be aware that most will not consider your graduate GPA. Most professional programs only consider your undergrad GPA.
Generally, no extra consideration is given if you are currently, or have been, a student at the university to which you are applying.
Some programs require certain prerequisites to assess whether an applicant is ready to successfully complete a program. Often prerequisite courses need to meet a GPA cutoff. Prerequisites can change, so keep up to date on each program’s requirements.
Check with the admission’s office about necessary prerequisites if the information is not clear on their website: you can send a course description (including the URL) and course syllabus for the course(s) you determine meets the prerequisite requirements. The more information provided to an admissions office, hopefully, the faster the response time. Try to obtain written confirmation from the admissions office, as a paper trail will provide proof that the courses you have completed meet the school’s requirements. There are many programs that will not evaluate prerequisites until you have completed and paid for the application. Some institutions provide a list of courses accepted from other universities.
Some programs allow you to complete prerequisites as late as the term prior to the program start date, while others do not. Always verify the latest date of graduation (or prerequisite completion) accepted.
Please note that staff in the Centre for Career Development cannot advise you about whether courses meet a program’s prerequisites.
Admission requirements usually state the minimum GPA required to be admitted to a program. If this is not clear, contact the school to find out the GPA requirement and how it is computed. Different possibilities might include: a cumulative average, your grades for the last two years, your grades in your major, the last year of study, or marks in courses related to the program, and so on. The minimum requirement varies by program and a competitive GPA is typically higher than the minimum. The minimum GPA for a Master’s program is usually 75%. If you have a lower GPA in your last or last one or two years of study, this will be a red flag for admissions officers, as it can be interpreted to indicate either that you will not be successful in a graduate program, or that you have not grasped the core concepts required for a graduate/professional program.
The required GPA for professional programs tends to be in the low 80’s. If applying while completing a 4-year degree, most programs only consider 4A term marks and earlier, or in some cases 3B marks and earlier.
Institutions use either a 10-point or a 4-point scale, so it is important to ask how your average will be converted. Visit the program website to see if GPAs are posted for previous years. If you are applying to faculties of law, medicine, or rehab sciences in Ontario, the Ontario Universities’ Application Centre (OUAC) has GPA conversion charts published for each type of program.
For an international or exchange term, the program may need a World Education Service (WES) conversion of your grades. Allow enough time for grade conversion through WES or to order and send transcripts by the deadline date.
When applying to any graduate or professional program, check if an admission test is required and what the deadline is for score submission. If an admission test score is required, be aware that stellar results can often balance out a mediocre GPA, and that, conversely, the opposite is also true.
Some programs accept test scores after the application deadline. In most cases, test results are available four to six weeks after the test date. If you are applying to a program with rolling admissions, a complete application package (including test scores) is required before your application can be evaluated.
Prepare thoroughly for the test you need to write; plan to write it just once. At the same time, though, it is advisable that you write an admission test early enough that you could rewrite it if necessary. Determine how recent your score must be for any given application, plus how multiple scores are handled (e.g., do they consider the highest score, or do they take an average of all scores achieved?). Do not write an admission test the first time without preparing just to “try it out,” as admission committees sometimes have access to score cancellations. Note that there is a waiting period for retaking admission tests and that they can often only be retaken a limited number of times.
Allow enough time to register for the test, order study materials, study, and, if desired, attend a preparation course. Some University of Waterloo clubs on campus hold practice tests, so check their websites for information. The Centre for Career Development has practice test books that you can borrow. A link to admission test information is available on the Centre for Career Development website. Some admission tests are written at a computer-based testing centre. On the test date, you may be required to provide a list of schools that you are applying to.
Here is a list of admission tests:
The Graduate Records Examination (GRE) may be required for application to graduate schools. There is a GRE general test and a GRE subject test, but not all schools require both test results. The GRE general test is written at a computer-based testing site and has several sections: verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, and analytical writing. Contact the programs to which you are applying to determine if they use the results from every section. Doing so may help you to decide if you need to rewrite the test if your test results were low in certain sections.
The GRE subject test is a paper-based test written at testing sites across Canada. The test can be taken as often as it is offered (i.e., April, October, and November). If your scores are good, it may be to your advantage to submit them to all schools, even to those that do not require them.
The GRE is generally not required by Canadian programs if your undergraduate education was completed in Canada or the United States, but it is almost always required for graduate programs in the United States.
Only you can decide if you want to take an admission-test preparation course. Be sure to do your research to determine the value of such preparation. It is recommended that you check whether: the course fits your learning style; the course is offered online or in-person; the course is available weekends or evenings; the instructor’s experience teaching the course materials is substantial; the course covers topic content, strategies, practice tests, or too much of any one of these; the duration of the course is manageable. A longer course is not necessarily better; some companies include the amount of time spent on practice tests in their total time calculations. It is useful to use previously administered tests as a preparation tool. These are often available through the test registration site. If possible, complete practice tests in the format in which you will have to write: paper or computer-based. Each company has different teaching strategies and it can be confusing to use multiple sources of information. Some companies provide University of Waterloo students discounts; for details, visit the list of preparation courses on the Centre for Career Development’s website.
Some programs have language proficiency requirements. If your native language is English OR you have completed the four full years of your undergraduate degree at an English speaking institution, a test is generally not required. Some programs may waive the admission test scores if you can provide proof of proficiency from other sources such as courses, but if they recommend you take it — do it!
You may need to take the International English Language Testing System (IELTS); the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL); Test of Written English (TWE); or Test of English as a Foreign Language, Test of Spoken English (TOEFL TSE).
Ascertain if any type of experience is necessary to a successful application (i.e., volunteer, extra-curricular, or work). If so, consider which type(s) are required and what would be the most relevant experiences within each type (e.g., work experience is mandatory when applying to most MBA programs). If you are applying to a graduate program, research experience can be a plus. If you are applying to a health-related professional program, in most cases experience from within the profession is necessary. Use experiences from work, volunteering, extra-curricular activities, memberships in clubs/teams, and shadowing to show the depth of your understanding about the profession you want to enter in your application.
Well-rounded students who show leadership qualities, relate well to others, and possess organizational skills have an edge in the application process. In fact, according to Scholarships Canada, involvement in extra-curricular activities can greatly increase your chances of receiving a scholarship. However, admission committees also recognize that over-involvement in such activities can adversely affect your GPA, so be sure to engage only in the number of activities that you can effectively manage.
Professional Associations and Clubs (Applied Health Sciences Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Arts Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Engineering Faculty) (PDF)
Professional Associations and Clubs (Environment Faculty) (PDF)
Even though many students apply to research-based Master’s programs without any research experience, having it can provide a competitive advantage. It is highly recommended that if you apply for a direct entry Ph.D program that you do get prior research experience. Start thinking about what interests you, and try to gain experience in this area. This will help you find a program and potential supervisor. The University of Waterloo library site has an extensive list of research databases to view journal articles and find what fascinates you.
To gain research experiences seek out opportunities such as the NSERC Undergraduate Research Awards (USRA) positions. Applications for an NSERC USRA are very competitive. Some departments offer University Research Assistantships that could provide research experience.
Securing an Undergraduate Research Internship (URI) would allow you to hold a research position with a professor; these opportunities are managed by Co-operative and Experiential Education and the program is open to regular and co-op students. Be proactive and approach a professor, tell them about the program, and provide the URL so they can complete the application.
Another option is to volunteer in a lab on campus where permitted. You could run experiments or even conduct basic literature reviews for professors or grad students. Approach faculty members and explain how your skills and background will be an asset to their research. Consider the faculty member’s perspective and do not focus just on what you will get out of the experience.
Often your fourth year design project or final thesis course and paper will provide research exposure. If you are in a co-op program, you can look for research-based work terms at Waterloo, other institutions, or in industry.
Seek to publish your work whenever possible. It will be especially important if applying to a Ph.D program — giving you a competitive edge. You do not have to be the first author. Take any opportunity to contribute to a study, write up a journal article, or participate in a conference presentation/abstract.
Talk to a faculty member to find out how you could turn your senior-year course project into a publication.
What is CASPer®?
CASPer® (Computer–based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics) is an admissions test that assesses interpersonal and non–cognitive skills like communication, collaboration, interpersonal, ethical–decision making, empathy, compassion, integrity, etc. through a scenario–based format. The scenarios are largely ethical in nature and the questions asked gauge your personal attributes and characteristics using concrete examples of real–world situations.
CASPer® is not a knowledge–based test.
Who uses CASPer®?
CASPer® is increasingly being used by many professional programs, and is common health–related programs such as medicine, nursing, optometry, pharmacy, and more. Programs can add CASPer® to their list of requirements for any application cycle, so check the information for the year of your application cycle.
How do I find out if I need CASPer®?
There are two ways to find out if you need to take CASPer® for your application(s):
What is the CASPer® testing process like?
CASPer® is a computer–based online test, meaning you can take this test in any environment with a reliable internet connection and minimal distractions. The test is 90 minutes in length and is comprised of 10–12 sections. Each section will present a video or written scenario. You can only watch the video or read the written passage once per scenario. Following each scenario, applicants are required to type out an answer three questions in five minutes. Each response is graded by a different marker, so 10–12 people mark your CASPer® test.
Very few schools are explicit about the possible ways that CASPer® scores are used in their admission decisions.
How many times do I need to take the test?
You will need to take the test at least once for every year you apply, as your test scores are only valid for one year.
Generally, the content of the CASPer® test is unique to each program type and country, so you may need to take the test more than once in a cycle if you are applying to multiple program types. However, if you are applying to the professions of dentistry, medicine and optometry in Canada you will write the test once during an admissions cycle. If you are applying to both Canadian and US medical schools, you need to write the US and Canadian CASPer® test.
How can I prepare for CASPer®?
There are many different ways you could prepare yourself for the CASPer® test. There isn’t one right way to prepare for this or any other admissions test. But in general, exposing yourself to the testing format, familiarizing yourself with relevant content, and finding an approach that works for you so you can structure your thoughts and move through the content quickly are key to doing your best.
Check the Test Prep page of CASPer®’s website for their tips to prepare for your test day.
You can test out some common strategies and see which ones help you to best organize your thoughts and make sure that you’re addressing all the questions.
If you are looking for more specific tips and tricks to help you prepare and be successful writing CASPer®, think about some combination of these options:
If you’re not sure where to start, drop by the Centre for Career Development library in the Tatham Centre.
How should I format my responses?
There isn’t one right format for a CASPer® response, but finding a format or strategy that works well for you can help you respond effectively and avoid getting bogged down in organizational details that have little bearing on how your response is scored. Test out different options and see which works best for you and the way your brain likes to organize information. Here’s one example:
Here’s one recommended format on how to approach CASPer®:
Due to the limited time to answer each question it may be helpful to use this format:
Are there test prep courses for CASPer®?
There are companies that offer CASPer® prep courses; however, UWaterloo students that provided feedback after writing CASPer® do not think they are necessary, nor do Admission Directors. At minimum, it will be helpful to understand the CASPer® format and strategies on how to write it.
Should you decide that practice and preparation are useful for you, check out the preparation program supported by CASPer® here.
What kinds of questions will they ask?
Generally, they’re asking reflective questions about your approach or action–oriented response to a specific scenario. The scenarios are ethical in nature, meaning there is no one right answer and typically multiple perspectives to be considered. The scenarios and following questions may or may not be health–related, but they certainly will relate to your ability to analyze a complex situation and communicate with others. Here are some examples to start:
Example 1
Video shows two people arguing about a convicted pedophile, John, who will be released soon from jail and will be living in their neighbourhood. Do you agree with this decision to release John?
Questions:
Example 2
Personal Descriptor CASPer® example: Consider the experiences you have and insight gained from these experiences that led you to believe that you would be a good physician.
Questions:
Example 3
Video of Head of Athletic Department talking to a mother who was complaining about her child not being selected for a team. Mother’s question at the end of the scenario was “Are you going to continue to allow this?”
Questions:
Example 4
Personal Descriptor CASPer® example: Talk about a stressful situation you have encountered.
Follow–up questions:
Can I get access to sample questions from previous tests?
Yes, it is possible to access question banks with CASPer® scenarios and questions to aid in your preparation beyond what’s available on the CASPer® website itself. The strength of third–party resources and their proximity to actual CASPer® scenarios depends highly on the specific resource and the extent to which the banks get updated each application cycle.
Unlike the MCAT, it’s not necessary to make use of extensive question banks to be successful, and these resources can be costly. If this option doesn’t work for you, that’s okay! Think about using some of the other strategies mentioned here. If you still have questions about the best method for you, you can connect with a Further Education Advisor in a drop–in to start a conversation.
Check if references are required and, if so, the number and type (academic or non-academic). Many programs require two academic references (meaning professors — although exceptions can be made for those who have been out of school for some time), while some ask for one academic and one non-academic. Examples of non-academic references are coaches, volunteer supervisors, and employers. If there are no guidelines on which type of reference is required, academic reference letters are usually highly valued, as your referee should be able to speak to your ability to be successful in a professional/graduate school.
Evaluate who can best provide a non-academic reference letter. Asking someone with a prestigious title, but who cannot provide any substance on your capabilities (with proof) will add no value to your application. Consider first what you want discussed in your reference letter and then find people who can provide that information.
Ask your potential referees in person: “Will you have time to write a strong supporting reference letter?” Then listen to how the individual responds. If you detect any hesitation, try to find someone else. Individuals could be reluctant to write a letter of reference if they have little to say that is positive about your work, or alternatively if they have little memory of you. Many referees will try to let you down easily in such cases. Providing them a way to say “no” can help ensure that you obtain only the most positive of references for your application, whereas including references from individuals who indicate that they do not know you well can be very detrimental to your application.
If your referee is unsure of what to include in the reference letter, suggest that they: include their credentials/accomplishments; provide proof about your abilities/attributes; and share what you accomplished in the course/work term (e.g., assignments, presentations, grades received), difficulty of course/work experience, and comparison of you to other successful students.
It is recommended that you cultivate relationships throughout your university experience, so that when the time comes to ask potential referees to write a letter, you have some choices. Many students worry about how to go about doing this, as they may not feel close enough to their professors to be memorable. But there are ways to tackle this challenge. Pick a professor from whom you have taken several classes, or one to whom you have submitted a particularly strong essay or project. Visit the professor during his or her office hours, or ask questions after class. Show that you are interested in the class content, and that you have a goal to attend graduate school or a professional program. You can mention through this process that in the future you hope that they might write a reference letter for you. This may help them to pay more attention to you. Start establishing these connections today.
Give referees enough time to write effective letters. Ask 4 to 6 weeks in advance for a reference letter, and provide the form, addressed envelope with postage (if necessary), your personal statement/letter of intent, a list of projects completed in their courses, admission requirements, and your résumé — anything that will help their task of writing a letter. Provide a general idea of why you want to attend that particular professional/graduate program, as well as what areas of the field interest you. Ask if your referee requires more information to write your letter.
Sometimes you will be given the option of an “open” versus a “closed” reference letter. An open letter means that you can read it prior to submission; however, it is best not to choose this option as such letters are not viewed as favourably as “closed,” and thus confidential, letters.
If you are not using a centralized application centre, referees will need to provide you with a reference letter for each program or school to which you are applying. These programs will require referees to submit references either directly to the program (electronically after you have provided their name/contact information, or by mail) or in a sealed envelope with a signature across the closing to the applicant. The application process might indicate when your references have been received, so you can use this information to follow-up and remind your referees if necessary. If you apply through a centralized application service, each referee completes only one reference form or letter, which is submitted directly to the application centre for distribution to each institution.
Admission committees look for specific examples of academic abilities as well as discipline, persistence, and responsibility. If a reference form is required, read through the different categories a referee needs to complete because this information may help you identify whom to ask to complete the form and reference letter. Always remember to send a thank-you note to your referee(s).
Transcripts need to be ordered directly from the school(s) you attended unless you are currently enrolled in, or have graduated from, an Ontario university or college and are applying through OUAC. In the latter case, submit a transcript request form to OUAC, and your transcripts will be ordered and forwarded to the institutions to which you are applying. If you are applying to a program at a school that you have already attended, you may not be required to submit a transcript.
It is always a good idea to check your unofficial transcript to ensure it is accurate. Allow enough time to order and have transcripts sent to the school to which you are applying. (At the University of Waterloo this is from the Registrar‘s Office for undergraduate transcripts and the Graduate Studies Office for graduate transcripts.) You may be asked to submit the transcript with your application package in a sealed, signed envelope. Check the admission requirements to determine if a final transcript needs to be sent after you complete your degree.
Graduate degree programs may begin in January, May, or September, and applications are generally due between December and February (for a September start date). In Ontario, applications to certain programs are made through OUAC. The online application becomes available approximately three months prior to the deadline. It usually takes between 5 to 25 to complete an application, so allow yourself enough time to do a thorough job. You do not need to complete the application in one sitting; you can enter and exit the application until you decide you are ready to submit. The following are applications available through OUAC:
If applying to professional programs outside Ontario, contact each institution to check the number of applicants accepted from out of province. Apply directly to each institution. In many cases, an online application form is used.
If your application process involves an interview, please review the Interviewing pages within this Further education section to learn more about graduate/professional school interviews.
If you receive an offer from your second-choice school, contact your first-choice school to see if you can accelerate its decision. If you receive a letter stating you are on a waiting list, determine if you can take steps to increase the likelihood of being accepted. It may be possible to provide additional reference letters and other information to show how your skills and experience have grown since your original application. If possible, visit schools and try to meet with decision makers. And, if you know a faculty member with connections to your program or institution of choice, ask him or her to speak to the admissions committee on your behalf.
Although many students strengthen their qualifications and reapply, it is important to be realistic (i.e., know when and how to develop a viable alternative that will still allow you to realize many of your goals).
If you are unsure of your interests or goals, or don‘t have a parallel plan, please review the Decision-making section of CareerHub.
A veterinarian is a doctor of animal health who has trained at a university for at least six years to earn a doctoral degree (the Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM) degree) and is licensed to provide medical and surgical care for animals. Veterinarians protect the health of both animals and humans, and play a role in animal welfare, environmental protection, food safety, and public health. A licensed veterinarian can work in several different areas including private practice, government, teaching, research, or industry.
Currently, Canada has five veterinary schools: Ontario Veterinary College (OVC) at the University of Guelph, Atlantic Veterinary College at the University of Prince Edward Island, Western College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Saskatchewan, University of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, and the Faculté de Méecine Vétérinaire Université de Montréal (French program). Each school has specific residency requirements that may limit where candidates can apply (for example: OVC has limited space for applicants who are not Ontario residents, while Saskatchewan has no space for applicants who are not residents of a Western province or the territories). Check each school’s website for more details. Realistically, if you are an Ontario resident, OVC is your only Canadian option.
A DVM degree program is four years in length. The first year or two may focus on science subjects like animal anatomy and physiology, nutrition, and virology. The third year may focus on clinical studies in which students work with living animals. The fourth year is usually spent participating in practical experiences, such as practicums or externships. Specialization in surgery, dentistry, cardiology, or other fields requires additional years of study. You must obtain a licence by passing the North American Veterinary Licensing Exam (NAVLE). There may be additional licensure requirements depending on the province/territory you live in. To learn more about the additional requirements, please contact the veterinary licensing body of the province you live in for more information. If you are considering applying to a non–Canadian institution, but want to complete a residency or practise in Canada, research your options to ensure that this is possible.
In addition to residency requirements, there are specific pre–requisite course requirements that differ for each school. These can include courses in Biology, Biochemistry, Genetics, Statistics, and the Humanities. For some programs in the United States and Prince Edward Island, the Graduate Record Exam (GRE) is required. Some U.S. schools will accept the MCAT in place of the GRE; minimum score requirements and test deadlines can be found on individual school websites.
The minimum academic requirements typically include an average of at least 75%–78%. Some schools, like OVC, have higher competitive averages, typically from mid to high 80’s. Application deadlines vary by school, ranging from October through March. To find a list of all accredited Doctor of Veterinary Medicine programs, review the American Veterinary Medical Association website.
Standard interview format is when candidates are asked a series of questions in front of one or more admission panelists. The main portion of the interview consists of the interviewer asking you questions to try to determine your fit. Generally, you have an opportunity to ask any questions that you may have at the end of the interview.
Practice your interview skills by signing up for the Professional School Interviews (Standard) workshop.
Behaviour-based interviews are designed to elicit information about how you have performed in the past because past behaviour is a good indicator of how you will function in the future. Interviewers develop their questions around the traits and skills they consider necessary for succeeding in a profession. Occasionally, behaviour-based questions are used in the MMI interview format as well. These questions usually begin with phrases such as:
Some applicants find the format of such questions difficult to understand and have trouble responding. However, if you have done your research and have prepared for the interview, you will have work, academic, volunteer, and life experiences ready to share. You can prepare for behaviour-based questions by recalling specific instances that demonstrate your accomplishments, abilities, and fit for the profession/field. Be certain to tell the truth, get to the point, stay focused and positive, and be consistent with your responses. Common behaviour-based interview themes include the following:
Next Step: Work through your résumé to find specific examples for each theme above. Use the STAR approach to describe each example.
The “STAR Approach” is a useful technique for answering behaviour-based questions:
Situation: Provide Background and context:
Task: Describe what you needed to do
Action: Explain what you actually did and how you did it
Result: Describe the outcome of your actions
For example, in response to the query “What experience do you have organizing projects?” you determine that the qualification being evaluated is organizational skills. Your skill/knowledge/ability statement could be, “I have developed excellent organizational skills by working on two major projects. The one I would like to tell you about ended successfully six months ago.”
Every statement you make must be true. Don’t lie or embellish. Ideally, the example you choose should be something that requires a competency similar to the typical work of the prospective professional. If you do not have a similar experience to relate, try to choose the most relevant story from your academic, extracurricular or volunteer activities — do not make it up! Describe the what, who, when, where, why, and how, and talk about the successful outcome or what you learned from the experience.
As you tell the story allow the interviewer to see or live through the action with you. Choose words that will help the interviewer visualize you in the experience (e.g., “It was five minutes before closing on the busiest night of the year when the power went out...”). Whenever possible, include positive feedback from supervisors, colleagues, professors, and others to reinforce your accomplishment. Humour, if used appropriately, can also be an effective tool, because it helps the interviewer to remember you.
The next step is the one that most candidates forget. Tell the interviewer what specific benefits or competitive advantage you can bring to the profession/field because of the experience you have just described. For example, “As part of the team being formed, I would be able to coordinate....” Avoid generic statements such as, “All professions need people with leadership ability.”
An interviewer will use situational/hypothetical questions to establish how you would react to and handle real-life situations. For situational/hypothetical questions, candidates must have a good understanding of the profession and its requirements. Here are some examples of this type of question:
When answering problem-solving questions demonstrate your ability to process information quickly, think logically, and solve creatively. Interviewers place emphasis on the thought process rather than on the conclusion. Examples of problem-solving questions include the following:
The key is not to worry about getting the “right” answer but, rather, to demonstrate your logical thought process in solving the problem. The following five-step process is appropriate for handling most problem-solving questions:
Keep in mind, there is no right answer, only your answer.
In addition to asking the other types of questions mentioned, many interviewers rely on a series of standard questions, and you should prepare for them. Occasionally, classic interview questions are used in the MMI interview format as well.
While preparation is key, it is not possible to predict and prepare for all interview questions. Instead, review your résumé, application, and research the profession (current and future state). Then put information into different categories (e.g., accomplishments, understanding of profession, unique qualities, challenges/weaknesses) enabling you to provide examples as necessary.
The “PAWS” model is a useful method for answering classic questions such as “Tell me about yourself” and “Why do you want to be a ___________?”
When an interviewer asks this question, s/he is looking for those aspects of your life that are relevant to the profession/field, such as how you became interested in the field, related experience, and courses taken. “PAWS” stands for Profile, Academic, Work, and Skills. Include all or as many of the four (in any order) to reinforce your fit for the field/profession.
Here are some examples of what to discuss in each of the four areas:
Profile: Mention how you became interested in this field and point out any relevant community involvement, extracurricular activities, memberships, and personal interests that further demonstrate your commitment to the field
Academic: Talk about your educational background (degrees/diplomas/certifications) and other related training and professional development initiatives/courses that you have participated in
Work: Highlight paid or unpaid (volunteer) experiences related to the profession
Skills: Refer to specific skills/competencies that relate to the profession or field (e.g., communication, interpersonal, time management, problem-solving skills)
Please read Delivering bad news stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews.
Please read Ethical scenario stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews
To supplement the information you obtained before the interview, you should ask questions during the interview (although you will not have this opportunity with MMI interviews). Some questions will arise naturally during the interview, but it is wise to prepare a number of questions in advance. Asking questions will demonstrate your interest and help you determine if the program/school fits your personality, skills, interests, and values.
Your questions should pertain to the program/school and show your enthusiasm and knowledge. By asking intelligent, well-thought-out questions that genuinely matter to you, you will convince the interviewer that you are serious about the program and institution. If a question has been answered during the interview, do not ask it again; such repetition will suggest that you were not listening. It is important to compose your own questions; however, the following may give you a starting point:
Chiropractic, naturopathic medicine, osteopathic medicine, physician assistant, and veterinary medicine programs also have an interview process. Typically, the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College and the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine have standard panel formats. Osteopathic medicine schools in the United States, the physician assistant programs at McMaster University and the University of Toronto, and the Ontario Veterinary College at the University of Guelph hold MMI interviews. Health-related programs at the Michener Institute in Toronto host MMI interviews as well, and regardless of the program applied to at the Michener Institute, candidates move through the same stations.
Information on interview process and format often changes. The most up-to-date information for each school can be found on each program’s individual website.
An applicant interacts with an actor, and there is an observer in the room.
For example, “You are roommates with Alex. She hasn’t done her share of dishes in the last month and leaves her belongings all over the apartment. Her room is starting to smell from the leftover food/dishes she leaves out. Enter the room and discuss this situation with her.”
There is no right or wrong answer when you are answering a critical thinking question. Many of these questions contain an ethical component, and the idea is to minimize the negative outcome for anyone involved in the ethical dilemma presented to you. Be consistent in your response even if the interviewer tries to sway your opinion by adding new information partway through your answer. On the other hand, if the new information has a great impact one way or the other, clearly state your justification for changing your opinion. For health-related admission interviews, answers should always be patient-focused. Health care is about objectivity, best health care, and best outcomes from a medical standpoint, not what a person can contribute to society.
Identify the issues in the question, make sure you understand exactly what is being asked, and address the issue(s) raised. Endeavour to provide unbiased and neutral solutions. Rather than start with the outcome you best subscribe to, lead the interviewer to the conclusion with your evidence-based reasoning. Wherever possible, try to back up your claims with proof (e.g., items in the news, journal articles, and other research from valid and verifiable sources).
One approach to ethical questions is to use the PESTLE model (Orfano, 2011). PESTLE stands for:
Choose three to four of these perspectives and evaluate the situation. Avoid having your argument seem one sided. Ensure that you are evaluating both pros and cons for the different PESTLE perspectives. In addition, know regulations and your own ethical considerations — what is the scope of your authority and extent of your obligation?
If you are unprepared to answer the question, ask the interviewer to clarify the question and/or to provide some probing or leading questions. If that is not possible, attempt to address the part(s) of the question for which you have some knowledge. Responses to ethical questions can be fairly long. Towards the end of your response, use phrases such as “in conclusion” or “in summary” or “as a final recommendation” or “given the above, I believe” to indicate that you are concluding your response.
For example, “In some countries there is presumed consent for organ donation (it is assumed that you wish to donate your viable organs unless you opt out). Canada has the opposite system where you must sign up to be an organ donor. Do you think we should have presumed consent in Canada? Discuss this issue with the interviewer.”
When possible, show empathy and compassion when working through the PESTLE model (or another model of choice):
With the PESTLE model: Focus on three to four perspectives and have pros/cons for each.
In most cases pros/cons should be patient-centered, student-centered, client-centered, etc. Also show who else will be affected by the situation, don’t just focus on the people listed in the situation (if the situation is about a child think about how it will affect their parent(s), siblings, teachers, school, educational system, etc.).
P: Political pros/cons: government interventions/taxes/policies can influence health & education
E: Economic pros/cons: save/spend time and money
S: Social pros/cons: cultural aspects, health consciousness, population growth, age distribution, career attributes
T: Technological pros/cons: R&D activity, automation, changes and innovation
L: Legal pros/cons: legal implications
E: Ethical pros/cons: ethical dilemmas OR Environmental pros/cons: weather, climate change, tourism, farming
Other models to address ethical questions are ABCDE of Medical Ethics (Levine, 1994) and CARVE (Gampel):
Transcript: Critical thinking station: PESTLE feedback (DOCX)
Transcript: Critical thinking station: people perspective (DOCX)
Transcript: Critical thinking station: people perspective feedback (DOCX)
Two candidates work together to complete a task, and one or two observers are present. One applicant will deliver instructions/explain (generally referred to as the leader) and the other applicant (generally referred to as the follower) will complete a task (e.g., puzzle building, drawing). The process is repeated at another station and the roles are reversed. You may or not be with the same candidate. Typically, you are placed back to back with your partner so you cannot see each other.
A common scenario is: “Guide your partner to complete this puzzle. At the end of the station you will be given time to provide feedback to each other”.
Generally there are two candidates at this station and two observers. Each candidate is presented with a side to argue. Typically, after three to five minutes of discussion, you will need to verbally evaluate yourself and the other candidate.
For example, “Candidate 1 believes that the Olympics are a waste of money; candidate 2 disagrees. Defend your position to the other candidate.”
When you enter a health-related profession, generally you will be taught how to deliver bad news to a patient. While it is not expected that you know how to do this in your admissions interview, often you will be asked about this to get a sense of your empathy and compassion. For example, “How would you tell a 65-year-old woman she has cancer?” Sometimes this scenario is used with an MMI acting/role play station. A tip for delivering bad news is to keep your facial expressions neutral. As a health care professional, you want to be careful about displaying emotion when delivering bad news. This format is taught in medical school and may be helpful:
SPIKES was developed by Robert Buckman, MD, Associate Professor of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto and modified from the original version (Sandrick, K.1998).
Sometimes candidates are asked how they would react to a scenario that involves an ethical component such as witnessing cheating/stealing, or other unethical behaviours. How you respond/react to these situations indicates how you will act in your profession.
Consider both your ethical actions and the interpersonal situation.
For example, “You see your coworker carrying work equipment to their personal car. How do you handle the situation?”
These stations are used to test future MMI stations, although they will not be identified as such.
These stations are used to test future MMI stations, although they will not be identified as such.
These stations are used to test future MMI stations, although they will not be identified as such.
In this type of station, candidates are allowed to rest and sometimes offered water or can talk to a current student.
Students have said that the break station throws them off during the actual MMI. Do not take the time to rehash all of the previous stations, or work yourself up over what questions could be next. Take a break from talking if that is what you need and try to breathe and relax. If there is a current student at the rest station to speak to, be polite and interact with them. Use the conversation to help calm your nerves/get your mind off of waiting.
In this type of station, candidates are allowed to rest and sometimes offered water or can talk to a current student.
Students have said that the break station throws them off during the actual MMI. Do not take the time to rehash all of the previous stations, or work yourself up over what questions could be next. Take a break from talking if that is what you need and try to breathe and relax. If there is a current student at the rest station to speak to, be polite and interact with them. Use the conversation to help calm your nerves/get your mind off of waiting.
Sometimes, even MMI interviews have one or two stations that ask standard/panel interview questions. Please read the Standard professional school interviews questions and recommended models for more information. Common standard questions for health professions generally include: “Why do you want to be a _________?” “Tell me about a time when you did __________”. “What do you know about the profession?”
In many stations it is important to demonstrate your knowledge of the current trends, policies, challenges, and changing roles of health care practitioners. Keep up to date with the governing body for your future profession, and make sure to watch/read the news as much as possible to be aware of current events. Some of these questions can include sensitive topics like physician-assisted suicide, stem cell research, abortion, aboriginal and alternative medicine, access to care in rural populations, as well as school specific teaching methods or curriculum
For example, “What is the biggest challenge currently facing the profession of _________?” or “If the Prime Minister of Canada asked you to recommend one change to our health care system that would make the biggest impact, what would you recommend?”
In this station, candidates review a short video and then write answers to (generally) standard ethical, situational, and behaviour-based questions.
Applicants are ranked at each station by the interviewer or observer. Interviewers do not discuss their rankings with other interviewers, so you are independently rated by each interviewer which eliminates bias.
The evaluation criterion varies each year. The interviewer is provided with a list of criteria that the school is looking for in a candidate. Depending on the school you might be given marks for: demeanor, maturity, intellect, compassion, overall impression, communication, English fluency, ability to organize, integrity in ethics, critical-thinking skills, soft skills identified in the question, incorporating personal examples. You will be rewarded for being methodical and articulate. Interviewers want to see how you process information. You can read McMaster’s Manual for Interviewers online to see an example evaluation form.
Prefer to learn in person? Attend the MMI Simulation workshop to practice answering questions and improve your skills.
Gampel, E. H. A Framework for Moral Reasoning. Retrieved from http://www.csuchico.edu/~egampel/students/solving2.htm
Levine, D. (1994). Physician-patient Communication in the Urban Clinical Setting. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359272/pdf/bullnyacadmed01039-0058.pdf
Orfano, F. (2011). Components of a PESTLE Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.brighthub.com/office/project-management/articles/51754.html
Sandrick, K. (1998). Codified principles enhance physician/patient communication. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, 83(11), 13-17.
The interview is an exchange of information between you and the interviewer(s). It is used to help assess interest in, and suitability (i.e., competencies) for the program of study, and fit for the field/profession. To make this assessment, the interview committee will endeavour to obtain information about your skills, values (personal ethics), personality, and interests. Interviewers may be interested in your integrity (personal and professional accountability), maturity, compassion, sincerity, honesty, originality, curiosity, intelligence, confidence, motivation, leadership skills, communication skills, ability to relate to others, cultural and social interests, work and volunteer experiences, knowledge of relevant issues and events, and, in some cases, your ability to withstand the emotional/physical demands of the profession.
Succeeding in an interview may depend on your professional appearance and the interviewer’s first impression of you. If the first impression is not positive, it will be difficult to change the interviewer’s mind during the rest of the interview.
Arrive early, dressed in attire appropriate for the type of admissions interview you are attending. For health and business-related interviews dress conservatively and keep fashion accessories to a minimum. Avoid wearing strong scents (or any at all) because many people have environmental allergies. Ensure your cell phone is turned off.
Greet each person with respect and professionalism. When you shake hands, make eye contact and smile. Handshakes should be firm but not aggressive; try to match the grip of the interviewer. Standard North American practice is to shake hands at the beginning and end of an interview. However, if you are not comfortable with this practice tell the interviewer that you prefer not to shake hands and why. It is good etiquette to wait to sit down until the interviewer invites you to do so.
Don’t worry about being a little nervous during the interview; being nervous is normal and expected. Remember, the interviewer wants you to have the right qualifications and interest in the profession. Many interviewers will begin the interview with some “small talk” to help you relax. This may seem irrelevant to the program, but you are still being evaluated; be sure to demonstrate a positive attitude.
To demonstrate effectively your suitability and value, you must know yourself. Review your self-assessment information, volunteer experiences, application, personal statement/letter of intent, and your résumé. Be prepared to give examples to substantiate all claims. Some interviewers will want you to talk about your mistakes and what lessons you learned from them. Ensure that your responses are sufficiently detailed. This is especially important in “closed” or “blind” interviews where committee members may not have been privy to your complete application.
Review professional and regulatory bodies’ websites to be familiar with the current profession, future directions, and the competencies important for someone in the field. It is important to demonstrate your genuine interest in and fit for the profession. Read the notes you made as you reviewed print and online materials, during volunteer opportunities/job shadowing, and when you talked with others. Keep current with events and new research. Many of the MMI stations will be relevant to current topics in the news, both health- and non-health related. The best way to gather this information is to follow the news, review association websites, and to speak with professionals in the field. Your interpersonal skills will be a particularly important factor in people-focused professions as you will be required to be approachable and to work closely with patients/students/clients.
To prepare for the interview, ensure that you research the faculty/program and, if appropriate, the interviewers’ areas of expertise in order to understand the nuances of each. If possible, visit the campus and talk to current students in the program, attend classes, and visit labs.
The order in which you deliver the content of your answer indicates your priorities. For example if your answer to: “Why do you want to be a doctor?” is “... to help patients, conduct research, teach” this will create a more positive impression than “... a high income, prestige, to help patients.”
Awkward situations may occur during an interview, and it is up to you to be prepared to confidently handle whatever happens. To increase your confidence and preparation for an interview, practise. Check for quality of information in your answers and the positive, non-verbal reinforcement of your words. By practising responses out loud, you can hear your answers and assess their effectiveness. But don’t practise so much that you lose your spontaneity and your answers sound rehearsed.
The key to tricky situations is to remember that barriers to admission can often be overcome by focusing on the positive. Circumstances that you may find problematic are:
If you answer a question and there is no prompt response or follow-up question, try to remain calm and collected. Silence may not be a negative sign; the interviewer could be taking time to process and record your answer, and/or be considering the next question.
In response to uncomfortable silence, ask the interviewers if they require any further details regarding your last response, shifting the responsibility to them. Resist the temptation to ramble because you may provide irrelevant information that may hurt your chances of being offered admission.
Although the interviewer will likely take notes, generally you should not. If you have your head down writing, the conversation will be uncomfortable and unengaging because of your lack of eye contact and inability to show enthusiasm.
Making brief notes is acceptable when you need to record information that may be easily forgotten, such as a key word, phone number, or contact information. If you fear you may not recall other pertinent details, document the information immediately after the interview.
You may have difficulty communicating your thoughts clearly and concisely, especially when you are not sure how to respond to a question. The key is to remain calm and positive, focus on the question, and continue to remind yourself that you are doing well. You may request clarification if you are not sure what the interviewer is asking, or pause and politely ask for a few moments to consider your response; however, don’t take too much time because interviewers want to see that you can think well under pressure.
After a brief pause, if you still cannot respond to the interviewer’s question, you may ask to defer your answer to the end of the interview. The risk is that interviews usually follow a certain structure and the question might be missed entirely, leaving the interviewer with an unanswered question. If you’re stumped because you simply do not know the answer, be honest with the interviewer and, depending on the type of question, discuss how you would handle the situation or resources you would use to find the answer.
Interviewers will often ask negatively phrased questions to assess your perceived weaknesses and strengths. The following are a few examples:
Be honest and discuss a real weakness or past event that would not negatively impact performance for the profession/field you are applying for. Avoid the popular advice to turn a weakness into a strength (e.g., “I’m a perfectionist...”) because this kind of response is unconvincing and over used. Be sure to end your “weakness” response on a positive note by indicating what steps you are taking to overcome the weakness.
It is important to keep your answers short and to be as positive as possible, even when answering a negatively framed question.
It is a pleasure to be interviewed by someone who is enthusiastic about the profession, but it is not desirable if you aren’t able to market yourself because the interviewer monopolizes the discussion. Tactfully break into the conversation to help keep the interview focused on the subject you know best: you! You might say, “I had a similar experience...” or “It’s interesting that you say that because I am also skilled in...”
Is your body or verbal language contributing to the problem? Without being rude, offer less acknowledgement (e.g., nodding, “that’s interesting,” “really?”). If you are not given adequate time to market your qualifications and the interview is drawing to a close, request a few moments to summarize your qualifications for the profession/field, highlighting key points you had planned to discuss.
What should you do if you’re in the middle of an interview and have just been asked what is clearly an illegal question? There is no clear-cut answer. Much depends on you.
In some cases, you may be able to answer the “hidden” question. Think of what information the interviewer is trying to elicit. For example, “Do you have or plan to have children?” may indicate a concern about your ability to put in the time to complete the program.
You may elect to say “Why do you ask?” or “Would you explain how this point is connected to the qualifications for this program?” This could cause the interviewer to reconsider or clarify the question. It may offend some interviewers, but probably not the majority.
If you feel that you should not answer the question (you shouldn’t have to, after all) or that you are not interested in attending the program, you may state, “I don’t feel obligated to answer that” or “That question is inappropriate.” If you choose this option, you will either enlighten (the interviewer may not realize it is illegal and will be happy that you pointed it out), or offend (the interviewer may not consider you for the program). At some schools there is a post-interview evaluation, so a candidate can report illegal questions.
It is best not to bring up your religious beliefs in your answers. Interviewers for health-related professions could worry that when you are practising in your profession, and not being supervised, you might present different religious options to a patient and this isn’t the expected practice. As a health-care provider you need to look at things objectively and not present your own ideologies.
Smile when appropriate during the interview. Be enthusiastic and responsive. As you talk about your past and present activities, your passion and energy can be communicated both through your words and your body language (e.g., an excited tone of voice, leaning forward, nodding your head in agreement). Maintaining eye contact is important; failure to do so may imply a lack of confidence or, worse, cause the interviewer to question your truthfulness.
Sit comfortably, without slouching. Don’t put anything on your lap or in your hands if it will restrict your natural body movement or if you may be tempted to play with it. Keep your clipboard, note pad, briefcase, or portfolio on the floor beside your chair for easy retrieval.
Respond to questions specifically and concisely but give sufficient details to enable the interviewer to evaluate your credentials. Interviewers become frustrated when they have to listen to long, rambling answers. Think before you speak. It is quite acceptable to pause before talking in order to organize your thoughts. Avoid verbal fillers such as “um,” “ah,” “you know,” or regularly repeating the question to provide thinking time.
Use professional language. Avoid slang. Speak clearly. Watch the interviewer for clues on how the interview is progressing. Is the interviewer’s face or body language telling you that your answers are too long, not detailed enough, too boring? If in doubt, ask the interviewer if more or fewer details are needed.
Prepare in advance to talk about any topic that you feel uncomfortable about. If there is something that you don’t want an interviewer to inquire about, it will likely be raised during the interview. Practise your answer out loud often enough to feel confident, and to decrease your emotions surrounding the answer (e.g., “Tell me about your most painful experience”). Maintain poise and self-control. Consider a difficult issue as a learning opportunity that has made you a better person.
This is an interview where one interviewer conducts an interview with one candidate. This is typical for MBA and graduate school interviews.
For health-related interviews it is common for there to be a panel of interviewers. Often this consists of a faculty member or someone in the profession, a current student, and a community member. Each interviewer will be assessing you differently (e.g., a community member will assess if they would choose you as a professional).
Although it is important to have good eye contact with the person who asks you a question, also look at the other interviewers frequently to include them in the discussion. Try to remember each person’s name and use his or her name during the interview.
The interview process often includes meeting with current students and a tour of the site, so wear comfortable shoes.
If given the choice between an on- or off-campus interview (common for MBA), try to arrange an on-campus interview. This will give you the opportunity to talk to current students, sit in on a class, see the campus, and get a better sense whether this is the right school and location for you. However, if you are not able to attend an on-campus interview, you will not be penalized.
All of the usual advice about interview skills still applies. Your attire is your choice, but you may find that dressing professionally increases your confidence and allows you to perform better. Keep your application, school information, points that you want to highlight, and list of questions handy; in fact, keep these in front of you during the interview for easy reference. (Don’t shuffle your papers though!) Have a pen and paper available to note any comments or questions that may occur to you during the interview. Choose your words carefully and be succinct. It is also important to vary your voice tone, tempo, and pitch to keep the interviewer’s attention. Ensure that you are in a private setting to eliminate any distractions or background noise.
In this type of interview, interviewers use video technology to conduct interviews at a distance. Use the same strategies as you would if you were meeting in person. Depending on the sophistication of the technology, you may experience short transmission delays. Make eye contact with the camera, which, to the interviewer, appears as direct “eye contact.” Remember to check the monitor periodically to observe the interviewer’s body language.
After each interview, evaluate how well you did by completing the following “Interview evaluation worksheet”
Save this list to record how you perform during interviews and to document your progress.
Standard interview format is when candidates are asked a series of questions in front of one or more admission panelists. The main portion of the interview consists of the interviewer asking you questions to try to determine your fit. Generally, you have an opportunity to ask any questions that you may have at the end of the interview.
Practice your interview skills by signing up for the Professional School Interviews (Standard) workshop.
Behaviour-based interviews are designed to elicit information about how you have performed in the past because past behaviour is a good indicator of how you will function in the future. Interviewers develop their questions around the traits and skills they consider necessary for succeeding in a profession. Occasionally, behaviour-based questions are used in the MMI interview format as well. These questions usually begin with phrases such as:
Some applicants find the format of such questions difficult to understand and have trouble responding. However, if you have done your research and have prepared for the interview, you will have work, academic, volunteer, and life experiences ready to share. You can prepare for behaviour-based questions by recalling specific instances that demonstrate your accomplishments, abilities, and fit for the profession/field. Be certain to tell the truth, get to the point, stay focused and positive, and be consistent with your responses. Common behaviour-based interview themes include the following:
Next Step: Work through your résumé to find specific examples for each theme above. Use the STAR approach to describe each example.
The “STAR Approach” is a useful technique for answering behaviour-based questions:
Situation: Provide Background and context:
Task: Describe what you needed to do
Action: Explain what you actually did and how you did it
Result: Describe the outcome of your actions
For example, in response to the query “What experience do you have organizing projects?” you determine that the qualification being evaluated is organizational skills. Your skill/knowledge/ability statement could be, “I have developed excellent organizational skills by working on two major projects. The one I would like to tell you about ended successfully six months ago.”
Every statement you make must be true. Don’t lie or embellish. Ideally, the example you choose should be something that requires a competency similar to the typical work of the prospective professional. If you do not have a similar experience to relate, try to choose the most relevant story from your academic, extracurricular or volunteer activities — do not make it up! Describe the what, who, when, where, why, and how, and talk about the successful outcome or what you learned from the experience.
As you tell the story allow the interviewer to see or live through the action with you. Choose words that will help the interviewer visualize you in the experience (e.g., “It was five minutes before closing on the busiest night of the year when the power went out...”). Whenever possible, include positive feedback from supervisors, colleagues, professors, and others to reinforce your accomplishment. Humour, if used appropriately, can also be an effective tool, because it helps the interviewer to remember you.
The next step is the one that most candidates forget. Tell the interviewer what specific benefits or competitive advantage you can bring to the profession/field because of the experience you have just described. For example, “As part of the team being formed, I would be able to coordinate....” Avoid generic statements such as, “All professions need people with leadership ability.”
An interviewer will use situational/hypothetical questions to establish how you would react to and handle real-life situations. For situational/hypothetical questions, candidates must have a good understanding of the profession and its requirements. Here are some examples of this type of question:
When answering problem-solving questions demonstrate your ability to process information quickly, think logically, and solve creatively. Interviewers place emphasis on the thought process rather than on the conclusion. Examples of problem-solving questions include the following:
The key is not to worry about getting the “right” answer but, rather, to demonstrate your logical thought process in solving the problem. The following five-step process is appropriate for handling most problem-solving questions:
Keep in mind, there is no right answer, only your answer.
In addition to asking the other types of questions mentioned, many interviewers rely on a series of standard questions, and you should prepare for them. Occasionally, classic interview questions are used in the MMI interview format as well.
While preparation is key, it is not possible to predict and prepare for all interview questions. Instead, review your résumé, application, and research the profession (current and future state). Then put information into different categories (e.g., accomplishments, understanding of profession, unique qualities, challenges/weaknesses) enabling you to provide examples as necessary.
The “PAWS” model is a useful method for answering classic questions such as “Tell me about yourself” and “Why do you want to be a ___________?”
When an interviewer asks this question, s/he is looking for those aspects of your life that are relevant to the profession/field, such as how you became interested in the field, related experience, and courses taken. “PAWS” stands for Profile, Academic, Work, and Skills. Include all or as many of the four (in any order) to reinforce your fit for the field/profession.
Here are some examples of what to discuss in each of the four areas:
Profile: Mention how you became interested in this field and point out any relevant community involvement, extracurricular activities, memberships, and personal interests that further demonstrate your commitment to the field
Academic: Talk about your educational background (degrees/diplomas/certifications) and other related training and professional development initiatives/courses that you have participated in
Work: Highlight paid or unpaid (volunteer) experiences related to the profession
Skills: Refer to specific skills/competencies that relate to the profession or field (e.g., communication, interpersonal, time management, problem-solving skills)
Please read Delivering bad news stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews.
Please read Ethical scenario stations. This type of question is found in both Standard and MMI professional school interviews
To supplement the information you obtained before the interview, you should ask questions during the interview (although you will not have this opportunity with MMI interviews). Some questions will arise naturally during the interview, but it is wise to prepare a number of questions in advance. Asking questions will demonstrate your interest and help you determine if the program/school fits your personality, skills, interests, and values.
Your questions should pertain to the program/school and show your enthusiasm and knowledge. By asking intelligent, well-thought-out questions that genuinely matter to you, you will convince the interviewer that you are serious about the program and institution. If a question has been answered during the interview, do not ask it again; such repetition will suggest that you were not listening. It is important to compose your own questions; however, the following may give you a starting point:
Previous page
Next page